Policy Making in Foreign Language Teaching towards Globalization: the Act on the Promotion of Education of Critical Foreign Languages in Korea

• Authors: Kyungeun Park , Jeong Kyung Park , Sungeun Choi , Taejin Koh

Abstracts

EN

This study focuses on the implications of the enactment of the Act on the Promotion of Education of Critical Foreign Languages in Korea. This act is a legal institutionalization of the state’s responsibilities for and roles of teaching less commonly taught foreign languages. Foreign language education policy in the country has focused on English and a few major foreign languages. However, the Korean government came to realize the importance of teaching numerous languages that had been considered minor ones to cope with “glocalization”. With the enactment of this Act, the Korean government officially recognized the importance of education related to various foreign languages within its legal framework for public education. The objective of this study is to review the background and outline of the Act and examine the implementation of the projects associated with it. This paper also discusses the expected effectiveness of the Act for teaching diverse foreign languages and issues in the implementation process.

Keywords

EN

education policy; critical foreign languages; Korea; glocalization; foreign language teaching

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 56
• Pages: 139-147

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Kyungeun Park

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea

author

Jeong Kyung Park

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea

author

Sungeun Choi

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea

author

Taejin Koh

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea

References

• International Monetary Fund. (2018). World Economic Outlook (April 2018). Resource document. Retrieved 9/7/2018, from http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD.
• Geschiere, P. (2009). The Perils of Belonging: Autochthony, Citizenship, and Exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World. New York: Routledge.
• Graddol, D. (2004). The Future of Language. Science, 303(5662), 1329-1331.
• Kabel, A. (2016). Afterword: Decentering the Hydra: Towards a more equitable linguistic order. In P. Bunce, R. Phillipson, V. Rapatahana, & R. Tupas (Eds.), Why English? Confronting the Hydra (pp. 269-285). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Korea Legislation Research Institute. (2017a). The Act on the promotion of education of CFL (Act No.13944, 03. Feb.2016). Retrieved 31/7/2018, from https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=38337&lang=ENG.
• Korea Legislation Research Institute. (2017b). Enforcement decree of the promotion of education of CFL (Presidential Decree No. 27420, 04. Aug.2016). Retrieved 31/7/2018, from http://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=39837&type=sogan&key=2.
• National Institute for International Education. (2017). The first five-year (2017~2021) Master Plan for the promotion of critical foreign language education. Retrieved 18/7/2018, from http://www.niied.go.kr/board.do?boardConfigNo=81&menuNo=282&boardNo=7889&action=view.
• McCrum, R. (2010). GLOBISH: How the English Language Became the World’s Language. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25-44). London: Sage.
• Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.19.56.2.11

Biblioteka Nauki

1968211