Effectiveness of the AA “4C” Authentic Assessment Model: A Single-Case-Research (SCR)

• Authors: Badrun Kartowagiran , Samsul Hadi , Nur Wahyumiani , Fitri Alfarisa , Widowati Pusporini

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of this study is to show the effectiveness of the AA “4C” model in increasing teachers’ abilities. The study is a Single Case Research using the ABABA design. The subject of the study was a natural-science teacher. Results of the observation conducted continuously by three observers show that each of the teacher’s ability items improves from the first condition, to the second condition, and to the third condition. This finding is supported by the results of the Manova technique showing that the AA “4C” model is shown to be effective in improving teachers’ abilities in conducting authentic assessment.

Keywords

EN

authentic assessment; effectiveness of the AA “4C”

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 57
• Pages: 200-209

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Badrun Kartowagiran

• Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

author

Samsul Hadi

• Universitas Negeri

author

Nur Wahyumiani

• Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta

author

Fitri Alfarisa

• Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

author

Widowati Pusporini

• Universitas Sarjana wiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta

References

• Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M.A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102-1134. DOI:10.3102/0034654308326084
• Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement, 45(1), 131-142. DOI:10.11 77/0013164485451012
• Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 812, 012100). DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012100
• Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2012). Professional development international. New York: Pearson
• Brown, G.T.L., Irving, S.E., & Keegan, P.J. (2014). An introduction to educational assessment, measurement & evaluation. Auckland, New Zealand: Dunmore Publishing Ltd.
• Feldt, L.S., & Brennant, R.L. (1989). “Reliability,” Educational measurement, edited by Robert L Linn. New York: Macmillan.
• Frey, B.B., Schmitt, V.L., & Allen, J.P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 17(2).
• Gulikers, J.T.M., Kester, L., Kirschner, P.A., & Bastiaens, T.J., (2008). The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 172-186. DOI: 10.3102/0162373715576075
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
• Hamdi, S., & Kartowagiran, B. (2018). Developing a Testlet Model for Mathematics at Elementary Level. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 375-390. DOI:10.12973/iji.2018.11326a
• Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69-95.
• Kartowagiran, B & Maddini, H. (2015). Evaluation Model for Islamic Education Learning in Junior High School and Its Significance to Students’ Behaviours. American Journal of Educational Research, 3, 8, 990-995 DOI:10.12691/education-3-8-7
• Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model assessment autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa Sekolah menengah Pertama (SMP): Implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131-141 DOI:10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063
• Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2017). Model Asesmen Autentik untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Penelitian Tim Pascasarjana Tahun ke III (tidak diterbitkan)
• Lickona, T. (2009). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.
• Marzano, R.J. Frontier, T., & Livinnhston, D. (2011). Effective supervision. Alexandria: ASCD
• Natalia, E.N., Asib, A.,Kristina, D. (2018). The Application of authentic assessment for students writing skill. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7, 2, 49-53. DOI: 10.15640/jehd.v7n2a5
• Nitko, A. J & Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational assessment of the student. Boston, MA: Pearson
• Raymond, J.E., Homer, C.S.E., Smith, R., & Gray, J.E. (2012). Learning through authentic assessment: An evaluation of new development in the undergraduate midwifery curriculum. Nurse Education in Practice, 30, 1-6. DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.10.006
• Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S.O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J.A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475-514. DOI:10.3102/0002831215585562
• Svinicki, M.D. (2004). Authentic assessment: Testing in reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 100, 23-29 DOI:10.1002/tl.167
• Tombari, M.L., & Borich, G.D. (1999). Authentic assessment in the classroom: Applications and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Vu, T.T., & Alba, G.D. (2014). Authentic assessment for student learning: An ontological Conceptualisation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(7), 778-791. DOI:10.1080/0 0131857.2013.795110
• Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.19.57.3.16

Biblioteka Nauki

1967606