Priorities for the evaluation function of teacher education university students’ competency-based training

• Authors: Natal’ya D. Koletvinova , Ruben D. Flores

Abstracts

EN

The relevance of this problem is related to an insufficient degree of the development of the issue of identifying the evaluation function of the competence-based training of students. The research objective: to identify and systematize, on the basis of the functional analysis of the knowledge-resource capacity of the teacher’s professional polyfunctional activity, the priority components that can be considered as indicators of quality and effectiveness of the competency-based training. The leading technologies to the study of this problem are the technologies of mastering the types of speech activity with adequate speech design, aspect-integrated learning, self-activation, personality-oriented communication, etc. In the article there are reflected the results of this work, during which students mastered the characteristics of the professional communication as important indicators of the quality level of the professional communicative competency. The article contents can be useful for practical professional activity of teachers of higher education institutions and high school teachers.

Keywords

EN

presentation characteristic; conative characteristic; phatic characteristic; competency; interpretation; text; adequacy of speech design; integration relations; designing; monologue speech; dialogized communication

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 41
• Pages: 183-193

Dates

published

2015

Contributors

author

Natal’ya D. Koletvinova

author

Ruben D. Flores

References

• Afanasiev, D. V. & Gryzlov V. S. (2013) The competence-based approach and the credit-modular system of training. Higher education in Russia, 6, 11-18.
• Andreev, V. I. (2012) The retrospective and prognostic approaches to the development of the concept of the subject-oriented teacher education for creative self-development of students-future teachers. Education and self-development, 5(33).
• Castro, M. E., Niño A. & Muñoz-Caro C. (2009) GMAT. A software tool for the computation of the rovibrational g matrix. Computer Physics Communications, Vol.180, 7, 1183-1187.
• Conner, M. (2006) Andragogy + Pedagogy.-URL: http://agelesslearner.com/intros/andragogy.html.
• Efremova, N. F. (2012) Quality assessment as a guarantee of the competence-based learning of students. Higher education in Russia, 11, 119-125.
• Gabdilkhakov, V.F., A.M.Kalimullin (2014) Tutoring of pedagogical activity and new ideology of teacher training in the higher education institution. Life Science Journal, 11(11s), 183-187.
• Implementation of “Education and training 2010” work programme. (2010) Working group B: “Key Competences”. Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. A Europian Reference Framework. November. http://europa.eu.int/comm./education/policies/2010/doc/basicframe.pdf.
• Kamalova, L.A. (2015) Formation of Professional Competences of «Primary Education» Profile Students While the Studying Process at the University. Review of European Studies, 7(1), 94-100.
• Karavaeva, E. V. (2014) The recommended algorithm for designing higher education programs. Higher education in Russia, 8-9, 5-15.
• Kudryavtseva, E. (2012) Modern approaches to the problem of forming and using the competency models. Management consulting. Actual problems of the state and municipal management, 1, 166-177.
• McKenzie, J. (2001) How Teachers Learn Technology Best. The Educational Technology Journal, 10(6). http://fno.org/mar01/howlearn.html.
• Miller, G. A. (1990) Linguists, psychologists, and the cognitive science. Language, Vol.66, 2, 317-322.
• Prince, E. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. Radical pragmatics. N.Y., 223-235.
• Race, Ph. (1993) Never mind the teaching-feel the learning. SEDA Paper 80, June, Birmingham.
• Rbodes, F. T. (2001) The creation of the future: The role of the American university. Ithaca, 34.
• Sleeman, D. (1992) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press.
• Thagapsoev, Kh.G. (2013) Competency-based education: to the problem of the incarnation. Higher education in Russia, 6, 71-76.
• Vebter, E. V. & Safyannikov I.A. (2010) Project-Organised Learning Method in the System of Engineering Education of Russia by the Example of National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University. Second Ibero-American Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (PAEE’2010): Creating Meaningful Learning Environments. Barcelona, 97-100.
• Zakirova, V. G. & Koletvinova N. D. (2014) Paradigm of future primary school teachers’ vocational training. Life Science Journal, 11(4), 441-447.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2015.41.3.15

Biblioteka Nauki

2011753