Educational self-efficacy in teachers of various ethical orientations. The slovak research

• Authors: Krzysztof Rubacha , Mariana Sirotova , Mariola Chomczyńska-Rubacha

Abstracts

EN

The article provides an empirical analysis of a relationship between ethical orientations and educational self-efficacy. Ethical orientations are defined in the theoretical system of K. Gilligan, whereas self-efficacy is viewed through the social-cognitive theory. The results of the analysis of variance demonstrate the existence of statistically significant differences in self-efficacy between teachers who prefer the ethics of justice and those who prefer the ethics of care, in favour of the former. However, the Eta coefficient shows that the relationship strength is not very large. In conclusion of the result interpretation we explain what our research explicates and what lies beyond its capacity.

Keywords

EN

teachers; ethical orientations; educational self-efficacy; care and justice ethics

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 43
• Pages: 193-200

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Krzysztof Rubacha

author

Mariana Sirotova

author

Mariola Chomczyńska-Rubacha

References

• Bandura A. (1994). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change, in: R.F. Baumeister (ed.), The self in Social Psychology, Ann Arbor Press.
• Bussey K., Bandura A., (1999) Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation, „Psychological Review” 4.
• Chomczyńska-Rubacha M., K. Rubacha (2006), Poczucie własnej skuteczności nauczycieli.. Podstawy teoretyczne, pomiar i obszary badań. ”Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych” 2(3).
• Chomczyńska-Rubacha M., Rubacha K. (2013) Ethical orientation and sex in teachers with varied educational strategies. “The New Educational Research” Vol. 33 No 3.
• Chomczyńska-Rubacha M., Rubacha K. (2014) Ethical orientation of men and women in early, middle and late adulthood. “Edukacja Dorosłych” no. 1. Czyżowska D.(2012) Sprawiedliwość I troska. O sposobach rozwiązywania dylematów moralnych przez kobiety i mężczyzn. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Kraków.
• Gilligan C. (1998) Remembering Larry. Journal of Moral Education Vol. 27, No. 2.
• Gilligan C. (2003) In a different voice. Psychological theory and women`s development. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.
• Kohlberg L. (1984), The psychology of moral development. San Francisco CA, Harper & Row.
• Łukaszewski W. (1984), Szanse rozwoju osobowości, [Chances of personality development] PWN Warsaw.
• Michel W., Schoda Y., Peake P., (1988) The mature adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 54.
• Pervin L.A., John O.P. (2002) Osobowość-teorie i badania. Wydawnictwo UJ Kraków.
• Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahweh, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.16

Biblioteka Nauki

2005021