Teachers on the efficacy of support to students with learning difficulties

• Authors: Amalija Žakelj , Mara Cotič

Abstracts

EN

The empirical study investigated to what extent the implementation of the dPMAT model (a didactic approach to supporting pupils with learning difficulties in mathematics) contributed to the qualification of teachers for the implementation of support to pupils with learning difficulties in mathematics. 80 mathematics teachers and 101 generalist teachers completed a questionnaire through which they rated the impact of the dPMAT model on their knowledge and skills in relation to the teaching and learning of students with difficulties in learning mathematics. The mathematics teachers assessed the contribution of the model to their skills in the selection and design of appropriate teaching aids (M = 4.1, Sd = 0.8) and in the recognition and identification of learning difficulties the highest (M = 4.0, Sd = 0.8). The generalist teachers assessed the contribution of the model to their skills in facilitating the use of appropriate teaching aids the highest (M = 4.0, Sd = 1.1).

Keywords

EN

mathematics; learning difficulties; DPMAT model; recognition of learning difficulties; support measures; teachers’ competence

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 44
• Pages: 187-197

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Amalija Žakelj

author

Mara Cotič

References

• Ball, d.L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal. 90(4): 449-466.
• Bone, J., Colja, N. (2009). Uporaba številskega traku pri pouku matematike v luči fleksibilnega predmetnika. In: razpet, N. (ed.), od 0 do neskončnosti: jubilejni zbornik ob 60-letnici društva matematikov, fizikov in astronomov Slovenije. Ljubljana: dMFA, str. 109.
• Chudgar, A., Luschei, T.F. (2009). National Income Inequality and the Importance of Schools: A Hierarchical Cross–National Comparison. American educational research Journal; (46)3: 626-658.
• Čačinovič Vogrinčič, G. (2008). Soustvarjanje v šoli: učenje kot pogovor. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, zavod rS za šolstvo.
• Hill, H.C., Blunk, M.L., Charalambous C.y., Lewis J.M., Phelps G.C., Sleep L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction; 26(4): 430-511.
• Magajna, L., Kavkler, M., Čačinovič Vogrinčič G., Pečjak S., Bregar Golobič, K. (2007). Koncept dela: učne težave v osnovni šoli. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Urad za razvoj šolstva.
• Magajna, L., Pečjak, S., Pekla, J.C., Čačinovič Vogrinčič, G., Bregar Golobič, K., Kavkler, M., Tancig, S. (2008). Učne težave v osnovni šoli. Problemi, perspektive, priporočila. Ljubljana: zavod rS za šolstvo.
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington (dC): US department of education.
• Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.o., Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics report: Findings from IeA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill (MA): Boston College, TIMSS and PIrLS International Study Center.
• Piciga, d. (1995). Od razvojne psihologije k drugačenmu učenju in poučevanju. Nova Gorica: educa.
• Rugelj, M. (1996). Konstrukcija novih matematičnih pojmov. doktorsko delo. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.
• Schollaert, r. (2006). Pomen sprememb v izobraževanju. In: Vpeljevanje sprememb v šole – konceptualni vidik. zavod rS za šolstvo. Ljubljana.
• Sugman, B.L., ed. (2011). Učenci z učnimi težavami, Izvirni delovni projekt pomoči. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Fakulteta za socialno delo.
• Tomlinson, C.A. (2003). “differentiating instruction for academic diversity“. In: J.M. Cooper (ed.), Classroom teaching skills. 7th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 149-180.
• Wilkins, J.L., zembylas, M., Travers, K.J. (2002). Investigating correlates of mathematics and science literacy in the final year of secondary school. In: robitaille dF, Beaton Ae, ed. Secondary analysis of the TIMSS data. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 291-316.
• Žakelj, A. (2004). Procesno-didaktični pristop in razumevanje matematičnih pojmov v osnovni šoli. doktorska disertacija. Filozofska fakulteta Ljubljana.
• Žakelj, A. (2013). Pristopi učiteljev pri oblikah pomoči učencem z učnimi težavami pri matematiki = Teaching strategies for helping students with difficulties in learning mathematics. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, ISSN 1855-4431, Apr. 2013, year. 6, No. 1, pp. 5-25, Tables.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2016.44.2.15

Biblioteka Nauki

2004965