The Development of Deconstructive Learning History Model to Promote the Higher Order Thinking Skill of University Students

• Authors: - Sariyatun , Hermanu Joebagio , M. Humin , Nur Fatah Abid , Leo Agung Sutimin

Abstracts

EN

The presented research develops a deconstructive learning history model to promote the Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) of university students. According to Thiagarajan, Semmel, & Semmel’s (1974) approach, the model was developed in four stages: defining, design, development, and dissemination. The research participants were 120 students of the History Education Department, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia. The authors found the main problems related to the aspects of chronological thinking, students’ passive attitude, and the availability of learning path. Based on those problems, the author designed a deconstructive learning history model, consisting of four learning stages: problem statement, deconstruction, construction, and articulation. At the development and summative evaluation stages, the learning model proved feasible and effective in promoting the HOTS, thus, the learning model can solve the problems of time orientation and students’ passive attitude. Considering the findings and results of the research, the authors state that the learning model becomes a decisive factor in provoking students to reach the higher cognitive level in Bloom’s taxonomy.

Keywords

EN

higher order thinking skill; learning history; learning model; deconstructive

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 51
• Pages: 19-29

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

- Sariyatun

author

Hermanu Joebagio

author

M. Humin

author

Nur Fatah Abid

author

Leo Agung Sutimin

References

• Bolton, D.L. (2006). Exemplary uses of technology in education. The New Educational Review, 10(3), 227-244.
• Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S., & Chuensirimongkol, ]. (2015). Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(19), 2639-2652.
• Casagrand, I., & Semsar, K. (2017). Redesigning a course to help students achieve higher-order cognitive thinking skills: from goals and mechanics to student outcomes. Advances in Physiology Education, 41, 194-202.
• Collins, R. (2014). Skill for the 21St Century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum Leadership ]ournal: An electronic journal for leaders in education, 12(14).
• Counsell, C. (2002). Historical knowledge and historical skills: a distracting dichotomy. In ]. Arthur, & R. Phillips, Issues in History Teaching (pp. 54-71). London & New York: Routledge.
• Demircioglu, I.H. (2009). Analysis of Turkish secondary school history examination questions according to cognitive levels. The New Educational Review, 17(1), 295-304.
• Derrida, I. (1997). Of Grammatology, Corrected Edition. Baltimore & London: The ]ohn Hopkins University Press.
• Dorren, T. (2004). Singapore teachers’ characteristic of historical interpretation and inquiry: enhancing pedagogy and pupil’s historical understanding. International ]ournal of Historical Learning, Teaching, and Research, 4(2).
• Drake, F., & Brown, S. (2003). A systematic approach to improve students’ historical thinking. The History Teacher, 36(4).
• Drie, ]. V., & Boxtel, C. v. (2007). Historical reasoning: towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87-110.
• Duch, B.]. (2001). Writing problems for deeper understanding. In B.]. Duch, S.E. Groh, D.B. Allen, The Power of Problem-based Learning: A Practical “How To” for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline (pp. 47-58). Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
• Ercikan, K., & Seixas, P. (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking: The case of historical thinking. In G. Schraw, & D.H. Robinson, Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills (pp. 245-265).
• Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Ganapathy, M., Singh, M.K., Kaur, S., & Kit, L.W. (2014). Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skill Via Teaching Practices. 3L: The Southeast Asian ]ournal of English Languages Studies, 23(1), 75-85.
• Hopson, M.H., Simms, R.L., & Knezek, G.A. (2001). Using a Technology-Enriched Environment to Improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills. ]ournal of Research on Technology in education, 34(2), 109-119.
• Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1972). Models of Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Kim, E., & Seo, E.H. (2015). The effect of educational experiences on student learning outcomes in general education. The New Educational Review, 39(1), 167- 178.
• Mulcare, D., & Shwedel, A. (2017, April 3). Transforming Bloom‘ s taxonomy into classroom practice: A practical yet comprehensive approach to promote critical reading and student participation. [ournal of Political Science Education, 13(2), 121-137.
• Pattiz, A. (2004). The idea of history teaching: using Collingwood‘s idea of history to promote critical thinking in the high school history classroom. The History Teacher, 37(2).
• Pritchard, A., & Woollard, I. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: constructivism and social learning. London & New York: Routledge.
• Seixas, P., T.Morton, Colyer, I., & Fornazzari, S. (2013). The big six: Historical thinking concepts. Nelson Education.
• Seixas, P. (2017). Historical consciousness and Historical Thinking. In M. Carretero, S. Berger, & M. Grever, Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education (pp. 59-72). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Shalaby, M., & Milad, M. (2017). Flipping LOTS and HOTS in higher education blended contexts. International [ournal of Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 15-35.
• Tan, O.-S., Chye, S., & Teo, C.-T. (2009). Problem-based learning and creativity: a review of the literature. In O.-S.T. (Ed.), Problem-based Learning and Creativity (pp. 16-38). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.
• Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M.I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: a sourcebook. Indiana: Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped.
• Usher, R., & Edward, R. (2003). Postmodernism and Education: Different Voices, Different Worlds. Routledge: London & New York.
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge & London: The MIT Press.
• Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in Education. Rotterdam & Taipei: Sense Publishers.
• Weay, A.L., & Masood, M. (2014). The potential benefits of Multimedia information representation in enhancing students’ critical thinking and history reasoning. International ]ournal of Social, Education, Economics, and Management Engineering, 8(12), 3589-3592.
• Weay, A.L., Masood, M., & Abdullah, S.H. (2016). Systematic Review of Revised Bloom Taxonomy, SOLO Taxonomy, and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) in Assessing Students‘ Historical Understanding in Learning History. Malaysian [ournal of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Education, 1-27.
• White, H. (2008). The historical event. Differences: A [ournal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 19(2), 9-34.
• Yen, T.S., & Halili, S.H. (2015). Effective Teaching of Higher-Order Thinking (HOT) in Education. The Online [ournal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41-47.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2018.51.1.01

Biblioteka Nauki

1972187