The Effect of the Type of the Finished High School on the Nature Relatedness of Pre-service Primary Teachers

• Authors: Roman Kroufek , Miriam Uhrinová , Vlastimil Chytrý

Abstracts

EN

The paper deals with an individual’s nature relatedness and a selected significant variable which may have an effect on it; especially it researches the studied high school relation to nature relatedness in primary school teacher trainees. It is research in quantitative design, using a questionnaire to collect data. The questionnaire was based on the Nature Relatedness Scale. Results show a significant effect of the type of high school finished on students’ nature relatedness. The highest scores in the construct analysed were obtained in nature and science- oriented branches, the lowest by graduates of social sciences and general grammar schools. Such results confirm the significance of education in natural science in forming a positive attitude to nature and disprove the cliché ideas of polytechnics producing environmentally insensitive graduates.

Keywords

EN

nature relatedness; primary school; environmental literacy

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 54
• Pages: 231-243

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Roman Kroufek

• University of J. E. Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem

author

Miriam Uhrinová

• Catholic university in Ružomberok

author

Vlastimil Chytrý

• University of J. E. Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem

References

• Bartlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., & Higgins, C.C. (2001). Organizational Research: determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19 (1), 43 – 50.
• Bragg, E., Wood, C., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8 – 12: A robust methodology for the RSPB. University of Essex.
• Capaldi, C.A., Dopko, R.L., & Zelenski, J.M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1 – 15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976.
• Chawla, L. (1998). Significant Life Experiences Revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4 (4), 369 – 382.
• Cheng, N.Y.I., & So, W.M.W. (2015). Teachers’ environmental literacy and teaching stories of three Hong Kong primary school teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24 (1), 58 – 79.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Craig, J.M., Logan, A.C., & Prescott, S.L. (2016). Natural environments, nature relatedness and the ecological theater: connecting satellites and sequencing to shinrin-yoku. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 35 (1).
• Dean, J.H., Shanahan, D.F., Bush, R., Gaston, K.J., Lin, B.B., Barber, E., Franco, L., & Fuller, R.A. (2018). Is Nature Relatedness Associated with Better Mental and Physical Health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (7), 1371. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071371.
• Dunlap, R.E. (2008). The New environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40 (1), 3 – 18.
• Dunlap, R.E., & Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9 (4), 10 – 19.
• Franěk, M. (2012). Nature Relatedness Scale. Envigogika, 7 (1), 1 – 10. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.69.
• Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., & Tomera, A.N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research and responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18 (2), 1 – 8.
• Hollweg, K.S. Taylor, J.R., Bybee, R.W., Marcinkowski, T.J., McBeth, W.C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
• Hungerford, H.R., Volk, T., Wilke, R., Champeau, R., Marcikowski, T., May, T., Bluhm, W., & McKeown-Ice, R. (1994). Environmental Literacy Framework. Environmental Education Literacy Consorcium. Cardonbale, Illinois:, University of South Illinois.
• Janovec, J., Kroufek, R., Chytrý, V., & Dolejšová, J. (2016). Qualitative view on environmental and technological literacy of pre-service primary teachers. INTED 2016 proceedings. Valencia: IATED.
• Kellert, S., & Wilson, E.O. (eds.). (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: Shearwater Books, 484 p.
• Kroufek, R., & Chytrý, V. (2015). The nature relatedness of the undergraduate students in the Czech Republic. ICERI 2015 proceedings. Seville: IATED.
• Liefländer, A.K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F.X., & Schultz, P.W. (2013) Promoting connected ness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19 (3), 370 – 384.
• Mayer, F.S., & Frantz, C.M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (4), 503 – 515.
• Morse, D.T. (1999). Minsize2: A computer program for determining effect size and minimum sample for statistical significance for univariate, multivariate, and nonparametric tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 (3), 518 – 531.
• E.K. (2011). A Nature Relatedness Intervention to Promote Happiness and Environmental Concern. Ottawa, Ontario: Carleton University.
• Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M., & Murphy, S.A. (2009). The Nature relatedness scale. Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41 (5), 715 – 740.
• Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M., & Murphy, S.A. (2011). Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), 303 – 322.
• Nisbet, E.K., & Zelenski, J.M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22 (9), 1101 – 1106.
• Nisbet, E.K., & Zelenski, J.M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1 – 11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
• Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M., & Murphy, S.A. (2011). Happiness Is in Our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), 303 – 322.
• Perkins, H.E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (4), 455 – 463.
• Peyton, R., & Miller, B. (1980). Developing an internal locus of control as a prerequisite to environmental action taking. In Sacks, A. et al. (Eds.) Current issues VI: The yearbook of environmental education and environmental studies. Columbus: ERIC, 173 – 192.
• Restall, B., & Condrad, E. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264 – 278.
• Robinson, D., H., & Levin, J.R. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26 (5), 21 – 27.
• Robottom, I., Malone, K., & Walker, R. (2000). Case studies in environmental education: Policy and practice. Geelong Vic Australia: Deakin University Press.
• Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L., & Rubin, D.B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
• Roth, C.E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its Roots, Evolution and Directions in the 1990s. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.
• Říčan, J. (2016). Metakognice a metakognitivní strategie jako teoretické a výzkumné kon strukty a jejich platnění v moderní pedagogické praxi (Metacognition and metacognitive strategies as theoretical and research constructs and their application in modern pedagogical practice). Most: Hněvín.
• Schultz, P.W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Schmuck, P., & Schultz, W.P. (Eds.). Psychology of sustainable development. Norwell: Kluwer Academic, 62 – 78.
• Sheskin, D.J. (2007). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
• Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Statsoft (2015). Statistica 12. Retrieved from http://www.statsoft.cz/.
• Thomas, J.R., & Nelson, J.K. (2001). Research methods in physical activity. (4th). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 157 p.
• Windhorst, E., & Williams, A. (2015). Growing Up, Naturally: The Mental Health Legacy of Early Nature Affiliation. Ecopsychology, 7 (3), 115 – 125.
• Zelenski, J.M., Dopko, R.L., & Capaldi, C.A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24 – 31.
• Zelnski, J.M. & Nisbet, E.K. (2014). Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46 (1), 3 – 23.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2018.54.4.19

Biblioteka Nauki

1969033