A Role of Critical Questions in Preparing a Scientific Article

• Authors: Stanisław Juszczyk

Abstracts

EN

The article discusses a hermeneutical analysis of academic texts related to the methodological criticism of individual elements of the structure of designed quantitative research, published in the form of articles, chapters in collective works and monographs. Dilemmas of researchers constructing research projects, asking themselves critical questions at each stage of a research procedure, will be described, critical situations for the correctness of a research process, and also general methodological requirements of scientific publications will be indicated. Besides the description of a critical approach of chosen researchers, the work also includes the author’s reflections on carrying out empirical research.

Keywords

EN

critical questions; hermeneutical analysis; scientific criticism

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 54
• Pages: 261-269

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Stanisław Juszczyk

• University of Silesia in Katowice

References

• Boswell C., Cannon S. (2011). Introduction to Nursing Research: Incorporating Evidence Based Practice, 2nd ed., Critique process, chapter 13. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Burns N., Grove S.K. (2001). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, and Utilization (4th). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
• Carter K. (2006). How to Critique Research [Online, course materials]. Available at: http//www.runet.edu/~kcarter/CourseInfo/nurs442/chapter12.htm (22.03.2016).
• CyberNurse (2005). Reading and critiquing research [online]. Available at: http://www.cybernurse.org.uk/research/reading_and_Critiquing_Research.htm (20.02.1018).
• Daggett L., Harbaugh B.L., Collum L. (2005). A Worksheet for Critiquing Quantitative Nursing Research. Nurse Educator, 30(6), pp. 255 – 258
• Holder B. (2003). The Research Critique [Online]. Available at: http://virtual.clemenson,edu/group/odce/summer1_03/nursT807/pdf. (24.04.2015).
• Juszczyk S. ( 2011). The scientific development of the researcher in the process of shaping his scientific identity. “The New Educational Review”, Vol. 26 (4), pp. 17 – 32.
• Polit D.F., Beck C.T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Rosenthal R. (1991). Replication in behavioral research. In: J.W. Neuliep, ed., Replication Research in Behavioral Sciences, 1 – 30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Rodger B.L. (1997). Guidelines for Critique of Research Reports [Online, course materials]. Available at: http://www.uwm.edu/~brodg/Handout/critique.htm. (24.04.2016).
• Valente S. (2003). Critical Analysis of Research Papers. Journal for Nurses in StaffDevelopment, 196(3), pp. 130 – 142.
• Vance D.E., Talley M., Azuero A., Pearce P.F., Christian B.J. (2013) Conducting an article critique for a quantitative research study: perspectives for doctoral students and other novice readers, Nursing Research and Reviews, 3, pp. 67 – 75.
• Voelker D.H., Orton P.Z. (1993). Cliff’s Quick Review of Statistics. Lincoln: CliffNotes.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2018.54.4.21

Biblioteka Nauki

1969027