Digital-Based Living Values Project Activities Learning Model for Strengthening Students’ Pancasila Character

• Authors: Kokom Komalasari , Aim Abdulkarim , Pitria Sopianingsih

Abstracts

EN

This study aims to describe the conceptual model of digital-based living values activities project learning, students’ perceptions of implementing this model, and the reinforcement of students’ Pancasila character. The research utilised a mixed methods approach on students and teachers at junior high schools in Bandung, Indonesia. The findings reveal that the digital-based living values activities project learning model integrates project-based learning, living values education and digital learning. Students perceived the implementation of this model quite positively, and the reinforcement of students’ Pancasila character was categorised as good. This model can be used to strengthen students’ character.

Keywords

EN

digital learning; living values activities; project-based learning; Pancasila student’s character; civic education

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 75
• Pages: 127-139

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Kokom Komalasari

• Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000000163705639

author

Aim Abdulkarim

• Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000000221542920

author

Pitria Sopianingsih

• Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000000224872589

References

• Baker, E., et al. (2011). Project-based learning model relevant learning for the 21st century. Pacific Education Institute.
• Ball, A. (2016). Exploring 21st century skills and learning environments for middle school youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1), 1–15.
• Bell, S. (2020). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
• Binkley, M., et al. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skill. Springer.
• Burdick, A., & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 546–556.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
• Dyer, L., & Reeves, T. (1995). Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3).
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate in research. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
• Houx, L. (2017, May 11). Digital learning: Data, trends, and strategies you need to know. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-netework/2017/may/11/digital-learninghow-to-keep-your-students-switched-on
• Indrawadi, J., Komalasari, K., & Winarno Luthfi, Z. F. (2023). Blended learning: How can multimedia enhance students’ characters? New Educational Review, 71, 63–77.
• Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it is here to stay. Corwin Press, Inc.
• Komalasari, K. (2012). The living values-based contextual learning to develop the students’ character. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 246–251.
• Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2017). Value-based interactive multimedia development through integrated practice for the formation of students’ character. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Special Issue (IETC), 912–919.
• Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2022). Pendidikan karakter: Konsep dan aplikasi living values education (Edisi revisi) [Character education: Concept and application of living values education (Revised edition)]. Refika Aditama.
• Komalasari, K., Fitriasari, S., & Anggraini, D. N. (2021). Living values-based digital learning resources in civic education. New Educational Review, 63, 85–96.
• Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970) Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.
• Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
• Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 22 of 2020 (The Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Education and Culture for the Year 2020–2024).
• Peters, O. (2000). Digital learning environments: New possibilities and opportunities. Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1–19.
• Rodgers, D. (2017, September 22). Schoology exchange. https://www.schoology.com/blog/digital-learning-data-trends-and-strategies-you-needknow
• Saripudin, D., & Komalasari, K. (2015). Living values education in school’s habituation program and its effect on student’s character development. The New Educational Review, 39(1), 51–62.
• Saripudin, D., Komalasari, K., & Anggraini, D. N. (2021). Value-based digital storytelling learning media to foster student character. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 369–384.
• Shadish, C., & Campbell. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental design for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage Publications, Inc.
• Tillman, D. (2004). Living values: Activities for children ages 8–14. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. JosseyBass.
• Vermeulen, M., Kreijns, K., Van Buuren, H., & Acker, F. V. (2016). The role of transformative leadership, ICT infrastructure and learning climate in teachers use of digital learning materials during their classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1427–1440.
• Zwart, D. P., & Luit, J. E. H. Van, Noroozi, O., & Goei, S. L. (2017). The effects of digital learning material on student’s mathematics learning in vocational education. Cogent Education, 29(1), 1–10.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2024.75.1.10

Biblioteka Nauki

29520518