Measurement of Lecturer Satisfaction

• Authors: Ariesya Aprillia , Rony Setiawan , Nonie Magdalena

Abstracts

EN

The aim of this research is to analyze the extent of lecturers’ satisfaction with regard to the gap between the satisfaction experienced and what is expected. The sample in this study were lecturers at one of a Private Higher Education institution in Bandung, Indonesia. Sampling was done using simple random sampling techniques. This study uses the Focus Group Discussion method. The instrument test uses validity and reliability tests, and the data analysis used in this study is Importance and Performance Analysis. Referring to the results of data processing, it was found that there were 4 out of 27 indicators in Quadrant I where the lecturer felt that the existence of indicators was considered very important, while the level of performance was still not satisfactory. Indicators that are considered not yet optimum are the provision of communication channels between leaders and lecturers, daycare facilities, clean eating places/ food courts, and resources for research that is not yet optimum. The outcomes of this research are considered to give positive feedback and positive feed forward to the Private Higher Education regarding service programs oriented to employees.

Keywords

EN

importance performance analysis; lecturer satisfaction

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 60
• Pages: 178-190

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Ariesya Aprillia

• Maranatha Christian University

author

Rony Setiawan

• Maranatha Christian University

author

Nonie Magdalena

• Maranatha Christian University

References

• Aprillia, A., Setiawan, R., & Munthe, R.G. (2017). Testing of management commitment as antecendents of prosocial service behavior with job satisfaction as mediating variable. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15 (19), 511-519. Retrieved 03/04/2018 from http://www.serialsjournals.com/serialjournalmanager/ pdf/1518168020
• Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & & Bano, S. (2018). Total quality management: A framework for higher education institution. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6 (1), 124-141. Retrieved 11/08/2018 from https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=googlescholar&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA18163715&sid=classroomWidget&asid=30c43e94
• Brown, D. & Sargeant, M.A. (2007). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and religious commitment of full-time university employees. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 16 (2), 211-241. doi: 10.1080/10656210701647613
• Chen, S.H., Yang, C.C., Shiau, J.Y., & Wang, H.H. (2006). The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18 (5), 484-500. doi: 10.1108/0954478061068546
• Comm, C.L. & Mathaisel, D.F.X. (2000). Assesing employee satisfaction in service firms: An example in higher education. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 6 (1), 43-53.
• Eyupoglu, S.Z. & Saner, T. (2009). Job satisfaction: Does rank make a difference? African Journal of Business Management, 3 (10), 609-615. doi: 10.5897/AJBM09.157
• Hair, J.R., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Khalid, S., Irshad, M.Z., & Mahmood, B. (2012). Job satisfaction among academic staff: A comparative analysis between public and private sector universities of Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 7 (1), 126-136. doi: 10.5539/ ijbm.v7n1p126
• Oshagbemi, T. & Hickson, C. (2003). Some aspects of overall job satisfaction: A binomial logit model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18 (4), 357-367. doi: 10.1108/02 683940310473109
• Platsidou, M. & Diamantopoulou, G. (2009). Job satisfaction of Greek University professors: Is it affected by demographic factors, academic rank and problems of higher education? In G.K. Zarifis (Ed.), Educating the Adult Educator: Quality Provision and Assessment in Europe. Conference Proceedings, ESREA-ReNAdET, Thessaloniki: Grafima Publications. Retrieved 11/27/2018 from http://users.uom.gr/~platsidu/Job sat…on of Greek university professors.pdf.
• Saba, I. (2011). Measuring the job satisfaction level of the academic staffin Bahawalpur College. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(1). Retrieved 11/27/2018 from http://hrmars.com/admin/pics/9.pdf
• Sadeghi. A. & Pihie, Z.A.L. (2013). The role of transformational leadership style in enhancing lecturers’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Social Sci190 Ariesya Aprillia, Rony Setiawan, Nonie Magdalena ence, 4 (8), 264-271. Retrieved 27/11/2018 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2da2/ d53a83c842462886db33443e251406eda7c6.pdf
• Saner, T. & Eyupoglu, S.Z. (2012). The age and job satisfaction relationship in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 1020-1026. doi: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2012.09.59
• Sharma, R.D. & Jyoti, J. (2009). Job satisfaction of university teachers: An empirical study. Journal of Services Research, 9 (2), 51-80. Retrieved 11/27/2018 from https://www. researchgate.net/publication/286142423
• Smerek, R.E. & Peterson, M. (2006). Examining Herzberg’s theory: Improving job satisfaction among non-academic employees at a university. Research in Higher Education, 48 (2), 229-250. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9042-3
• Toker, B. (2011). Job satisfaction of academic staff: An empirical study on Turkey. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(2), 156-169. doi: 10.1108/09684881111125050
• Vojáčková, L. (2020). Key motivational factors affecting teacher’s long-term engagement in school projects. The New Educational Review, 59 (1), 24-34. doi: 10.15804/ tner.2020.59.1.02
• Yilmaz, S.M., Celebi, C.D., & Cakmak, E. (2014). Job satisfaction level of academicians in Faculty of Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1021-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.339.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.20.60.2.14

Biblioteka Nauki

1963532