Impact of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Technique on Enhancing Kuwait English Language Student- teachers’ Speaking Skills

• Authors: Wafaa Salem Al-Yaseen

Abstracts

EN

This quasi-experiment examined the impact of the jigsaw cooperative learning technique on enhancing the speaking skill of Kuwaiti student-teachers of English. In the first semester of 2019/2020, 40 female students enrolled in a Conversation Course were divided equally into control and experimental groups based on an oral presentation task (pre-test). Data was assessed through a speaking skill competency rubric (vocabulary, accuracy, fluency, and pronunciation). The post-test results indicated statistically significant differences between the means of the participants in favor of the experimental group. A pre-post experiment questionnaire was also administered to identify students’ attitudes towards the jigsaw technique. SPSS program was used for data analysis. The t-test results showed a positive attitude of the experimental group towards cooperative learning and the jigsaw technique. It isrecommended to use the jigsaw technique to improve students’ speaking skills.

Keywords

EN

Cooperative Learning; Jigsaw Technique; English Student-teachers; Speaking Skill; Kuwait

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 61
• Pages: 119-143

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Wafaa Salem Al-Yaseen

• Kuwait University

References

• Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1),71-94.
• Bailin, S. (1995). Is critical thinking biased? Clarifications and implications, Educational Theory, 45(2), 191- 197.
• Brookfield, S. (1991). On ideology, pillage, language and risk: Critical thinking and the tensions of critical practice, Studies in Continuing Education, 13(1), 1- 14.
• California Critical Thinking Skills Test 2000 test manual. (2008). Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.
• Canagarajah, A.S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
• Clark, R., &Gieve, S.N. (2006). On the discursive construction of ‘the Chinese learner’. Language Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 54-73.
• Dong, T., Anderson, R.C., Kim, I., & Li, Y. (2008). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 400-424.
• Dong, Y. (2015). Critical thinking education with Chinese characteristics. In M. Davies, & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 351-368). New York: Springer.
• Facione, P.A, Facione, N.C,&Giancarlo,C.A.(2001). California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory: Inventory Manual Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, Fisher, A.. (2011). Critical Thinking: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Fishman, A. (1988) Amish literacy. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
• Grosser, M.M. & Lombard, B.J.J. (2008). The relationship between culture and the development of critical thinking abilities of prospective teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1364-1375.
• Heng, T.T. (2016). Different is not deficient: Contradicting stereotypes of Chinese international students in US higher education. Studies in Higher Education,43(1), 1-15.
• He, H., Zhang, Y.M., & Zhao, Y.Q. (2006). [A survey of critical thinking ability in college students]. Chinese Nursing Research, 20(3), 775-776.
• Hofstede, G.H. (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Huang Yuanshen.(2010). The English Curriculum must be thoroughly reformed - on “Speculative Absence”. [J]. Foreign Language World (1), 11-16.
• McBride, R.E., Xiang, P., Wittenberg, D. & Shen, J. (2002). An analysis of preservice teachers’ dispositions toward critical thinking: A cross-cultural perspective, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 131-140.
• McGuire, J.M. (2007). Why has the critical thinking movement not come to Korea? Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 224-232.
• Norris, S.P. (1985). Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educational Leadership. 42(8), 40-45.
• Paton, M. (2005). Is critical analysis foreign to Chinese students? In E. Manalo & G.Wong Toi (Eds.),Communication skills in university education: The internationaldimension (pp. 1-11). Auckland:Pearson Education.
• Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.
• Tan, C. (2017a) Thinking critically about liberal arts education: Yale-NUS College in Singapore, In: P. Marber & D. Araya (Eds) The Evolution of Liberal Arts in the Global Age. (pp.127- 140). New York: Routledge.
• Tan, C. (2017b). The enactment of the policy initiative for critical thinking in Singapore schools. Journal of Education Policy, 1-16.
• Turner, Y. (2006) Students from mainland China and critical thinking in postgraduate Business and Management degrees: Teasing out tensions of culture, style and substance, International Journal of Management Education, 5(1), 3-11.
• Wan, G. (2001). The learning experience of Chinese students in American universities: Across-cultural perspective. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED439653
• Watson, G.B., & Glaser, E.M. (1994).Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal Form Smanual.San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
• Yudan, Yudan’s understanding of Analects of Confucius. [M]Zhonghua Book Company Press 1st ed. Beijing, 2006.
• Yang, Y. (2016). Lessons learnt from contextualizing a UK teaching thinking program in a conventional Chinese classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 198-209.
• Zhu, X.L., Feng, W.H., & Yan, W.H. (2005). [Testing critical thinking ability among college nursing students]. Chinese Nursing Research, 20(1), 84-86.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.20.61.3.10

Biblioteka Nauki

1963606