Framework for Assessment the Quality of Digital Learning Resources for Personalized Learning

• Authors: Maria Leshchenko , Yuliana Lavrysh , Natalia Kononets

Abstracts

EN

The paper presents the framework for the assessment of digital educational resources for students who are engaged in autonomous personalized learning. Through a questionnaire and personal observations, we identified the necessity to equip students with skills and knowledge on resources quality assessment in terms of digital competence advancement. We adapted the framework that includes four components: pedagogical, technological, didactic and academic and expanded their content. Having analyzed the students’ narratives on their resources application experience, questionnaires answers and results of the personal assessment process, we observed the positive dynamic in mastering the skills of resources quality assessment after the implementation of the framework into the learning process. We suggest the algorithm of the framework implementation.

Keywords

EN

personalized learning; digital learning resources; digital competence; language learning; instruction design

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 64
• Pages: 148-159

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Maria Leshchenko

• Jan Kochanowski University

author

Yuliana Lavrysh

• National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

author

Natalia Kononets

• Poltava University of Economics and Trade

References

• Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2010). New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning. In M.J. Luzon, M.N. Ruiz-Madrid, & M.L. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital genres, new literacies and autonomy in language learning (pp. 63-80). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
• Castellano, J., Mynard, J., Rubesch, T. (2011). Student technology use in a self-access center. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 12-27.
• Fang, F., Zhang, L. (2012). Teachers’ roles in promoting students’ learner autonomy in China. English Language teaching, 5, 51-56.
• Furnborough, C. (2012). Making the most of others: Autonomous interdependence in adult beginner distance language learners. Distance Education, 33(1), 99-116.
• Gamble, C., Aliponga, J., Wilkins, M., Koshiyama, Y., Yoshida, K., & Ando, S. (2012). Examining Learner Autonomy Dimensions: Students’ Perceptions of Their Responsibility and Ability. In A. Stewart & N. Sonda (Eds.), JALT2011 Conference Proceedings (pp. 263-272). Tokyo: JALT.
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Riding the digital wilds: Learner autonomy and informal language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 8-25.
• Leshchenko, M.,Tymchuk,L., Pavlenko,N., Ruban,L.(2020). Democratic values and digital skills of students in higher educational establishments of Poland and Ukraine. Advanced Education,15, 105-115.
• Mhouti, A., Nasseh,A., Erradi, M. (2013). How to evaluate the quality of digital learning resources? International journal of computer science research and application, 3, 27-36.
• Reinders, H., White, C.J.. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Language, Learning and Technology, 15, 1-3.
• Sefton-Green, J. (2019). Towards a cultural history of digital autodidacticism: changing cultural narratives of education. Perspectiva, 37, 125-139.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.21.64.2.12

Biblioteka Nauki

1964269