Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 67 | 172-182

Article title

Smart Maps Indonesia Based on Augmented Reality as Digital Learning Resources of Social Studies

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This research develops AR in the form of Smart Indonesia Maps, which display information about natural features, geography, flora and fauna, culture, and social life on Indonesian islands in real-time. The objective of this research was to develop an AR-based Smart Indonesia Maps model as a digital learning resource in social studies learning. Embracing a Research and Development model has completed the preliminary field-testing stage of all ten stages of research. Limited trials were undertaken at state/private junior high schools in Bandung City, Bandung Regency, and West Bandung Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia, with the students and teachers as the research subjects. The data collection techniques included observation, interviews, document studies, focus group discussions, and attitude scale questionnaires. The results demonstrate that: Smart Indonesia Maps consist of main material objects by revealing the culture of the five major islands in Indonesia. The production of the model constituted three stages, namely pre-production, production, and post-production. The model was quite effective in fostering student critical thinking and creativity.

Year

Volume

67

Pages

172-182

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

References

  • Alvermann, D. E. (1998). Imagining the possibilities. In D. E. Alvermann, K. A. Hinchman, D. W. Moore, S. F. Phelps, & D. R. Waff(Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (pp. 353-372). Erlbaum.
  • Azuma R. A Survey of Augmented Reality. (1997). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-388. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  • Azuma, R., et al. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
  • Bera, S., & Liu, M. (2006). Cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 295-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.05.001
  • Borg & Gall. (2003). Education Research. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Cerqueira, C. S., & Kirner, C. (2012). Developing Educational Applications with a Non-Programming Augmented Reality Authoring Tool. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2816-2825.
  • Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of computing in higher education, 7(2), 3-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02948592
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate in Research. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Geer, R., & Sweeney, T.-A. (2012). Students Voice about Learning with Technology. Journal of Social Sciences,8(2), 294-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2012.294.303
  • Gibbons, S. (2007). Redefining the roles of Information professionals in Higher education to engage the net generation. EDUCAUSE, Australasia. http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia07/authors_papers/Gibbons2.pdf
  • Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. John Wiley and Sons. Inc.
  • Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British educational research journal, 36(3), 503-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
  • Hoskins, B., & Crick, R. D. (2010). Competences for learning to learn and active citizenship: different currencies or two sides of the same coin? European Journal of Education, 45(1), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01419.x
  • Ivanova, G., Aliev, Y., & Ivanov, A. (2014). Augmented reality. Textbook for future blended education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, 14, 130-136.
  • Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2017). A Model of Living Values Education-Based Civic Education Textbooks in Indonesia. The New Educational Review, 63(1), 139-150. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.11
  • Komalasari, K. & Rahmat. (2019). Living Values Based Interactive Multimedia in Civic Education Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1218a
  • Komalasari, K., Fitriasari, S., & Anggraini., D. N. (2021). Living Values-Based Digital Learning Resources in Civic Education. The New Educational Review, 63(1), 27-37. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2021.63.1.07
  • Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234
  • Madden, L. (2011). Professional Augmented Reality Browsers for Smartphones: Programming for Junaio, Layar & Wikitude. Wiley Publishing, Inc.
  • Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEULit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. ITALICS: Innovations in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
  • Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “digital society”. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Introduction: Digital literacies- concepts, policies and practices (pp. 151-176). Peter Lang.
  • Moje, E. B. (2002a). But where are the youth? On the value of integrating youth culture into literacy theory. Educational Theory, 52(1), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17415446.2002.00097.x
  • Moje, E. B. (2002b). Re-framing adolescent literacy research for new times: Studying youth as a resource. Reading Research and Instruction, 41, 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558367
  • Neumann, D. L., Neumann, M. M., & Hood, M. (2011). Evaluating computer-based simulations, multimedia and animations that help integrate blended learning with lectures in first year statistics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.970
  • Palmer, S. (2007). An evaluation of streaming digital video resources in on- and off-campus engineering management education. Computers & Education, 49(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.002
  • Rich, E. (2010). How do you define 21st-century learning? https://www.edweek.org/tsb/articles/2010/10/12/01panel.h04.html
  • Saidin, N. F., Halim, N. D. A., & Yahaya, N. (2015). A review of research on augmented reality in education: advantages and applications. International education studies, 8(13), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1
  • Saripudin, D., Komalasari, K., & Anggraini, D. N. (2021). Value-Based Digital Storytelling Learning Media to Foster Student Character. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14221a
  • Singhal, S., Bagga, S., Goyal, P., & Saxena, V. (2012). Augmented Chemistry: Interactive Education System. International Journal of Computer Applications. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/7700-1041
  • Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2011). Effects of technology Immersion on Middle School Students’ Learning Opportunities and Achievement. The Journal Educational Research, 104, 299-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671003767615
  • Schwertner, K. (2017). Digital Transformation of Business Models. Trakia Journal of Science, 15(1), 388-393. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2018-0011
  • Tomi, A. B., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2013). An interactive mobile augmented reality magical playbook: Learning number with the thirsty crow. Procedia computer science, 25, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.015
  • Villagomez, G. (2010). Augmented Reality. University of Kansas.
  • Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C., (2013). The Use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12020
  • Yeo, J., & Tan, S. C. (2008). Constructive use of authoritative sources in science meaning making. International conference on learning sciences, Utrecht, The Netherland.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2034202

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_tner_22_67_1_13
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.