Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 71 | 180-192

Article title

How Does the Regulatory Focus Affect Problem-Solving Among Undergraduate Students?

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The current study aimed to explore the effect of regulatory Focus – Promotion vs. Prevention – in problem-solving among undergraduate students at The Hashemite University. The hypotheses were that promotion focus students outperform prevention focus students in ill-structured problems but underperform them in well-structured problems, and prevention focus students outperform promotion focus students in well-structured problems but underperform them in ill-structured problems. The participants (n=170) were allocated into four groups according to their mindsets and the problems assigned to them (promotion with ill-structured problems, promotion with well-structured problems, prevention with ill-structured problems, prevention with well-structured problems). After the groups solved all the assigned problems, their work was scored according to Measuring Problem Solving Instrument MPSI. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that the regulatory focus affects how problems are solved.

Year

Volume

71

Pages

180-192

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • The Hashemite University, Jordan

References

  • Baas, M., & De Dreu, C., & Nijstad, B. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794–809. DOI: 10.1037/a0022981
  • Babik, I., Cunha, A. B., Ross, S. M., Logan, S. W., Galloway, J. C., & Lobo, M. A. (2019). Means-end problem solving in infancy: Development, emergence of intentionality, and transfer of knowledge. Developmental Psychobiology, 61(2), 191–202. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21798
  • Beuk, F., & Basadur, T. (2016). Regulatory focus, task engagement, and divergent thinking. Creativity & Innovation Management, 25(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12182
  • Brandell, J. R. (1997). Theory and Practice in Clinical Social Work. Simon and Schuster.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1, 185– 216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
  • Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T., & Low, M. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7
  • D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2004). Social Problem Solving: Theory and Assessment. In E. C. Chang, T. J. D’Zurilla, & L. J. Sanna (Eds.), Social problem solving: Theory, research, and training (pp. 11–27). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10805-000
  • Eskin, M., Akyol, A., Çelik, E. Y., & Gültekin, B. K. (2013). Social problem-solving, perceived stress, depression and life-satisfaction in patients suffering from tension type and migraine headaches. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 337–343. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12056
  • Funke, J., Fischer, A., Holt, D.V. (2018). Competencies for Complexity: Problem Solving in the Twenty-First Century. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_3
  • Grohs, J. R., Kirk, G. R., Soledad, M. M., & Knight, D. B. (2018). Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  • Higgins, E.T., Friedman, R., Harlow, R., Idson, L., Ayduk, O., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27
  • Hui, L.J. (2021). Motivation and creativity: Effects of Perspective-taking, regulatory focus and dispositional empathy on creative problem solving. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/195768
  • Kipman, U. (2020). Komplexes problemlösen. Springer.
  • Lalot, F., Gollwitzer, P., Quiamzade, A., & Oettingen, G. (2022). Boosted by closure! Regulatory focus predicts persistence and effort mobilisation in the aftermath of task-unrelated goal closure. European journal of social psychology, 52(5–6), 944–962.
  • Liu, H., Yao, M., Li, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). The relationship between regulatory focus and learning engagement among Chinese adolescents. Educational Psychology, 39(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1618441
  • Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
  • Lynch, C., Wolcott, S. & Huber, G. (2000). Tutorial for optimizing and documenting openended problem-solving skills. http://www.wolcottlynch.com/tutorial.html
  • Park, S., & Jang, S. (2010). Critical factors influencing problem-solving ability in online learning environment. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/72996/1/vol19_2.pdf
  • Peng, J., Cao, F., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Zhang, Y, Zhu, X., & Miao, D. (2019). Reflections on motivation: How regulatory focus influences self-framing and risky decision making. Current Psychology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00217-w
  • Robertson, S. I. (2001). Problem-solving. Psychology Press.
  • Sassenrath, C., Sassenberg, K., & Scheepers, D. (2016). The impact of regulatory focus on challenge and threat. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 75(2), 91–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000175
  • Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
  • Smithson, M. (2012). The positive impact of personal goal setting on assessment. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(3), 57–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i3.61
  • Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. (2012). Psychology applied to teaching (13th Ed.). Wadesworth, Cengage Learning.
  • Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Wang, D., Hao, L., Zhou, M., Maguire, P., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., … & Su, X. (2019). Making decisions for oneself and others: How regulatory focus influences the ‘decision maker role effect’ for intertemporal choices. Personality & Individual Differences, 149, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.034
  • Wang, L., Cui, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Du, K., & Luo, Z. (2021). Regulatory Focus, Motivation, and Their Relationship with Creativity Among Adolescents. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 666071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666071
  • Wang, L., Yang, D, Cui, Y., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., & Luo, Z. (2022). Regulatory focus and creativity: Adaptive-innovative cognitive style as a mediator and school climate as a moderator. Psychology and School. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22819
  • Watling, C. Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2012). Understanding responses to feedback: the potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Medical Education, 46(6), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04209.x
  • Weltman, R. E., & Wolfson, W. (1964). The effects of externally imposed and selfstated goals on the functioning of chronic schizophrenics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(4), 436–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(196410)20:43.0.CO;2-K
  • Zaytoun, A. (2004). Methods of Teaching Science. Dar al Shorouq for Publication and Distribution.
  • Zhao, G., & Pechman, C. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ response to antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 671687. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.4.671

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2191734

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_tner_23_71_1_14
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.