Quality Control Modelling of Competitive Professionals’ Training at Vocational Education Institutions

• Authors: Iryna Androshchuk , Larysa Sergeieva , Tetiana Stoychik , Liubov Kravchenko

Abstracts

EN

The most important condition that provides the opportunity for the professionalism of professionals is their competitiveness. The current task of institutions of professional (vocational technical) education (IP(VT)E) is to prepare a qualified and competitive specialist who not only has a certain level of knowledge, skills and abilities but can practically apply them in their professional activities. Future specialists’ training quality is based on the ability to adapt to rapidly changing production conditions. It is due both to the prospect of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union and to the internal situation in the country, where a large number of applicants in IP(VT)E and institutions of professional higher education (IPHE) do not always meet the requirements of the labour market. It requires resetting educational goals and objectives of vocational education, considering global changes in society, production, and technology. This article aims to substantiate the quality management model of training competitive specialists in IP(VT)E, considering the factors affecting the quality of training and contradictions that need to be resolved in the training process and experimental verification of its effectiveness. A set of theoretical and empirical methods was used to create a model and test its effectiveness, identifying the components that have become key in creating a model of quality management training for future competitive professionals in vocational education institutions. To determine the effectiveness, a set of questionnaires was developed, and within the framework of the pedagogical experiment, a section was conducted among entrants, applicants, graduates, pedagogical workers, heads of IP(VT)E regions of Ukraine, and employers, the results were analysed.

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 72
• Pages: 66-83

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Iryna Androshchuk

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University in Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/000000023557793X

author

Larysa Sergeieva

• University of Educational Management, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000271773014

author

Tetiana Stoychik

• Kryvyi Rih Professional Mining and Technology Lyceum, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000261069007

author

Liubov Kravchenko

• Communal Institution of Higher Education «Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education» of Dnipropetrovsk Region Council”, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000280312252

References

• Currie, C. T. (2018). Student Motivation Profiles as a Diagnostic Tool to Help Teachers Provide Targeted Support [PDXScholar]. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/4229
• Fried, E. I. (2020). Theories and Models: What They Are, What They Are for, and What They Are About. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2020.1854011
• Göhner, M., & Krell, M. (2021). Was ist schwierig am Modellieren? Identifikation und Beschreibung von Hindernissen in Modellierungsprozessen von Lehramtsstudierenden naturwissenschaftlicher Fächer. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-021-00131-4
• Halloun, I. A. (2018). Scientific Models and Modeling in the Framework of Systemic Cognition and Education.
• Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
• Parker, W. S. (2020). Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View. Philosophy of Science, 87(3), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/708691
• Reith, M., & Nehring, A. (2020). Scientific reasoning and views on the nature of scientific inquiry: testing a new framework to understand and model epistemic cognition in science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2716–2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1834168
• Rost, M., & Knuuttila, T. (2022). Models as Epistemic Artifacts for Scientific Reasoning in Science Education Research. Education Sciences, 12(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040276
• Sergeeva, L., & Stoychik, T. (2020). Managing the development of training of competitive professionals in vocational educational institutions. SHS Web of Conferences, 75, 02004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207502004
• Upmeier zu Belzen, A., Engelschalt, P., & Krüger, D. (2021). Modeling as Scientific Reasoning – The Role of Abductive Reasoning for Modeling Competence. Education Sciences, 11(9), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090495
• Vitvytska, S. S., Kolesnyk, N. Ye., Boichuk, I. D., Herasymchuk, O. L., Zaporozhtseva, Yu., S., Kovalchuk, O. A., & Usata, O. Yu. (2019). Modeliuvannia profesiinoi pidhotovky fakhivtsiv v umovakh yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv [Modeling professional training of specialists in the conditions of European integration processes]. Yevenok O. O.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.23.72.2.05

Biblioteka Nauki

2233948