2016 | 3 | 2 | 2-11
Article title

Feminist Rhetorical Praxis: Everyday Feminism as Public Agora

Title variants
Retoryka feminizmu: Everyday Feminism jako publiczna agora
Languages of publication
This essay examines the feminist rhetorical practices of the online digital media site Everyday Feminism. Focusing on the website’s social circulation (Royster and Kirsch 2012), we contend that Everyday Feminism functions as a public agora where webbed cyberfeminist rhetorical practices (Blair, Gajjala, and Tulley 2009) have a unique potential to reach public audiences and circulate in various social networks in order to potentially educate and empower others, foster conversations, and build alliances across lines of difference, time, and space.
W artykule analizie poddano feministyczne strategie retoryczne występujące na stronie internetowej Everyday Feminism. Skupiając się na społecznym obiegu witryny (Royster i Kirsch 2012), autorki twierdzą, że strona Everyday Feminism pełni funkcję publicznej agory, gdzie cyberfeministyczne praktyki retoryczne (Blair, Gajjala i Tulley 2009) mają wyjątkową możliwość dotarcia do masowego odbiorcy i zaistnienia w mediach społecznościowych, po to, by edukować, udzielać wsparcia, inicjować dialog i budować porozumienia na granicy różnic, czasu i przestrzeni.
Physical description
  • University of North Carolina
  • Illinois State University
  • Alcoff, Linda Martín. 1998. “What Should White People Do?” Hypatia 13(3): 6-26.
  • Banned By Everyday Feminism. “About.” Accessed March 30, 2016.
  • Berry, Wendell. 1989. The Hidden Wound. New York: North Point Press.
  • Blair, Kristine, Radhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. 2009. “Introduction - The Webs We Weave: Locating the Feminism in Cyberfeminism.” In Webbing Cyberfeminist Practice: Communities, Pedagogies, and Social Action, edited by Kristine Blair, Radkhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. 1-19. Creskill: Hampton Press.
  • Everyday Feminism. “About Everyday Feminism.” Accessed March 30, 2016.
  • Everyday Feminism.”Comments Policy.” Accessed March 30, 2016.
  • Everyday Feminism. “Facebook Page.” Accessed March 30, 2016.
  • Gerlitz, Carolin, and Anne Helmond. 2011. “The Like Economy: The Social Web in Transition.” Paper presented at MiT7 - Unstable Platforms: The Promise and Peril of Transition, MIT, Boston, MA:
  • McGerty, Lisa-Jane. 2000. “‘Nobody Lives Only in Cyberspace’: Gendered Subjectivities and Domestic Uses of the Internet.” CyberPsychology & Behaviour 3: 895-99.
  • Probyn, Ellspeth. 2000. “Shaming Theory, thinking dis-connections: Feminism and Reconciliation.” In Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism, edited by Sara Ahmed, Jane Kilby, Celia Lury, Maureen McNeil, and Beverley Skeggs. 48-60. New York: Routledge Press.
  • Queen, Mary. 2009. “Consuming the Stranger: Technologies of Rhetorical Action in Transnational Feminist Encounter.” In Webbing Cyberfeminist Practice: Communities, Pedagogies, and Social Action, edited by Kristine Blair, Radkhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. 263-86. Creskill: Hampton Press.
  • Ridolfo, Jim, and Dà nielle Nicole DeVoss. 2009. “Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13.2:
  • Royster, Jacqueline Jones, and Gesa E. Kirsch. 2012. Feminist Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition, and Literacy Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Ziarek Plonowska, Ewa. 2001. The Ethics of Dissensus: PostModernity, Feminism, and the Politics of Radical Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.