Prawdopodobieństwo w retoryce rzymskiej

• Authors: Hermann Marek

Title variants

EN

Probability in the Roman rhetoric

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

This article considers the question of probability in the Roman rhetoric. The modern scholars turn their attention fi rst of all to Greek probability. This essay try to show that also Roman orators were very interested in this persuasive instrument. The examination is based on Latin rhetorical treatises, Rhetorica ad Herennium, Cicero’s De inventione, Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria and on the texts of Rhetores Latini Minores. The article concludes by considering probability in the Roman rhetoric as a very impressive, even more credible than the truth, mean of persuasion.

Keywords

PL

retoryka; prawda; prawdopodobieństwo; perswazja

EN

rhetoric; truth; probability; persuasion

• Publisher: Polskie Towarzystwo Retoryczne
• Journal: Res Rhetorica
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 61-76

Dates

published

2014-11

Contributors

author

Hermann Marek

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński

References

• Achard G. (1989), Rhétorique à Herennius, texte établi et traduit, Paris: Les Belles Lettres
• Carey, C. (1994). Rhetorical Means of Persuasion w: I. Worthington (ed.) Greek Rhetoric in Action, London, New York: Routledge
• Clarke, M.L. (1968), Die Rhetorik bei den Römern (deutsche Ausgabe), Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
• Coenen, G. (2006) Rhetorisches Argumentieren im Licht antiker und moderner Theorien, BadenBaden: Deutscher Wissenschafts-Verlag
• Desbordes, F. (1996), La rhétorique antique, Paris: Hachette
• Dominik, J. (1997), Roman Eloquence. Rhetoric and Society and Literature, London, New York: Routledge
• Eisenhut, W. (1974), Einführung in die antike Rhetorik und ihre Geschichte, Darmstadt.
• Erickson, K.V. (1979). Plato: True and Sophistic Rhetoric, Amsterdam: Rodopi
• Gagarin, M. (1994), Probability and persuasion: Plato and early Greek rhetoric w: Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action, edited by I. Worthington, London, New York: Routledge
• Gaonkar, D.P. (2004), Contingency and Probability. In: A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, edited by W. Jost, W. Olmsted, Blackwell Publishing.
• Goebel, G.H. (1989). Probability in the Earliest Rhetorical Theory. “Mnemosyne” 12, s. 41-53.
• Helwig, A. (1973). Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht
• Kennedy, G. (1963). The Art of Persuasion in Greece, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
• Kennedy, G. (1972). The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
• Kennedy, G. (1980). Classical Rhetoric and its Christian Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina Press
• Kennedy, G. (1983), Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
• Korenjak, M. (2000). Publikum und Redner, ihre Interaktion in der sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit, München: C. H. Beck
• Lausberg, H. (1960). Rhetorisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, München: C. H. Beck
• Martin, J. (1974). Antike Rhetorik. Technik und Methode, München: C. H. Beck
• Morrow, G. (1979). Plato’s Conception of Persuasion. w: Erickson K. V. (ed.), Plato: True and Sphistic Rhetoric, Amsterdam: Rodopi
• Perelman, Ch. (1980). Das Reich der Rhetorik, München: C. H. Beck
• Vickers, B. (1999). In Defence of Rhetoric, Oxford: Clarendon Press
• Zantwijk van, T. (2009), Wahrscheinlichkeit, Warheit. w: Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, herausgegeben von G. Ueding, Darmstadt: Tübingen Max Niemeyer

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17380/rr.v1i1.11