Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 10 | 2 | 93-110

Article title

Welfare Considerations in Migration Decision-Making through a Life-Course Approach: A Qualitative Study of Spanish EU-Movers

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The welfare aspects of intra-European migration remain an important and controversial topic of academic and political debates. These discussions touch upon the classical ‘welfare magnet’ or ‘welfare tourism’ hypothesis. Transcending the politicised concept of ‘benefit tourism’, our paper examines how welfare-state considerations in relation to migration decisions vary across the life course. Relying on micro-level qualitative research focusing on Spanish intra-EU movers, the paper probes deeper into how individuals perceive welfare systems, analysing the subtle and nuanced meanings of different aspects of the welfare for their migration decisions. We focus more specifically on welfare provisions in terms of health care, compulsory education, child support and other care responsibilities, unemployment and pensions and retirement. Our research indicates that, in studies on the migration–welfare nexus, it is necessary to move beyond the current narrow focus on the welfare magnet hypothesis and to examine how diverse welfare arrangements continuously and dynamically set the context for migration decisions at various stages of an individual’s life. The results of our research show how features of the Spanish welfare system, in comparison to those of potential destination countries, might act as both a trigger and/or a barrier to migration. As such, we get a ‘thicker description’ of the role which welfare might play in shaping individuals’ eventual migratory aspirations and decisions.

Year

Volume

10

Issue

2

Pages

93-110

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

References

  • Andrejuk K. (2017). Self-Employed Migrants from EU Member States in Poland: Differentiated Professional Trajectories and Explanations of Entrepreneurial Success. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(4): 560–577.
  • Bade K. J. (2003). Europa en movimiento. Las migraciones desde finales del siglo XVIII hasta nuestros días. Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Barbulescu R. (2017). From International Migration to Freedom of Movement and Back? Southern Europeans Moving North in the Era of Retrenchment of Freedom of Movement Rights, in: J.-M. Lafleur, M. Stanek (eds), South-North Migration of EU Citizens in Times of Crisis, pp. 15–31. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Borjas G. J. (1999). Immigration and Welfare Magnets. Journal of Labor Economics 17(4): 607–637.
  • Brücker H., Epstein G. S., McCormick B., Saint-Paul G., Venturini A., Zimmermann K. F. (2002). Managing Migration in the European Welfare State, in: T. Boeri, G. Hanson, B. McCormick (eds), Immigration Policy and the Welfare State: A Report for the Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bruzelius C., Chase E., Seeleib-Kaiser M. (2016). Social Rights of EU Migrant Citizens: Britain and Germany Compared. Social Policy and Society 15(3): 403–416.
  • Busemeyer M. R., Goerres A., Weschle S. (2009). Attitudes towards Redistributive Spending in an Era of Demographic Ageing: The Rival Pressures from Age and Income in 14 OECD Countries. Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 195–212.
  • Bygnes S. (2015). Are They Leaving Because of the Crisis? The Sociological Significance of Anomie as a Motivation for Migration. Sociology 51(2): 258–273.
  • Castles S., de Haas H., Miller M. J. (2014). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • De Giorgi G., Pellizzari M. (2009). Welfare Migration in Europe. Labour Economics 16(4): 353–363.
  • De Haas H., Castles S., Miller M. J. (2020). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Macmillan.
  • De Jong P. W., de Valk H. A. G. (2020). Intra-European Migration Decisions and Welfare Systems: The Missing Life Course Link. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(9): 1773–1791.
  • Domingo A., Blanes A. (2015). Inmigración y emigración: estado de la cuestión y perspectivas de futuro, in: J. Arango, D. Moya Malapeira, O. A. Josep, E. Sánchez-Montijano (eds), Anuario de la inmigración en España 2014, pp. 94–122. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra SL.
  • Ehata R., Seeleib-Kaiser M. (2017). Benefit Tourism and EU Migrant Citizens: Real-World Experiences, in: J. Hudson, C. Needham, E. Heins (eds), Social Policy Review 29: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, pp. 181–198. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Fenger M. (2007). Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-Communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences 3(2): 1–30.
  • Geertz C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
  • Giulietti C. (2014). The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis and the Welfare Take-up of Migrants. IZA World of Labor. Online: https://wol.iza.org/articles/welfare-magnet-hypothesis-and-welfare-take-... (accessed: 10 December 2021).
  • González-Ferrer A. (2013). La nueva emigración española. Lo que sabemos y lo que no. Zoom Político 18. Online: https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/93167 (accessed: 10 December 2021).
  • Godin M. (2020). Far from a Burden: EU Migrants as Pioneers of a European Social Protection System from Below. International Migration 58(1): 136–150.
  • INE (2016). Estadistica de migraciones. Migraciones exteriores desde 2008. Flujo de emigracion con destino al extranjero (2008–2015). Online: https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htmt=24303&L=0
  • INE (2017). Estadística del Padrón continuo. Resultados detallados nacionales, por comunidades autónomas y provincias. Online: http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=125... (accessed: 10 December 2021).
  • Izquierdo M., Jimeno J. F., Lacuesta A. (2016). Spain: From Massive Immigration to Vast Emigration? IZA Journal of Migration 5, 10.
  • Jolivet D., Pereira S. (2021). The Dynamic Welfare Habitus and Its Impact on Brazilian Migration to Lisbon and Barcelona. Geoforum 120: 58-66.
  • Jorens Y., van Overmeiren F. (2009). General Principles of Coordination in Regulation 883/2004. European Journal of Social Security 11(1–2): 47–79.
  • Josifidis K., Supic N., Pucar E. B., Srdic S. (2014). Labour Migration Flows: EU8+2 vs EU-15. Journal of Business Economics and Management 15(1): 41–55.
  • Kahanec M., Zimmermann K. F. (2010). EU Labor Markets after Post-Enlargement Migration. Berlin: Springer.
  • Kulin J., Svallfors S. (2011). Class, Values, and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: A European Comparison. European Sociological Review 29(2): 155–167.
  • Kureková L. (2013). Welfare Systems as Emigration Factor: Evidence from the New Accession States. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51(4): 721–739.
  • Lafleur J.-M., Stanek M. (2017a). Restrictions on Access to Social Protection by New Southern European Migrants in Belgium, in: J.-M. Lafleur, M. Stanek (eds), South-North Migration of EU Citizens in Times of Crisis, pp. 99–121. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Lafleur J.-M., Stanek M. (eds) (2017b). South-North Migration of EU Citizens in Times of Crisis. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Martinsen D. S. (2005). Social Security Regulation in the EU: The De-Territorialization of Welfare? in: G. de Búrca (ed.), EU Law and the Welfare State: In Search of Solidarity, pp. 89–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moreno L. (2013). Crisis y reformas del bienestar en Europa. Presupuesto y Gasto Público 71: 29–41.
  • Moreno L., Sarasa S. (1992). The Spanish ‘via Media’ to the Development of the Welfare State. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados Working Paper 92–13. Online: https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/174811/3/Spanish_via_media.pdf (accessed: 10 December 2021).
  • OECD (2013). International Migration Outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Phillimore J., Bradby H., Knecht M., Padilla B., Brand T., Yi Cheung S., Pemberton S., Zeeb H. (2015). Understanding Healthcare Practices in Superdiverse Neighbourhoods and Developing the Concept of Welfare Bricolage: Protocol of a Cross-National Mixed-Methods Study. BMC International Health and Human Rights 15, 16.
  • Phillimore J., Bradby H., Brand T., Padilla B., Pemberton S. (2021). Exploring Welfare Bricolage in Europe’s Superdiverse Neighbourhoods. New York: Routledge.
  • Samers M., Collyer M. (2017). Migration. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
  • Schmidt C. M. (1994). The Country of Origin, Family Structure and Return Migration of Germany’s Guest-Workers. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 63(1–2): 119–125.
  • Svallfors S., Kulin J., Schnabel A. (2012). Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond, in: S. Stefan (ed.), Age, Class, and Attitudes Toward Government Responsibilities, pp. 158–192. Stanford University Press.
  • Valero-Matas J. A., Mediavilla J. J., Valero-Oteo I., Coca J. R. (2015). El pasado vuelve a marcar el presente: la emigración española. Papeles de Población 21(83): 41–74.
  • Van Mol C., de Valk H. A. G. (2016). Migration and Immigrants in Europe: A Historical and Demographic Perspective, in: B. Garcés-Mascareñas, R. Penninx (eds), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, pp. 31–55. Cham: Springer International.
  • Verschueren H. (2009). Regulation 883/2004 and Invalidity and Old-Age Pensions. European Journal of Social Security 11(1–2): 143–162.
  • Verschueren H. (2014). Free Movement or Benefit Tourism: The Unreasonable Burden of Brey. European Journal of Migration and Law 16(2): 147–179.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2049897

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17467_ceemr_2021_14
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.