A cultura chinesa: das dimensões culturais de Hofstede às perspectivas asiacêntricas de comunicação

• Authors: Manuel Duarte João Pires
• Languages of publication: PT

Abstracts

EN

At a time when China is assuming an increasingly influential role in world geostrategy, especially through economic and diplomatic power, there is still some ignorance about Chinese culture (Jullien, 2010). The aim of this article is to contribute to the understanding of the values of Chinese culture by reviewing the concepts of culture and communication in Chinese society based on the cultural dimensions advocated by Hofstede and on Miike’s “Asiacentric” perspectives. Based on the interpretation of these concepts, the present study argues that the development of communicative and intercultural competences is crucial not only to approach Chinese culture without generalizations or stereotyped insights but also for the benefit of dialogue between cultures and nations, so imperative these days.

ES

Numa época em que a China assume um papel cada vez mais influente na geoestratégia mundial, sobretudo através do poderio económico e diplomático, persiste ainda algum desconhecimento sobre a cultura chinesa (Jullien, 2010). O objetivo deste artigo é contribuir para a compreensão dos valores da cultura chinesa analisando os conceitos de cultura e de comunicação na sociedade chinesa à luz das dimensões culturais preconizadas por Hofstede e das perspectivas “asiacêntricas” defendidas por Miike. Com base na interpertação destes conceitos, o presente estudo defende que o desenvolvimento de competências comunicativas e interculturais se apresenta como um meio indispensável não só para conhecer a cultura chinesa sem uma abordagem apriorística ou estereotipada mas também para o sucesso do diálogo entre culturas e povos, tão premente nos dias que correm.

Keywords

EN

China; culture; communication; interaction; harmony

ES

China; cultura; comunicação; interação; harmonia

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Anuario Latinoamericano – Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 10

Dates

published

2020

online

2020-12-28

Contributors

author

Manuel Duarte João Pires

References

• Alsina, R. (1997). Elementos para una comunicación intercultural. Revista CIDOB D’Afers Internacionals, no. 36, pp. 11-21.
• Alsina, R. (2004). Cuestionamientos, características y miradas de la interculturalidad. Sphera Publica, no. 4, pp. 53-68.
• Byram, M., Gribkova, B. & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the Intercultural Dimension in Language Teaching: a practical introduction for teachers. Language Policy Division. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
• Chang, C. (2007). Asian Communication Tradition and Communicative Rationality: Rethinking Methods for Intercultural Studies. Intercultural Communication Studies XVI, no. 2, pp. 71-80.
• Chang, Y. Y. (2008). Cultural “Faces” of Interpersonal Communication in the U.S. and China. Intercultural Communication Studies XVII, no. 1, pp. 299-313.
• Chen, G. M. (2004). The two faces of Chinese communication. Human Communication, no. 7, pp. 25-36.
• Chen, G. M. & Starosta, W. J. (2003). Asian approaches to human communication: A dialogue. Intercultural Communication Studies, no. 12 (4), pp. 1-15.
• Cheng, J. (1994). Confucius as a Teacher. Philosophy of Confucius with Special Reference to its Educational Implications. (2nd ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Press.
• Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (2003). Indirectness, Inexplicitness and Vagueness Made Clearer. Pragmatics, no. 13 (3), pp. 381-400.
• Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
• Hall, S. (2006). A Identidade cultural da pós-modernidade. (11ª ed.). (T. T. Silva, & L. G. Louro, Trads.). Rio de Janeiro: DP&A Editora.
• Ho, D. (1976). On the Concept of Face. American Journal of Sociology, no. 81(4), pp. 867-884.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Hofstede, G. (2012). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. In: L. Samovar, R. E. Porter & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural Communication. (13th ed., pp. 19-33). Boston: Wadsworth.
• Hofstede Insights. (2018). Country: China. Recuperado a 12 de maio de 2019, de Hofstede Insights: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/china/
• Huang, L. (2000). The Chinese Way of Requesting Information in Intercultural Negotiation. Intercultural Communication Studies IX, no. 2, pp. 107-127.
• Jandt, F. (2015). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community. (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Jia, X. & Huang, F. (2008). A Contrastive Study of Requests in Chinese and American Cultures. Intercultural Communication Studies XVII, no. 2, pp. 299-313.
• Jullien, F. (29 de março de 2010). Entrevista Revista Cult. Mal-estar na Cultura. (Gunter Axt, Entrevistador). UFRGS, Brasil.
• Kang, L. (2014). Globalization and Cultural Trends in China. Honolulu University of Hawaii Press.
• Kulich, S. & Wang, Y. (2015). Intercultural Communication in China. In J. Bennett (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. (pp. 458-469). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• McSweeney, B. (2002). The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, no. 55 (11), pp. 1363-1372.
• Miike, Y. (2012). “Harmony without Uniformity”: an Asiacentric Worldview and its Communicative Implications. In L. Samovar, R. E. Porter & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural Communication. (13th ed., pp. 65-80). Boston: Wadsworth.
• Saint-Jacques, B. (2012). International Communication in a Globalized World. In L. Samovar, R. E. Porter & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural Communication. (13th ed., pp. 45-55). Boston: Wadsworth.
• Samovar, L., Porter, R. E. & McDaniel, E. R. (2012). Intercultural Communication. (13th ed). Boston: Wadsworth.
• Tannen, D. (1985). Cross-cultural Communication. In T. v. Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (vol. 4, pp. 203-215). London & Orlando: Academic Press.
• Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Triandis, H. (2001). Individualism-Collectivism and Personality. Journal of Personality, no. 69(6), pp. 907-924.
• Trigo, V. (2006). Cultura Económica Chinesa: Como Negociar na China? Lisboa: Edições Pedago.
• UNESCO. (2009). Investir na diversidade cultural e no diálogo intercultural. Relatório Mundial da UNESCO. (Resumo). Paris: UNESCO - Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura.
• Wang, J. (2008). A Cross-cultural Study of Daily Communication between Chinese and American - From the Perspective of High Context and Low Context. Asian Social Science, no. 4(10), pp. 151-154.
• Xiao, X. & Chen, G. M. (2009). Communication competence and moral competence: a Confucian perspective. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, no. 4(1), pp. 61-74.
• Yeh, R. (1988). On Hofstede’s Treatment of Chinese and Japanese Values. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, no. 6(1), pp. 149-160.
• Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zhang, D., Li, Y. & Wang, Y. (2013). How Culturally Appropriate is the Communicative Approach with Reference to the Chinese Context? Creative Education, no. 4(10a), pp. 1-5.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/al.2020.10.147-166