PL EN


2016 | 58 |
Article title

Floating Collections – an Alternative Concept in Library Collection Management

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The article is about an alternative concept in library collection management – floating collections – very popular in American public libraries nowadays. Selected literature is presented, the history of approach and a case study from Monterey County Free Libraries (MCFL) where the author of this article works. Potential benefits and challenges of floating collections are presented as well.
Year
Volume
58
Physical description
Dates
published
2016
online
2016-12-20
Contributors
References
  • Addleman J., Monterey County Free Libraries Strategic Plan 2013–2016, 2012 [online] http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/library/2013StrategicPlan.pdf [accessed: 15.11.2016].
  • Bartlett W. K., Floating Collections: a Collection Development Model for Long-term Success, Santa Barbara, C. A . 2014.
  • Canty A., Frolek L. C ., Thornley R., Andriats C., Bombak L., Lay C., Dell M., Floating collections at Edmonton Public Library, „Evidence Based Library & Information Practice” 2012, 7(1), pp. 65–69.
  • Cress A., The latest wave, “Library Journal” 2004, 129 (16), pp. 48–50.
  • Enis M., Industry: Decision Center Releases Floating Collection Module, “Library Journal” 2013, 138 (18), p. 21.
  • Glover C., Langstaff G., Floating collections within a consortium: Or, does it matter where the materials are shelved?, “PNLA Quarterly” 2006, 71 (1), pp. 12–13.
  • Hedlund O., Copeland A., Collection Management and the Budget Crunch: Are We Adequately Preparing Library Students for Current Practices?, “Collection Building” 2013, 32 (4), pp. 128–132 [online] https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/4586/
  • hedlund-2013-collection.pdf?sequence=1 [sccessed: 15.11.2016].
  • Johal J., Quigley T., Bartlett W., Kressler T., Gafiney J., Bartel C., Cropper D., Take the plunge! Implementing floating collections in your library system, “Public Libraries” 2012, 51 (3), pp. 13–20.
  • Report on Issues Regarding Possible Implementation of Floating Collections in the Contra Costa County Library, 2005 [online] http://ccclib.org/libinfo/Commission/Meetings/2005/May/doggedretrieversfinal.pdf [accessed 15.11.2016].
  • Rutherford N., To Float or Not To Float. Inside Nashville PL’s examination of the method’s performance, “Library Journal” 2016, 141 (6), pp. 46–48, [online] http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/04/collection-development/to-float-or-not-to-floatcollectionmanagement/#_[sccessed: 15.11.2016].
  • Weber K. E ., The Benefits and Drawbacks of Working with Floating Collections: The Perceptions of Public Librarians. A Master’s Paper for the M. S . in L. S . 2014, [online] https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:8dcb9639-47a0-4bb4-80c6-0e38e56b3ed0 [accessed: 15.11.2016].
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_fb_2016_58_119
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.