2018 | 52 | 6 |
Article title

Analiza porównawcza nadzoru nad projektem badawczym w zakresie osiągnięć studentów biznesu na uniwersytetach nigeryjskich

Title variants
Languages of publication
This study was designed to compare research project supervision on Student graduating performance in Kwara State University (KWASU) and University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) for two sessions. Emphasis was put on establishing the relationship between motivational factors, inhibiting factors, student writing and research capacity. The study employed the use of correlation design to establish the nature of relationships. The fidings revealed the existence of signifiant relationship between the above-mentioned elements and student time management in both universities.
Badanie miało na celu porównanie nadzoru nad projektem badawczym wśród studentów kończących studia w Kwara State University (KWASU) i University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) przez dwie sesje. Nacisk położono na ustalenie związku między czynnikami motywacyjnymi, czynnikami hamującymi, pracą uczniów i możliwościami badawczymi. W badaniu wykorzystano projekt korelacji do ustalenia charakteru relacji. Ujawniono istnienie istotnego związku między wyżej wymienionymi czynnikami a zarządzaniem czasem przez studentów na obu uniwersytetach.
Physical description
  • Ali, S., Zubair, H., Fahad, M., Hamid, K., Awais, A., Factors contributing to the students academic performance: A case study of Islamia University Sub-Campus, “American Journal of Educational Research” 2013, Vol. 1(8), pp. 283–289. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-8-3.
  • Ali, N., Jusoff, K., Ali, S., Mokhtar, N., Salamt, A., The factors inflencing students’ performance at Universiti Teknologi MARA Kedah, Malaysia, “Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures” 2009, Vol. 3(4), pp. 1–7.
  • Anderson, C., Day, K., MacLaughlin, P., Mastering the dissertation: Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes at master level dissertation supervision, “Studies in Higher Education” 2006, Vol. 31(2), pp. 20–31. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572017.
  • Bell, J., Doing Your Research Project, Open University Press, Buckingham 2000.
  • Cambridge University Reporter, Indicators of Academic Performance, 2003, [access: 8.08.2007].
  • Chabaya, O., Chiome, C., Chabaya, R.A., Students’ failure to submit research projects on time: A case study from Masvingo Regional Centre at Zimbabwe Open University, “Open Learning” 2009, vol. 24(3), pp. 211–221. DOI: 10.1080/02680510903201615.
  • Doreen, H.K, Scott, E.H., Impact of undergraduate research on academic performance, educational planning, and career development, “Journal of Natural Resource Life Science Education” 2006, vol. 35(1), pp. 194–201. DOI: 10.2134/jnrlse2006.0194.
  • Dundalk Institute of Technology. Project Supervision Guidelines for Staff and Students, Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, 2011, [access: 9.12.2013].
  • Frischer, J., Larsson, K., Laissez-faire in research education – an inquiry into a Swedish doctoral program, “High Education Policy” 2000, Vol. 13(2), pp. 132–155. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8733(99)00022-7.
  • Grant, B.M., Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fitions and fallacies, “International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education” 2005, Vol. 18(3), pp. 337–354. DOI: 10.1080/09518390500082483.
  • Herzberg, F., The motivation-hygiene concept and problems of manpower, “Personnel Administration” 1964, Vol. 27(1), pp. 3–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb02470.x/pdf.
  • Hunter, A.B., Laursen, S.L, Seymour, E., Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students cognitive, personal, and professional development, “Science Education” 2006, vol. 91(1), pp. 36–74. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20173.
  • Jeremy, C.B., Supervision Models and Theories. Small Business. Demand Media, 2014, [access: 9.11.2016].
  • Lee, A., How can a mentor support experimental learning?, “Journal of Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry” 2007, Vol. 12(13), pp. 333–340. DOI: 10.1177/1359104507078455.
  • Nyawaranda, v.A., Supervising research projects/dissertations, a paper delivered at the Zimbabwe Open University (ZOU) workshop, Mashonaland Central Region, Bindura 2005.
  • Narayana, R.K.v.S.S., Ph. D. Research Supervision: Some thoughts. A knoll. Delhi School of Economics, Delhi 2009.
  • Pearce, L., How to Examine a Thesis, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University, United Kingdom 2005.
  • Shumba, O., The social research workshops, quantitative educational research: Synopsis and reflctions on the scope of data analysis, 2004,
  • Punch, K.F., Introduction to Social Research Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches SAGE Publications, London 2004.
  • Sidhu, K.S., Methodology of Research in Education, Sterling, New Delhi 2001.
  • Tichaona, M., Onias, M., Challenges being experienced by undergraduate students in conducting research in open and distance learning, “International Journal of Asian Social Science” 2011, vol. 2(10), pp. 94–106.
  • Thondhlana, S., Mawere, D., Weda, Z., Factors affecting completion of research projects by students: a study of three Zimbabwe Open University regions, “Zimbabwe International Journal of Open & Distance Learning” 2011,Vol. 1(1), pp. 112–129.
  • Vergara, S.C., Gestão de Pessoas, Atlas, Sao Paulo 2000.
  • Wisker, G., The Good Supervisor, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2005.
  • Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (3 rd ed.), SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks 2003.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.