PL EN


2020 | 54 | 1 |
Article title

The Goals of Polish Family Firms

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This article investigates the differences in management goals between family owned and non-family owned firms in Poland. The aim is to understand whether there are general differences in between the two types of firms, along with differences in age, the internationalisation grade and the turnover of the firms. We used questionnaire-based interviews (computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) and computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) techniques) to create a sample of 758 Polish firms that employed more than 49 people. Using the substantial family influence index put forward by Klein (2010, p. 17), we identified 396 firms as being family firms, with the rest being non-family firms. Nine goals were presented to representatives of these firms (owners, chief executive officers (CEOs), chief financial officers (CFOs)) who were then asked to sort them into four groups. The estimation of the empirical data was conducted using descriptive analyses and statistical verifications of the differences in fraction indicators. According to the literature, we found that “independence from others” (control argument) is a significant difference in family firms, along with “long-term value creation” and “high growth rates”. Our focus was on Poland, a large, Eastern European country with only a brief history as a market economy. Its private sector is relatively small and there are fewer large and well-established family firms than there are in Western Europe. The practical impact of this study lies in a better understanding of Polish family firms for all stakeholders.
PL
This article investigates the differences in management goals between family owned and non-family owned firms in Poland. The aim is to understand whether there are general differences in between the two types of firms, along with differences in age, the internationalisation grade and the turnover of the firms. We used questionnaire-based interviews (computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) and computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) techniques) to create a sample of 758 Polish firms that employed more than 49 people. Using the substantial family influence index put forward by Klein (2010, p. 17), we identified 396 firms as being family firms, with the rest being non-family firms. Nine goals were presented to representatives of these firms (owners, chief executive officers (CEOs), chief financial officers (CFOs)) who were then asked to sort them into four groups. The estimation of the empirical data was conducted using descriptive analyses and statistical verifications of the differences in fraction indicators. According to the literature, we found that “independence from others” (control argument) is a significant difference in family firms, along with “long-term value creation” and “high growth rates”. Our focus was on Poland, a large, Eastern European country with only a brief history as a market economy. Its private sector is relatively small and there are fewer large and well-established family firms than there are in Western Europe. The practical impact of this study lies in a better understanding of Polish family firms for all stakeholders.
Year
Volume
54
Issue
1
Physical description
Dates
published
2020
online
2020-04-20
Contributors
References
  • Achleitner, A.-K., Bock, C., Braun, R., Schraml, S., & Welter, J. (2010). Zielstrukturen in Familienunternehmen: Empirische Hinweise auf die Beziehung zwischen Unternehmens- und Familienzielen. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 58(3), 227–258. doi:10.3790/zfke.58.3.227
  • Aldrich, H.E., & Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
  • Ampenberger, M., Schmid, T., Achleitner, A.-K., & Kaserer, C. (2013). Capital structure decisions in family firms: Empirical evidence from a bank-based economy. Review of Managerial Science, 7(3), 247–275.
  • Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A., & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2). doi:10.2139/ssrn.303864
  • Anderson, R.C., & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.
  • Andres, C. (2008). Large shareholders and fim performance – an empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 431–445. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfi.2008.05.003
  • Ang, J.S. (1992). On the theory of finance for privately held firms. Journal of Small Business Finance, 1(3), 185–203.
  • Astrachan, J.H., & Zellweger, T. (2008). Die Performance von Familienunternehmen: Literaturübersicht und Orientierungshilfe für künftige Forschungsarbeiten. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 56(1–2). doi:10.3790/zfke.56.1_2.83
  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C.C., & Gómez-Mejía, L.R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: A review and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. doi:10.1177/0894486511435355
  • Blanco-Mazagatos, V., Cuevedo-Puente, E., & Castrillo, L.A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 20(3), 199–213. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00095.x
  • Chrisman, J., Chua, J.H., & Litz, R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 467–472. doi:10.1016/S08839026(03)00055-7
  • Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2). doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x
  • Claver, E., Rienda, L., & Quer, D. (2007). Family firms’ risk perception: empirical evidence on the internationalisation process. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(3), 457–471. doi:10.1108/14626000810892283
  • Dick, M., & Pernsteiner, H. (2015). The impact of family influence on the financial sophistication of firms. European Journal of Management, 15(2). doi:10.18374/EJM-15-2.2
  • Dreux, D.R. (1990). Financing family business: alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review, 3(3). doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1990.00225.x
  • Dyer, W.G., & Whetten, D.A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6). doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
  • Ellul, A. (2009). Control Motivations and Capital Structure Decisions, Working Paper, Kelley School of Business, IN University, Bloomington.
  • Family Business Yearbook. (2014). Ernst & Young Global Limited.
  • Fernandez, Z., & Nieto, M.J. (2005). Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses: some influential factors. Family Business Review, 18(1). doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00031.x
  • Gallo, M.A., & Pont, C.G. (1996). Important factors in family business internationalization. Family Business Review, 9(1).
  • Gersick, K.E., Davis, J.A., Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to Generation Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Takács Haynes, K., Nuñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K.J.L., & Mojano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
  • Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21(2). doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00119.x
  • Habbershon, T.G., & Williams, M.L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1). doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x
  • Handler, W.C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3). doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00257.x
  • Hiebl, M.R.W. (2013). Risk aversion in family firms: what do we really know? Journal of Risk Finance, 14(1), 49–70.
  • James, H.S. (1999). Owner as manager. Extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41–55. doi:10.1080/13571519984304
  • Jaskiewicz, P., & Klein, S.B. (2007). The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1080–1089.
  • Jeżak, J. (2016). Rozwój przedsiębiorczości rodzinnej w Polsce na tle tendencji światowych. Przegląd Organizacji, 4.
  • Klein, S.B. (2000). Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure. Family Business Review, 13(3), 157–181.
  • Klein, S.B. (2008). Internationale Familienunternehmen – Definition und Selbstbild. In: C. Rödl, W. Schefflr, M. Winter (Hrsg.), Internationale Familienunternehmen. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.
  • Klein, S.B. (2010). Familienunternehmen. Lohmar–Köln: Verlag Eul.
  • Koładkiewicz, I. (2015). System nadzoru w firmie rodzinnej. Doświadczenia polskie i światowe. Warszawa: Poltext.
  • Märk, S., Kraus, S., & Peters, M. (2010). Der Einflss der Familie auf den Unternehmer: Eine qualitativempirische Untersuchung von Familienunternehmen auf Basis der Stewardship-Theorie. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 58(1). doi:10.3790/zfke.58.1.31
  • McConaughy, D.L., Matthews, C.H., & Fialko, A.S. (2001). Founding Family Controlled Firms: Performance, Risk and Value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 31–49. doi:10.1111/0447-2778.00004
  • Mishra, C.S., & McConaughy, D.L. (1999). Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4). doi:10.1177/104225879902300404
  • Olson, P.D., Zuiker, V.S., Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., Heck, R.K.Z., & Duncan, K.A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 639–666. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00014-4
  • Pernsteiner, H., & Dick, M. (2013). The capital structure and the dividend policy of family firms. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, 47(4).
  • Pernsteiner, H., & Węcławski, J. (2016). How do Polish non-listed family firms engage in strong relationship banking? In: M. Asal (ed.), Contemporary Problems in Corporate Governance. Rapport Högskolan Väst, No. 3. Sweden.
  • Shanker, M.C., Astrachan, J.H. (1996). Myths and realities. Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy – a framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.
  • Sharma, P. (2004). An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies. Current Status and Directions for the Future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x
  • Simon, F.B. (2012). Einführung in die Theorie des Familienunternehmens. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag.
  • Ward, J.L. (1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, 10(4), 323–337. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00323.x
  • Zahra, S.A. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00057-0
  • Zellweger, T.M., & Astrachan, J.H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21(4). doi:10.1177/08944865080210040106
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_h_2020_54_1_89-100
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.