From Scientist to Broker, and How Brokers Use Their Social Capital to Develop Talents at Universities

• Authors: Marzena Staszkiewicz , Katarzyna Klimkiewicz

Abstracts

EN

The social capital of an organization is one of the key success factors of enterprises that build their competitive position in the market. This resource, obtained from social structures, can also be used to achieve goals set for public sector organizations, such as universities. Universities operate in conditions of high uncertainty, changing roles, and expectations of stakeholders, which requires adaptability and flexibility of operation. In addition to improving the quality of research and teaching, one of the important evaluation criteria is also the ability to transfer knowledge to the economy and commercialization of research. One of the activities undertaken by universities to support employees in ongoing changes is the implementation of academic scouting, introducing departmental innovation brokers who play the role of coaches/mentors, supporting research and teaching staff by commercializing their research results. The aim of the article is to show how the social capital of departmental innovation brokers supports the development of competences of scientific and research scholars. Based on the conducted qualitative research, it was presented how brokers use their social capital to achieve multidimensional goals in relation to other people, as well as organizational goals resulting from the entrusted function. Factors hindering the cooperation of departmental innovation brokers with academics, which are manifested in various areas of social capital – structural, cognitive, and relational – were analyzed.

Keywords

EN

social capital; competence development; knowledge transfer; coaching; mentoring

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 55
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 107-123

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Marzena Staszkiewicz

• AGH University of Science and Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000332499945

author

Katarzyna Klimkiewicz

• AGH University of Science and Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000329278308

References

• Alexander, A., Martin, D.P., Manolchev, C. & Miller, K. (2020). University – industry collaboration: using meta-rules to overcome barriers to knowledge transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45. doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9685-1
• Allen, T.J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Andrews, R. (2010). Organizational Social Capital, Structure and Performance. Human Relations, 63(5). doi:10.1177/0018726709342931.
• Boyer, C.M., & Lewis, D.R. (1984). Faculty consulting: Responsibility or Promiscuity? Journal of Higher Education, 55(5). doi:10.1080/00221546.1984.11780684
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2). doi:10.1080/10438590600982830
• Buick, F. (2014). Boundary spanning to address Indigenous disadvantage in Australia. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 143-159). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203488058.
• Buick, F., O’Flynn, J., & Malbon, E. (2019). Boundary Challenges and the Work of Boundary Spanners. In H. Dickinson, C. Needham, C. Mangan & H. Sullivan (Eds.), Reimagining the Future Public Service Workforce. SpringerBriefs in Political Science (pp. 21-38). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1480-3_2.
• Burt, R.S. (2002). The Social Capital of Structural Holes. In M.F. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.), The New Economic Sociology (pp. 148–192). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2). doi:10.1086/421787.
• Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
• Cunningham, J., Mentor, M. & O’Kane C. (2018). Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, 48(1). doi: 10.1111/radm.12310.
• Czakon, W. (2014). Zarządzanie kapitałem społecznym organizacji – aspekty strukturalne. In A. Sankowska & K. Santarek (red.), Społeczne aspekty zarządzania. Wybrane problemy (pp. 9–22). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Warszawskiej.
• Czarkowska, L.D. (2012). Coaching jako wskaźnik zmian paradygmatów w zarządzaniu, Warszawa: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego.
• Czekierda P. (2015). Czym jest tutoring. In P. Czekierda, B. Fingas & M. Szala (red.), Tutoring. Teoria, praktyka, studia przypadków (pp. 15-36). Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Warszawa.
• Dembkowski, S., Eldridge, F., & Hunter I. (2006). The Seven Steps of effective executive coaching. London: Thorogood.
• Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2). doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0242.
• Gibbons, M., & Johnston, R. (1974). The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy, 3(3). doi:10.1016/0048-7333(74)90008-0.
• Gibbons, M. (2000). Changing patterns of university–industry relations. Minerva, 38(3).
• Gwarda-Gruszczyńska, E., & Czapla, T. (2011). Kluczowe kompetencje menedżera ds. komercjalizacji. Warszawa: PARP.
• Hargrove, R. (2006). Mistrzowski coaching. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Kraków.
• Inkpen, A., & Tsang, E. (2005). Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159100
• Juchnowicz, M. (2014). Zarządzanie kapitałem ludzkim. Procesy – narzędzia – aplikacje. Warszawa: PWE.
• Kardas, M. (2018). Formy współpracy uczelni w modelu otwartej innowacji. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 3(182).
• Kauffeld-Monz, M., & Fritsch, M. (2013). Who are knowledge brokers in regional systems of innovation? A multi-actor network analysis. Regional Studies, 47(5). doi.10.1080/00343401003713365
• Klimkiewicz, K., Kowalik, W., Staszkiewicz, M., Konopka-Cupiał, G., & Beck-Krala, E. (2019). Raport określający modelowy profil kompetencyjny personelu odpowiedzialnego za kreowanie i realizację polityki badań i innowacji w środowisku akademickim. Kraków: Inno AGH, unpublished work.
• Klimkiewicz, K. i Staszkiewicz, M. (2020). Projektowanie narzędzi oceny kompetencji dla stanowisk związanych z komercjalizacją wiedzy i transferem technologii. In M. Stor & A. Domaradzka (Eds.), Zarządzanie kapitałem ludzkim 4.0 - wyzwanie organizacyjne i kompetencyjne w perspektywie menedżerskiej (pp. 66-74). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
• Klimkiewicz, K., Szmal, A., Staszkiewicz, M., Kowalik, W. & Kowal, D. (2021, forthcoming). Analysis and Development of Competencies of Faculty Innovation Brokers. Exemplary Methods of Evaluation and Measurement. In A. Duda (Ed.), Interorganizational Cooperation: Towards Efficient Konwledge Sharing between Business and Science. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
• Kobylińska, U. (2020). The Relational Context of Academic Entrepreneurship. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 6(137). doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.5842
• Leana, C., & Van Burren, H. (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3). doi:10.2307/259141
• Leja, K. (2003). Instytucja akademicka. Strategia, efektywność, jakość. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe.
• Lowe, R., & Gonzalez-Brambila, C. (2007). Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3). doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9014-y.
• Marzec, I. (2020). The Intra–Organizational Professional Network as a Factor in Enhancing Employee Job Satisfaction and Performance in Public Organizations. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 5(136).
• Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D Management, 48(1). doi:10.1111/radm.12228
• Morrison, A. (2008). Gatekeepers of Knowledge within industrial districts: who they are, how they interact. Regional Studies, 42(6). doi:10.1080/00343400701654178
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
• Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. (2011). Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40(4). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007
• Rossi, F., & Rosli, A. (2014). Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10). doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914914.
• Sidor-Rządkowska, M. (2012). Profesjonalny coaching. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer business.
• Sidor-Rządkowska, M. (2014). Pojęcie i istota mentoringu. In M. Sidor-Rządkowska (red.), Mentoring. Teoria, praktyka, studia przypadków (pp. 15-56). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer SA.
• Sitko-Lutek, A. (2013). Kompetencje menedżerskie w kontekście innowacyjności przedsiębiorstw. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia, 47(1), 141-149.
• Skrzypek, E. (2014). Pomiar kapitału intelektualnego w przedsiębiorstwie – aspekty metodyczne. Studia Metodologiczne, 32, 95–116.
• Smółka, P. (2009). Coaching. Inspiracje z perspektywy nauki, praktyki i klientów. Gliwice: HELION.
• Sobotka, B. (2020). In Search of Desired Competences on the
• Threshold of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 5(136). doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.4447.
• Starr, J. (2011). Podręcznik coachingu. Sprawdzone techniki treningu personalnego. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer.
• Trzmielak, D. (2013). Komercjalizacja wiedzy i technologii – determinanty i strategie. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Tushman, M.L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4). doi:10.2307/2392402.
• Williams, P. (2013). We are all boundary spanners now? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1). doi:10.1108/09513551311293417.
• Wiśniewska, M., Głodek, P., & Trzmielak, D. (2015). Wdrażanie scoutingu wiedzy w polskiej uczelni wyższej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Wnuk, M. (2020). Trust in the Supervisor as a Mediator between Perceived Supervisor Support and Attitude Toward the Organization. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 6 (137). doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.5838.
• Złoty, M. (2018). Factors Influencing the Innovativeness of the Global Economy in the 21st Century. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia, 52(4). doi:10.17951/h.2018.52.4.143-151.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/h.2021.55.2.107-123

Biblioteka Nauki

2166150