WIG-20 Warsaw Stock Exchange Companies: Are They Ready for Governance Matters Disclosures Based on EU Sustainable Reporting Standards?

• Authors: Joanna Próchniak , Renata Płoska

Abstracts

EN

Theoretical background: In 2022, the European Commission’s intensive efforts to revise and enhance the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) from 2014 resulted in the proposal of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the exposure draft on ESRS EDs (EFRAG Sustainable Reporting Standards Exposure Drafts). The ESRS drafts for public consultation presented the mandatory concepts and principles for sustainability reporting under the CSRD. The implementation of corporate sustainability is closely related to reporting that stimulates robustness of companies’ commitment to sustainability, and sustainable long-term actions taken by companies. Environment is priority, however, having in mind sophisticated environmental performance indicators, it is governance that ensures stakeholders whether the company exercises the sustainable obligations effectively. Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article is to determine EFRAG draft standards compliance with the Warsaw Stock Exchange best practices and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, and an assessment of WIG-20 reporting practices regarding EFRAG draft standards. The main research question was whether and to what extent WIG-20 companies meet the sustainable reporting exposure drafts on governance matters proposed by EFRAG. Research methods: The study method was desk-based research using the gathered corporate data. The assumptions on the importance of governance matters were supported by VOSviewer analysis of Scopus bibliometric database analysis. Main findings: The results of the study have shown that the scope and level of reported disclosures by WIG-20 companies – that are best performing and positive toward sustainability – is insufficient and reporting practices do not meet proposed EFRAG draft standards. The study contributes to scarce research addressing the sustainability reporting approach. It provides a study of the governance maters regarding draft governance reporting ESRS drafts.

Keywords

EN

corporate governance; ESG reporting; reporting standards; corporate social responsibility

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 56
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 227-246

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Joanna Próchniak

• University of Gdańsk. Faculty of Management

• https://orcid.org/0000000310963196

author

Renata Płoska

• University of Gdańsk. Faculty of Management

• https://orcid.org/0000000217164496

References

• Adams, C.A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility, and the audit expectations gap. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97-115.
• Aluchna, M., Kytsyuk, I., & Roszkowska-Menkes, M. (2018). Raportowanie społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu. Przypadek spółek WIG20. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów. Zeszyt Naukowy, 170, 9-27.
• Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448. doi:10.1108/00251740810863870
• Ayuso, S., Rodríguez, M.A., García-Castro, R., & Ariño, M.A. (2014). Maximizing stakeholders' interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Business & Society, 53(3), 414-439. doi:10.1177/0007650311433122
• Best Practice. (2021). Best Practice for GPW listed companies 2021. WSE.
• Błażyńska, J. (2020). Raportowanie ładu korporacyjnego zgodnie z SIN na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Zeszyty Naukowe. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, 3(987), 87-105. doi:10.15678/ZNUEK.2020.0987.0305
• Borga, F., Citterio, A., Noci, G., & Pizzurno, E. (2009). Sustainability report in small enterprises: Case studies in Italian furniture companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 162-176. doi:10.1002/bse.561
• Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Van Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., & Christiaens, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture? Accounting Forum, 35(3), 187-204. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.007
• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. In M. Wright (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Governance (pp. 719-743). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Brown, J.A., & Forster, W.R. (2013). CSR and stakeholder theory: A tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 301-312. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1251-4
• Brown, L., & Caylor, M.L. (2009). Corporate governance and firm operating performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 129-144. doi:10.1007/s11156-007-0082-3
• Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 511-534. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z
• Cavaco, S., Crifo, P., & Guidoux, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and governance: The role of executive compensation. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 59(2), 240-274. doi:10.1111/irel.12254
• Crifo, P., & Rebérioux, A. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A typology of OECD countries. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 5(2), 14-27. doi:10.22495/jgr_v5_i2_p2
• Cullinan, C.P., Mahoney, L., & Roush, P.B. (2019). Directors & corporate social responsibility: Joint consideration of director gender and the director's role. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 39(2), 100-123. doi:10.1080/0969160X.2019.1586556
• de la Cuesta, M., & Valor, C. (2013). Evaluation of the environmental, social and governance information disclosed by Spanish listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 220-240. doi:10.1108/SRJ-08-2011-0065
• Delbard, O. (2008). CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: an analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 397-405. doi:10.1108/14720700810899149
• Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, L 330/1. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/ PDF/?uri=CELEx:32014L0095&from=EN
• Dmytriyev, S.D., Freeman, R.E., & Hörisch, J. (2021). The relationship between stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility: Differences, similarities, and implications for social issues in management. Journal of Management Studies, 58(6), 1441-1470. doi:10.1111/joms.12684
• Draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards. (2022, April). Cover note for public consultation. EFRAG.
• Dwekat, A., Seguí-Mas, E., Tormo-Carbó, G., & Carmona, P. (2020). Corporate governance configurations and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Qualitative comparative analysis of audit committee and board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2879-2892. doi:10.1002/csr.2009
• Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 88-108. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
• El Gammal, W., y assine, N., Fakih, K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2020). The relationship between CSR and corporate governance moderated by performance and board of directors' characteristics. Journal of Management and Governance, 24, 411-430. doi:10.1007/s10997-018-9417-9
• ESRS 1 General principles. (2022, April). Exposure Draft. EFRAG.
• ESRS 2 General, strategy, governance, and materiality assessment. (2022, April). Exposure Draft. EFRAG.
• ESRS G1 Governance, risk management and internal control. (2022, April). Exposure Draft. EFRAG.
• ESRS G2 Business conduct. (2022, April). Exposure Draft. EFRAG.
• ESRS: Governance architecture Issues Paper. (2022, August). EFRAG SR TEG meeting, Paper 04-01, EFRAG Secretariat.
• European Commission. (2017). Communication from the Commission: Guidelines on non-financial reporting (methodology for reporting non-financial information), 2017/C 215/01. Retrieved from https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TxT/PDF/?uri=CELEx:52017xC0705(01)&from=EN
• European Commission. (2019a). Communication from the Commission: Guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information, 2019/C 209/01. Retrieved from https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/PDF/?uri=CELEx:52019xC0620(01)
• European Commission. (2019b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The European Green Deal, COM (2019) 640 final. Retrieved from https://ec.europa. eu/info/sites/default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
• Flammer, C., Hong, B., & Minor, D. (2019). Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 1097-1122. doi:10.1002/smj.3018
• Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Pucheta-Martínez, M.C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility reporting and corporate governance mechanisms: An international outlook from emerging countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 3(1), 77-97. doi:10.1002/bsd2.80
• García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2020). Drivers of the CSR report assurance quality: Credibility and consistency for stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2530-2547. doi:10.1002/csr.1974
• Gjerdrum Pedersen, E.R., Neergaard, P., Thusgaard Pedersen, J., & Gwozdz, W. (2013). Conformance and deviance: Company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(6), 357-373. doi:10.1002/bse.1743
• Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). Consolidated Set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards.
• Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). Consolidated Set of GRI Standards.
• Grzesiak, L. (2021). An internal audit expectation gap in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H - Oeconomia, 55(3), 37-50.
• Harjoto, M.A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR Nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45-67. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6
• Hawrysz, L. (2017). Przygotowanie spółek giełdowych do ujawniania informacji pozafinansowych. In A. Płachciak & P. Rogala (Eds.), Biznes i środowisko - wybrane problemy (pp. 40-51). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu Nr 470.
• Hong, B., Li, Z., & Minor, D. (2016). Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 199-213. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2962-0
• Horváth, P., Pütter, J.M., Haldma, T., Lääts, K., Dimante, D., … & Labaš, D. (2017). Sustainability reporting in Central and Eastern European companies: Results of an international and empirical study. In P. Horváth, & J.M. Pütter (Eds.), Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies. MIR Series in International Business. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52578-5
• ICGN Global Governance Principles. (2021). International Corporate Governance Network.
• Integrated Reporting. (2021). International Framework. Retrieved from https://www.integratedreporting.org/ir-businessnetwork/
• ISO 26000:2010, Guidance on social responsibility. (2010). International Organization for Standarization.
• Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253-273. doi:10.1111/corg.12154
• Jamali, D., Safieddine, A.M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance, 16(5), 443-459. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x
• Jastrzębska, E. (2021). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w Polsce w czasie pandemii COVID-19 a cele zrównoważonego rozwoju ONZ. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H - Oeconomia, 55(3), 51-65.
• Jerzemowska, M., Golec, A., & Zamojska, A. (2015). Corporate governance: BRIC i Polska na tle krajów rozwiniętych. Gdańsk: Wyd. UG.
• Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1-15. doi:10.1002/bse.511
• Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15-26. doi:10.1002/csr.196
• KPMG. (2020a). ESG: Environmental, Social, Governance. An introductory guide for businesses. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/uk/pdf/2020/08/esg-brochure.pdf
• KPMG. (2020b). The time has come. The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf
• Krzysztofek, A. (2020). Odpowiedzialność w nadzorze korporacyjnym spółek z Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Kielce: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jana Kochanowskiego.
• Laskowska, A., & Lingo, M. (2018). Ocena raportowania społecznego banków w Polsce. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H -Oeconomia, 52(1), 119-128.
• Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). The credibility of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 186-200. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.060
• Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2017). Measuring credibility perceptions in CSR communication: Ascale development to test readers' perceived credibility of CSR reports. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 584-613. doi:10.1177/0893318917707592
• Marcinkowska, M. (2014). Corporate governance w bankach. Teoria i praktyka. Łódź: Wyd. UŁ.
• Mason, Ch., & Simmons, J. (2014). Embedding corporate social responsibility in corporate governance: A stakeholder systems approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 77-86. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9
• Mazurowska, M., & Płoska, R. (2022). Sprawozdawcza i pozasprawozdawcza komunikacja w zakresie społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu. Centrum Myśli Strategicznych. Retrieved from https://fundacjacms.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Sprawozdawcza-i-pozasprawozdawcza-komunikacja-zewn%C4%99trzna-wersja-elektroniczna.pdf
• Mazzotta, R., Bronzetti, G., & Veltri, S. (2020). Are mandatory non-financial disclosures credible? Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1900-1913. doi:10.1002/csr.1935
• Ministerstwo Rozwoju. (2017). Raportowanie niefinansowe. Poradnik dla raportujących . Retrieved from https://www.gov.pl/web/fundusze-regiony/raportowanie-spoleczne
• Miras-Rodríguez, M., & Di Pietra, R. (2018). Corporate governance mechanisms as drivers that enhance the credibility and usefulness of CSR disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 22, 565-588. doi:10.1007/s10997-018-9411-2
• Munilla, L.S., & Miles, M.P. (2005). The corporate social responsibility continuum as a component of stakeholder theory. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 371-387. doi:10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00021.x
• Odriozola, M.D., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2017). Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 121-132. doi:10.1002/csr.1399
• Oh, W.-Y., Chang, Y.K., & Kim, T.-Y. (2018). Complementary or substitutive effects? Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2716-2739. doi:10.1177/0149206316653804
• Outreach Financial Institutions. (2022, June). European sustainability reporting standards. EFRAG presentation.
• Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals' accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 173-190. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5
• Pirson, M., & Turnbull, S. (2018). Decentralized governance structures are able to handle CSR-induced complexity better. Business & Society, 57(5), 929-961. doi:10.1177/0007650316634039
• Płoska, R. (2009). Raport społeczny jako instrument budowania zaufania w relacjach z interesariuszami. Prace i Materiały Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 7(3/2), 191-200.
• Pokojski, Z. (2021). Model biznesowy - kontekst innowacji. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H - Oeconomia, 55(3), 81-100.
• Qu, W., Leung, P., & Cooper, B. (2013). A study of voluntary disclosure of listed Chinese firms - a stakeholder perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(3), 261-294. doi:10.1108/02686901311304376
• Rubik, J. (2018). Raportowanie nienfiansowe spółek RESPECT INDEX po zmianach. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 369, 209-220.
• Sahut, J.-M., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Teulon, F. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 901-912. doi:10.1007/s10997-019-09472-2
• Shahin, A., & Zairi, M. (2007). Corporate governance as a critical element for driving excellence in corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(7), 753-770. doi:10.1108/02656710710774719
• Shrivastavaa, P., & Addas, A. (2014). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4(1), 21-37. doi:10.1080/20430795.2014.887346
• Sroka, R. (2013). Raportowanie społeczne na świecie. In N. Ćwiek (Ed.), Wspólna odpowiedzialność - rola raportowania społecznego (pp. 7-22). Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu.
• Sroka, R. (Ed.) (2017). Analiza ESG spółek w Polsce: Raportowanie niefinansowe: wymagania ustawy o rachunkowości a praktyka rynkowa. Stowarzyszenie Emitentów Giełdowych, GES, Ey . Retrieved from https://seg.org.pl/storage/uploads/Materia%C5%82y%20do%20pobrania/1625060080_seg_esg-2017_210x297_www-6_1.pdf
• Stuebs, M., & Sun, L. (2010). Corporate governance and environmental performance. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 11(3), 381-395. doi:10.1108/S1479-359820140000005012
• Szadziewska, A., Majchrzak, I., Remlein, M., & Szychta, A. (2021). Rachunkowość zarządcza a zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstwa. Katowice: IUS PUBLICUM.
• Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, Financial Stability Board - Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/60/2021/10/FINAL2017-TCFD-Report.pdf
• Tibiletti, V., Marchini, P.L., Furlotti, K., & Medioli, A. (2021). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 896-907. doi:10.1002/csr.2097
• Warsaw Stock Exchange & European Bank of Reconstruction and Development. (2021). ESG Reporting Guidelines. Guide for issuers. Retrieved from https://www.gpw.pl/pub/GPW/ESG/ESG_Reporting_Guidelines.pdf
• Weber, O. (2014). Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(5), 303-317. doi:10.1002/bse.1785
• Welford, R. (2007). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Issues for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(1), 42-51. doi:10.1002/csr.139
• Young, S., & Thyil, V. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Role of context in international settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 1-24. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1745-8
• Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Jamali, D. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), 690-752. doi:10.1177/0007650320973415

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/h.2022.56.5.227-246

Biblioteka Nauki

18105044