Mega-Regionalism in Trade from a Sectoral Perspective. The Case of the Automotive Industry in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership

• Authors: Sebastian Bobowski , Bogusława Drelich-Skulska

Abstracts

EN

Theoretical background: The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is the largest mega-regional trade agreement ever signed, accounting for more than 30% of the global population, exports, and gross domestic product (GDP). It is also the largest automotive market worldwide, with significant potential both in terms of automotive manufacturing and sales. Purpose of the article: The paper’s main objective is to characterize China-RCEP automotive trade in the years 2012–2021 with reference to key provisions and implications of the aforementioned mega-regional trade agreement for the automotive industry. In the empirical part of the paper, the authors attempt to verify the hypothesis that trade liberalization under RCEP may contribute to the expansion of the regional automotive industry in terms of trade volume, as well as fragmentation of value and supply chains. Research methods: The authors conducted an analysis of intra-industry trade disaggregated into 54 six-digit HS tariff codes using the Grubel–Lloyd and Balassa indexes, accompanied by cross sectional analysis and studies of sectoral reports and literature in the field of mega-regionalism in trade. Main findings: The hypothesis formulated in the introduction of the paper was verified positively –the authors provided an added value to previous empirical studies on RCEP, in the form of a perspective of the automotive industry and in-depth analysis of sectoral trends for the last ten years. The potential for further fragmentation of value and supply chains inside the region was identified, including the possibility of relocation of manufacturing and assembly activities to lower the cost of RCEP Member States to strengthen comparative advantages over extra-regional counterparts (EU, USMCA). The authors pointed at the prospective rising attractiveness of RCEP in automotive manufacturers’ location decisions worldwide, considering both costs, retreat from global-oriented manufacturing and export strategies, investment security, sustainable development, as well as geopolitical trends in respect of newly established tariff and non-tariff barriers.

Keywords

EN

automotive industry; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP); COVID-19 pandemic crisis; mega-regionalism in trade; intra-industry trade

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 57
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 61-85

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Sebastian Bobowski

• Wrocław University of Economics and Business. Department of International Business

• https://orcid.org/000000021723313X

author

Bogusława Drelich-Skulska

• Wrocław University of Economics and Business. Department of International Business

• https://orcid.org/0000000302331850

References

• Abd-el-Rahman, K. (1984). Firms' competitive and national comparative advantage as joint determinants of trade composition. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(1), 83-97.
• Anderer, Ch., Dür, A., & Lechner, L. (2020). Trade policy in a “GVC world”: Multinational corporations and trade liberalization. Business and Politics, 22(4), 639-666. doi:10.1017/bap.2020.4
• Araujo, B.M. (2018). Labour provisions in EU and US mega-regional trade agreements: Rhetoric and reality. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 67(1), 233-253. doi:10.1017/S0020589317000422
• Aturupane, Ch., Djankov, S., & Hoeckman, B. (1999). Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade between Eastern Europe and the European Union. Weltwirtschftliches Archiv, 135(1), 62-81. doi:10.1007/ BF02708159
• Baccini, L., & Dür, A. (2018). Global value chains and product differentiation: Changing the politics of trade. Global Policy, 9(2), 49-97. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12614
• Baccini, L., Dür, A., & Elsig, M. (2018). Intra-industry trade, global value chains, and preferential tariff liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 62(2), 329-340. doi:10.1093/isq/sqy006
• Bagchi, S., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2019). Country-specific determinants of intra-industry trade in India. Foreign Trade Review, 54(3), 129-158. doi:10.1177/00157325198516
• Basu Das, S. (2014). The political economy of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreements: An ASEAN Perspective . Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
• Bhagwati, J.N. (2008). Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bhaskaran, M. (2020). Economic overview of Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 19-42.
• Bobowski, S. (2018a). Measurement of intra-industry trade in international production networks in the HDD industry. The case of East Asia. Transformations in Business & Economics, 17(2A(44A)), 390-409.
• Bobowski, S. (2018b). Trade Regionalism of Tomorrow. Entanglement of Mega-Regionals Vs. WTO. Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Bown, Ch.P. (2017). Mega-regional trade agreements and the future of the WTO. Global Policy, 8(1),107-112. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.12391
• De Beer, J. (2018). The rise of mega-regionalism: Revealing Canada's blind spots. Policy Brief, 140. Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/PB%20no.140.pdf
• Drelich-Skulska, B., & Bobowski, S. (2021). Intra-industry trade and implications of the European UnionJapan economic partnership agreement from the perspective of the automotive industry. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(2), 183-206. doi:10.15678/EBER.2021.090212
• European Customs Portal. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.tariffnumber.com/2022/851829
• Flach, L., Hildenbrand, H., & Teti, F. (2021). The regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement and its expected effects on world trade. Intereconomics, 56(2), 92-98. doi:10.1007/s10272-021-0960-2
• Fontagné L., & Freudenberg, M. (1997). Intra-industry trade: Methodological issues reconsidered. CEPII Working Paper, 1.
• Greenaway, D., Hine, R., & Milner, C. (1994). Country-specific factors and the pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130(1), 77-100. doi:10.1007/BF02706010
• Grubel, H.G., & Lloyd, P.J. (1971). The empirical measurement of intra-industry trade. Economic Record, 47(4), 494-517. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.1971.tb00772.x
• Hamanaka, S. (2014). TPP versus RCEP: Control of membership and agenda setting. Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 18(2), 163-186.
• Hamilton, D.S. (2014). America's mega-regional trade diplomacy: Comparing TPP and TTIP. The International Spectator, 49(1), 81-97. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GAC/2014/WEF_GAC_TradeFDI_MegaRegionalTradeAgreements_Report_2014.pdf. doi:10.1080/03932729.2014.877223
• Hua, T. (2021). A look at the RCEP from a customs perspective. WCO News, 96. Retrieved from https:// mag.wcoomd.org/magazine/wco-news-96/rcep-from-a-customs-perspective/
• Huber-Straßer, A. (2021). Reorganisation of the automobile market. KPMG Blog, 8 April. Retrieved from https://kpmg.com/de/en/blogs/home/posts/2021/04/reorganisation-of-the-automobile-market.html
• IMF. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/APAC/Issues/2022/10/13/regional-economic-outlook-for-asia-and-pacific-october-2022
• Ji, X. (2021). Mega-Regionalism and Great Power Geo-Economic Competition. New York: Routledge.
• Ji, X., Rana, P.B., Chia, W.M., & Li, C.T. (2018). Trade policy options for ASEAN countries and their regional dialogue partners: Preference ordering using CGE analysis. RSIS Working Paper, 308, 1-30 NTU. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88330
• Jošić, H., & Žmuk, B. (2020). Intra-industry trade in Croatia: Trends and determinants. Croatian Economic Survey, 22(1), 5-39. doi:10.15179/ces.22.1.1
• Kikuchi, T., Yanagida, K., & Vo, H. (2018). The effects of mega-regional trade agreements on Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 55, 4-19. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.005
• Kliem, F. (2019). Thailand's ASEAN chairmanship at its mid-term: Three key issues to watch after the 34th ASEAN summit. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 1-15.
• Kong, Q., & Chen, W. (2022). Regulatory cooperation in mega-regional trade agreements. American Journal of Trade and Policy, 9(1), 7-18. doi:10.18034/ajtp.v9i1.615
• Meléndez-Ortiz, R. (2014). Mega-regionals: What is going on? In mega-regional trade agreements: Game-changers or costly distractions for the World Trading System? Global Agenda Council on Trade & Foreign Direct Investment. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
• Narayanan, B.G., & Khorana, S. (2017). Mega-regional trade agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? Journal of Economic Structures, 29(6). doi:10.1186/s40008-017-0090-y
• Natsuda, K., & Thoburn, J. (2021). Automotive Industrialization. Industrial Policy and Development in Southeast Asia. New York: Routledge.
• OICA. (2022a). World motor vehicle production by country/region and type. Retrieved from https://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/By-country-region-2021.pdf
• OICA. (2022b). World motor vehicle production by country/region and type. Retrieved from https://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/Passenger-Cars-2021.pdf
• OICA. (2022c). World motor vehicle production. OICA correspondents survey. Retrieved from https://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/World-Ranking-of-Manufacturers-1.pdf
• Palit, A. (2017). Mega-regional trade agreements and non-participating developing countries: Differential impacts, challenges and policy options. Competition & Change, 21(5), 417-434. doi:10.1177/1024529417729324
• Plummer, M.G. (2016). Mega-regionalism in Asia and its implications for Europe. Asian Survey, 56(6), 1040-1054. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26364402
• Shimizu, K. (2022). RCEP's great impact on Japan and East Asian economies. AJISS - Commentary, 295. Retrieved from https://www.jiia.or.jp/en/ajiss_commentary/rceps-great-impact-on-japan-and-eastasian-economies.html
• Solís, M., & Wilson, J.D. (2017). From APEC to mega-regionals: The evolution of the Asia-Pacific trade architecture. The Pacific Review , 30(6), 923-937. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1305438
• Statista. (2022). Global market share of the leading automakers. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/316786/global-market-share-of-the-leading-automakers/
• Top Foreign Stocks. (2022). Top 100 global OEM parts suppliers - ranked by sales of original equipment parts in 2018. Retrieved from https://topforeignstocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Top-100- Global-Auto-Parts-Suppliers-Page-1.png
• United Nations Comtrade. (2022). Retrieved from https://comtrade.un.org/data
• Verico, K. (2021). Mega-regionalism in Southeast Asia: Single- and dual-track options for ASEAN member states. Asian Economics Letters, 3(1). doi:10.46557/001c.27139
• Wilson, J.D. (2015). Mega-regional trade deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TPP and RCEP? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(2), 345-353. doi:10.1080/00472336.2014.956138
• World Bank. (2022). Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=US-EU-CA-MX-JP-CL-PE-NZ-AU-BN-ID-TH-SG-MY-KH-VN-LA-MM-PH-1W
• Worldometers. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
• Zarbà, C., Chinnici, G., & D'Amico, M. (2020). Novel food: The impact of innovation on the paths of the traditional food chain. Sustainability, 12, 555. doi:10.3390/su12020555

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/h.2023.57.1.61-85

Biblioteka Nauki

16729001