A contemporary religious political movement: LDS Church’s nation-wide political campaigns

• Authors: Maciej Potz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Drawing empirically on the examples of the Church of Latter-Day Saints’ (Mormon) participation in anti-ERA (Equal Rights Amendment) ratification campaign and its latest attempts to influence other political issues of moral consequences (such as same-sex marriage) in the United States, the paper attempts to analyse the dynamics of a contemporary religiously motivated political movement.Despite being, on any of these issues, a part of a wider coalition of political actors, the Mormon church displayed a specifically religious motivation, justification and modus operandi. Owing to strong religious legitimacy of their power – based on the doctrine of continuous revelation and enhanced by a sort of “personality cult” of the Church President-Prophet developing in late 20th century – the leadership of the church has been capable of effective grassroots mobilization, achieved through a disciplined universal priesthood structure.While, from the theoretical point of view, this Mormon political movement is of a traditional, “old” variation (ideological and social cohesion of members, well-defined, stable membership, hierarchical leadership etc.) it has nevertheless been relatively successful in modern political environment. The Mormon engagement, at least in the anti-ERA campaign, had made a difference certainly in Utah, and probably elsewhere as well.

Keywords

EN

Mormonism; political movements; religion and politics; Equal Rights Amendment; same-sex marriage

PL

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 1

Dates

published

2016

online

2017-04-04

Contributors

author

Maciej Potz

References

• Articles of Faith, art. 9, [in:] Pearl of Great Price, J. Smith, Filiquarian Publishing, 2006.
• Benson, E. T. Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet, speech at Brigham Young University delivered on February 26, 1980, http://speeches.byu.edu/?act=viewitem&id=88 (access 11.08.2014).
• Bigler, D. L. 1998. Forgotten Kingdom. The Mormon Theocracy in the American West, 1847–1896, Utah State University Press, Logan.
• Brennan Jr., W. J. 1993. The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification [in:] Readings in American Government and Politics, R. B. Ripley, E. E. Slotnick (eds.), Wadsworth, Belmont.
• Campbell, D. E., Monson, J. Q. 2007. Dry Kindling: A Political Profile of American Mormons, [in:] From Pews to Polling Places: Faith and Politics in the American Religious Mosaic, J. Wilson (ed.), Georgetown University Press, Washington.
• Cannon, E. 1978. If We want to Get Up, We Have to Get On, “Ensign”, November, https://www.lds.org/ensign/1978/11/if-we-want-to-go-up-we-have-to-get-on?lang=eng (access 12.08.2014).
• Church Instructs Leaders on Same-Sex Marriage, January 10, 2014, http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/church-instructs-leaders-on-same-sex-marriage (access 17.08.2014).
• Crapo, R. Chronology of Mormon/LDS Involvement in Same-Sex Marriage Politics, http://www.mormonsocialscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Crapo-R1997-Chronology-of-LDS-Involvement-In-Same-Sex-Marriage-Politics.pdf [accessed: 17.08.2014]
• Della Porta, D., Diani, M. 2006. Social movements. An introduction, Blackwell, Malden-Oxford-Carlton.
• Equal Rights Amendment, “Deseret News”, January 11, 1975, p. 16, http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=Aul-kAQHnToC&dat=19750111&printsec=frontpage&hl=en (access 21.08.2014).
• First Presidency Issues Statement Opposing Equal Rights Amendment, 1976, https://www.lds.org/ensign/1976/12/news-of-the-church?lang=eng (access 9.08.2014).
• Gordon, E. E., Gillespie, W. 2012. The Culture of Obedience and the Politics of Stealth: Mormon Mobilization Against ERA and Same-Sex Marriage, "Religion and Politics", no. 5.
• Hansen, K. 1967. Quest for Empire. Political Kingdom of God and the Council of Fifty in Mormon History, Nebraska University Press, Lincoln.
• Kendall White, O. 1989. Mormonism and the Equal Rights Amendment, “Journal of Church and State”, vol. 31, spring.
• Kintz, L. 1998. Clarity, Mothers, and the Mass-Mediated National Soul: A Defense of Ambiguity, [in:] Media, Culture and the Religious Right, L. Kintz, J. Lesage (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis–London.
• Mansbridge, J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
• Martin, W. 1996. With God on Our Side. The Rise of the Religious Right in America, Broadway Books, New York.
• Moore, C. 2008. LDS Church issues statement on same-sex marriage, September 10, http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700257603/LDS-Church-issues-statement-on-same-sex-marriage.html?pg=all (access 16.08.2014).
• O’Dea, T. 1964. The Mormons, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
• Obergefell v. Hodges (576 US. 14–556), 2015.
• “Official Declaration 2”, Doctrine and Covenants, https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/od/2?lang=eng (access 11.08.2014).
• Perry, L., Cronin, C. 2012. Mormons in American Politics. From Persecution to Power, Praeger, Santa Barbara.
• Potz, M. 2008. Granice wolności religijnej, Fundacja Nauki Polskiej, Wrocław.
• Potz, M. 2013. Religious doctrine as a factor of stability of political systems. A study of two North American theocracies, “Politics and Religion Journal”, vol. 7, no. 2.
• Quinn, D. M. 1997. The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power, Signature Books, Salt Lake City.
• Quinn, D. M. 2000. Prelude to the National "Defense of Marriage" Campaign: Civil Discrimination Against Feared or Despised Minorities, “Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought”, vol. 33, no. 3.
• Response to the Supreme Court decision legalizing same‐sex marriage in the United States, June 29, 2015, LDS Church Newsroom, http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/top-church-leaders-counsel-members-after-supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-decision (access 11.08.2015).
• Riess, R., Kimball Bigelow, C. 2005. Mormonism for Dummies, Wiley, Indianapolis.
• Tanner, N. E. 1979. The Debate is Over, “Ensign”, August, https://www.lds.org/ensign/1979/08/the-debate-is-over?lang=eng (access 12.08.2014).
• The Divine Institution of Marriage, August 13, 2008, http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/the-divine-institution-of-marriage (access 16.08.2014).
• van Beek, W. 2011. The Infallibility Trap: the Sacralisation of Religious Authority, “International Journal of Mormon Studies”, vol. 4.
• Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society, University of California Press: Berkeley–Los Angeles.
• Wilcox, C. 1996. Onward Christian Soldiers. The Religious Right in American Politics, Westview Press, Boulder.
• Williams, P. 2002. America’s Religions. From Their Origins to the Twenty-first Century, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago.
• Woodruff, W. 1890. Address at 61 Semiannual General Conference of the Church, October 6, https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/od/1?lang=eng (access 30.08.2014).
• Young, N. J. 2007. “The Era is a Moral Issue”: The Mormon Church, LDS Women, and the Defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment, “American Quarterly”, vol. 59, no. 3.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/k.2016.23.1.147