Democracy in Constituent Moments: Exploring the Spanish Constitutional Debate of 1931 through Political Theory and Conceptual History

• Authors: Francisco J. Bellido
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper aims to answer the question of why constituent moments are relevant to political theory. It hypothesises the Spanish constitutional debate of 1931 as a case of conceptual innovation in parliamentary politics by arguing that debates in constituent moments entail a special kind of parliamentary argumentation when new political regimes are established. There, all sorts of theoretical, normative, historical, and institutional aspects are discussed to deliberate on the future character and functioning of a political regime. From a methodological point of view, this analysis draws on the revision of arguments and political terms used by MPs during the Spanish constituent assembly of 1931. The first part of the article emphasises the potentiality of constitutional debates for political theory and conceptual history, the two following chapters contextualise the historical and intellectual keys of 1931 Spain, the fourth and final part briefly explains two cases of conceptual controversy around the terms “state” and “sovereignty”. Based on the evidence provided by this study, the article concludes that the Spanish constitutional debate of 1931 is a fertile case to explore conceptual innovation of interwar legal and political theory.

Keywords

EN

constituent moments, Spanish constitutional debate of 1931, conceptual innovation, political theory

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio K – Politologia
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 26
• Issue: 2

Dates

published

2019

online

2019-12-28

Contributors

author

Francisco J. Bellido

References

• Aragón Reyes, M. 1996. Parlamentarismo y antiparlamentarismo en el primer tercio del siglo XX, “Revista de Estudios Políticos”, No. 93.
• Araquistáin, L. 1930. El ocaso de un régimen, España, Madrid.
• Cuenca Toribio, J.M. 1995. Parlamentarismo y antiparlamentarismo, Congreso de los Diputados, Madrid.
• Diario de Sesiones de la Cortes Constituyentes de la República Española (DSCCRE) [Proceedings of the Constituent Assembly of the Second Spanish Republic], https://app.congreso.es/est_sesiones/ (access: 30.05.2019).
• Fernández Sarasola, I. 2009. Los partidos políticos en el pensamiento español: de la Ilustración a nuestros días, Marcial Pons, Madrid.
• García Santos, J.F. 1980. Léxico y política de la Segunda República, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca.
• Ginsburg, T. (ed.) 2012. Comparative Constitutional Design, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Gil Pecharromán, J. 1989. La Segunda República, Historia 16, Madrid.
• González Calleja, E., Cobo Romero, F., Martínez Rus, A., Sánchez Pérez, F. 2015. La Segunda República Española, Pasado y Presente, Barcelona.
• Gordillo Pérez, L., Martín, S., Vázquez Alonso, V. 2017. Constitución de 1931: estudios jurídicos sobre el momento republicano español, Marcial Pons, Madrid.
• Juliá, S. 2009. La Constitución de 1931, Iustel, Madrid.
• Palonen, K. 2019. Parliamentary Thinking: Procedure, Rhetoric and Time, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Reglamento Provisional de las Cortes Constituyentes [Provisional Rules of Procedure of the Constituent Assembly], “Gaceta de Madrid”, 12.07.1931, p. 341, https://www.boe.es/datos/pdfs/BOE//1931/193/A00339-00344.pdf (access: 27.05.2019).
• Tusell, J. 1982. Las constituyentes de 1931: unas elecciones de transición, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid.
• Tusell, J. 2004. El Directorio y la Segunda República: la dictadura de Primo de Rivera, el fin de la Monarquía y la República (1923–1936), Espasa Calpe, Madrid.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/k.2019.26.2.45-54