“With mine own tears I wash away my balm”: The King’s two bodies in Shakespeare’s Richard II and King Lear.

• Authors: Sélima Lejri
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of this paper is to delineate the representation of kingship in Tudor and Stuart England and its articulation in Shakespeare’s political drama, through the examples of Richard II (1599) and King Lear (1606), two illustrative plays of the respective eras. Conceived of as two-bodied, the sovereign is, from early medieval times, positioned in an uneasy liminal state whereby his natural body is also the incarnation of the mystical concept of the everlasting Body politic. Anxieties over this seemingly unbreakable continuity of mystical kingship become nonetheless palpable as Queen Elizabeth I lies dying, leaving no heir to the throne of England. The first Stuart monarch hence reinforces the doctrine of The Divine Right of Kings by confidently advancing the unique precedence of godhead over manhood in the monarch. Set in this context, Shakespeare’s two political figures question the validity of the king’s impregnable nature as they grapple with their human condition exposed to all mortal ills. When Richard II’s “tears wash away (his) balm” and his meta-physiological body withal, Shakespeare exposes the frailties underneath the fiction of the monarch’s two-bodied nature parodied in King Lear as “every inch a king”.

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 38
• Issue: 2

Dates

published

2014

online

2015-05-20

Contributors

author

Sélima Lejri

References

• Brigden, S. (2000): New Worlds, Lost Worlds: The Rule of the Tudors 1485-1603
• London, Penguin.
• Burns, J. H. (1996): The True Law of Kingship. Concepts of Monarchy in Early
• Modern Scotland, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Hart,V. (1994): Art and Magic in the Court of the Stuarts, London and New York:
• Routledge.
• Levin, C. (1994): The Heart and Stomach of a King: Elizabeth I and the Politics of
• Sex and Power, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
• Lockyer, R. (2005): Tudor and Stuart Britain, 1485-1714, Edinburgh: Pearson
• Education.
• Frye, S. (1996): Elizabeth I. The Competition for Representation, New York: Oxford
• University Press.
• Hadfield, A. (2004): Shakespeare and Renaissance Politics, London: Thomson
• Learning/The Arden Shakespeare.
• Kantorowicz, E. H. (1957): The King’s Two Bodies. A Study in Medieval Political
• Theology, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Leggatt, A. (1988): Shakespeare’s Political Drama. The History Plays and the Roman
• Plays, London and New York: Routledge.
• McCoy, R. (2002): Alterations of State. Sacred Kingship in the English Reformation,
• New York: Columbia University Press.
• McLaren, A. N. (2004): Political Culture in The Reign of Elizabeth I. Queen and
• Commonwealth 1558-1585, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nuttall, A.D. (2007): Shakespeare the Thinker, New Haven and London: Yale
• University Press.
• Parker, W. R. (1996): Milton: A Biography. Volume I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Shakespeare, W. (1961): King Richard II, ed. Peter Ure, London, New York:
• Routledge.
• Shakespeare, W. (1992): The Tragedy of King Lear, ed. Jay L. Halio, Cambridge, The
• New Cambridge Shakespeare.
• Shakespeare, W. (2005): Henry V, in The Complete Works, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Suhamy, H. ed. (2004): Richard II. William Shakespeare, Paris: Ellipses.
• Tanner, J R. (1960): Constitutional Documents of the Reign of James I. A. D.1603-
• 1625, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/lsmll.2014.38.2.43