Does Scaffolding-Based Instruction Improve Writing Performance? The Case of Jordanian EFL Learners

• Authors: Salameh Fleih Obeiah , Ruba Fahmi Bataineh
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The present study examines the potential effect of scaffolding instruction on Jordanian EFL tenth-grade students’ overall writing performance and their performance on the sub-skills of focus, development, organization, conventions and word choice. The study follows a quasi-experimental experimental/control group, pre-/post test design. In the experimental group, 20 female tenth-grade students from the North-Eastern Badia Directorate of Education (Jordan) were taught to generate ideas, structure, draft, and edit their essays using agency scaffolding and the scaffolding principles of contextual support, continuity, intersubjectivity, flow, contingency and handover, within the Zone of Proximal Development. Another group of 28 students was instructed conventionally per the guidelines outlined in the Teacher’s Book. After the treatment, descriptive statistics and ANCOVA were used to analyze the students’ scores on the pre-test and the post test. The results showed that the scaffolding instruction group outperformed the control group (at a≤ 0.05) in their overall writing performance and in their performance on all writing sub-skills except the sub-skill of development.

DE

Der Band enthält die Abstracts ausschließlich in englischer Sprache.

FR

Le numéro contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.

RU

Том не содержит аннотаций на английском языке.

Keywords

EN

Jordan; scaffolding; writing performance; Zone of proximal development

DE

Englisch lernen; EFL; Entwicklung der Schreibkompetenz

FR

acquisition de la langue anglaise; EFL; enseignement de la compétence écrite

RU

изучение английского языка; EFL; развитие письменных навыков

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 39
• Issue: 2

Dates

published

2015

online

2016-03-31

Contributors

author

Salameh Fleih Obeiah

author

Ruba Fahmi Bataineh

References

• Abu Jaleel, A. (2001). An Investigation of Strategies of Teaching Writing for Ninth and Tenth-graders in Irbid Schools. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
• Al-Gomoul, M. (2011). Teaching and Assessing Writing Strategies for Secondary School Students and Investigating Teachers’ and Students’ Attitudes towards Writing Practice. Kamla-Raj, 3(1), 25-36.
• Al-Jarf, R. (2007). Online Instruction and Creative Writing by Saudi EFL Freshman Students, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Asian EFL Journal, 22(1), 92-107.
• Al-Omari, E. (2004). EFL Instructors’ Practices for Writing Assessment in Jordanian Universities. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
• Al-Quran, M. (2002). The Class-function Confusion in the Complex Sentence Structure: A Study of EFL Student Composition Errors. DIRASAT: Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(3), 821–835.
• Al-Sharah, N. (1988). An Analysis of the Problems of Discourse in the Writing of English Majors at Yarmouk University. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
• Bani Younis, R. (1997). Assessing Student’s Receptivity to their Instructors’ Responses in their Foreign Language Writing at both Public and Private Universities in Jordan. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
• Baradaran, A. & Sarfarazi, B. (2011). The Impact of Scaffolding on the Iranian EFL Learners’ English Academic Writing. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 2265-2273.
• Barnard, R. & Campbell, L. (2005). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Process Writing: The Scaffolding of Learning in a University Context. The TESOLANZ Journal, 13, 76-88.
• Bodrova, E. (1998). Scaffolding Emergent Writing in the Zone of Proximal Development. Literacy Teaching and Learning Journal. 3(2), 1-18. Retrieved 6 April 2015 from https://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/LTL/LTL_Vol3_No2-998/LTL_3.2-Bodrova-Leong.pdf.
• Clark, K. & Graves, M. (2005). Scaffolding Students’ Comprehension of Text. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 570-580.
• Eickholdt, L.A. (2004). Scaffolding in the Writing Workshop. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University, U.S.A.
• Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching Second Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom. Portsmouth (New Hampshire): Heinemann.
• Hannafin, M.J., Land, S. & Oliver, K. (1999). Open Learning Environments: Foundations, Methods and Models. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 115-140. Mahwah (New Jersey): Erlbaum.
• Harris, M. (1992). Collaboration is not Collaboration is not Collaboration: Writing Center Tutorials vs. Peer-Response Groups. Composition and Communication, 43(3), 369-83.
• Harrison, R. (2004). The Convergence of Community and Communication Online Communities and Japanese Language Education. Retrieved 22 May 2014 from http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/repository/00523021.pdf.
• Hawari, K. (1996). An Analysis Study of the Evaluation Procedures of Writing Employed by EFL Teachers of the First Secondary Grade in Al-Mafraq District. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
• Hayati, M. & Ziyaeimehr, Z. (2011). A Study on the Effect of Scaffolding through Joint Construction Tasks on the Composition of EFL Learners. Studies in Literature and Language, (2)3, 92-102.
• Holton, D. & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and Metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37 (2), 127-143.
• Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.
• Lantolf, J. (2000). Second Language Learning as a Mediated Process. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96.
• Lutz, S., Guthrie, J. & Davis, M. (2006). Scaffolding for Engagement in Elementary School Reading Instruction. Journal of Education and Research, 100(1), 3-20.
• Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second Language Learning Theories. London: Edward Arnold.
• Schwieter, J. (2010). Developing Second Language Writing through Scaffolding in the Zone of Proximal Development: A Magazine Project for an Authentic Audience. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, (7)10, 31-45. Retrieved 5 April 2015 from http://legacy.wlu.ca/documents/44815/Developing_second_language_writing.pdf.
• Soles, D. (2005). The Academic Essay- How to Plan, Draft, Write and Revise. Somerset (U.K.): Bishops Lydeard.
• Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy, and Authenticity. New York: Longman.
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. Thinking and Speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of General Psychology (37-285). New York: Plenum Press.
• Wang, Y & Laio, H. C. (2008). The Application of Learning Portfolio Assessment for Students in the Technological and Vocational Education System. Asian EFL Journal, 10(2), 132-154.
• Wood, D.J. (1998). How Children Think and Learn. Oxford: Blackwell.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/lsmll.2015.39.2.106