Designing the welfare state: Selected building metaphors of the welfare state across the British press

• Authors: Malgorzata Paprota
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper, drawing on insights from discourse-historical approach to discourse analysis and applying Conceptual Metaphor theory, examines selected BUILDING metaphors of the welfare state in a corpus of four British newspapers. The paper compares the use of these metaphors in the four newspapers and considers their argumentative function, finding that while the metaphors largely overlap between the newspapers, their argumentative functions are more though not completely distinct, legitimising government reforms of the welfare state in the conservative newspapers, with the left-leaning newspapers using them to support and oppose these reforms.

DE

Der Band enthält die Abstracts ausschließlich in englischer Sprache.

FR

Le numéro contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.

RU

Том не содержит аннотаций на английском языке.

Keywords

EN

welfare state; metaphor analysis; conceptual metaphors; media discourse; political discourse

DE

FR

RU

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 2

Dates

published

2017

online

2018-01-02

Contributors

author

Malgorzata Paprota

References

• Ahrens, K. 2010. Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. In: L. Cameron, A. Deignan, G. Low, Z. Todd (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 185-208.
• Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Fairclough, N., Wodak, R. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258-84.
• Hart, C. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321-347.
• Krzyżanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R. 2009. Introduction. In: A. Triandafyllidou, R. Wodak, M. Krzyżanowski (eds.), The European Public Sphere and the Media. Europe in Crisis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-12.
• Krzyżanowski, M. 2009. The discursive construction of Europe and values in the coverage of the Polish 1981 ‘State of War’ in the European press. In: A. Triandafyllidou, R. Wodak, M. Krzyżanowski (eds.). The European Public Sphere and the Media. Europe in Crisis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 174-199.
• Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Lu, L.W. L., Ahrens, K. 2008. Ideological influence on BUILDING metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 383-408.
• Musolff, A. 2006. Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(1), 23-28.
• Musolff, A. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
• Ponsford, D. 2015. NRS claims 94 per cent of UK adults read national newspaper or magazine monthly. Press Gazette. 26 August 2015. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/uk-regional-daily-print-sales-down-102-cent-birmingham-Mail-loses-quarter-sales-year-year/
• Reisigl, M., Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
• Semino, E. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., Pasma, T. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Timmins, N. 2001. The Five Giants. A Biography of the Welfare State. London: HarperCollins.
• Williams, R. 1988. Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana Press.
• Wodak, R. 2001. The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63-94.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/lsmll.2017.41.2.83