Family Resemblance: Frankenstein’s Monster and the Phantom of the Opera in ”Penny Dreadful” (2014-2016)

• Authors: Dorota Babilas
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The Creature of Frankenstein never managed to fulfil his desire of finding a loving partner in Mary Shelley’s novel, but his symbolic progeny continues to haunt the modern popular culture. The article discusses the case of “family resemblance” between Frankenstein’s Creature and the title antihero of Gaston Leroux’s The Phantom of the Opera. In their respective literary sources, they share an inborn deformity, an appreciation for music, a romantic yearning for love and acceptance matched with sociopathic violence. Recently, the TV series Penny Dreadful elaborates on these allusions, conflating the narratives by Shelley and Leroux, as well as their later adaptations.

DE

Der Artikel enthält Zusammenfassungen nur in Englisch.

FR

L'article contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.

Keywords

EN

Penny Dreadful; Frankenstein; The Phantom of the Opera; mash-up; adaptation

DE

FR

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 43
• Issue: 2

Dates

published

2019

online

2019-07-03

Contributors

author

Dorota Babilas

References

• Barthelme, D. (1970). City Life. New York: Pocket.
• Blanke, H. (Producer), & Curtiz, M. (Director). (1933). The Mystery of the Wax Museum [Motion picture]. The United States: Warner Bros.
• Castle, W. (Producer), & Polanski, R. (Director). Rosemary’s Baby [Motion picture]. The United States: Paramout Pictures.
• Clubbe, J. (1991). The Tempest-toss’d Summer of 1816: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Byron Journal, 19, 26-40.
• Derrida, J. (1994). Spectres of Marx (P. Kamuf, Trans.). New York: Routledge.
• Dickerson, V. D. (1993). The Ghost of a Self: Female Identity in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Journal of Popular Culture, 27(3), 79-91.
• Forsyth, F. (1999). The Phantom of Manhattan. New York: Bantam Books.
• Halberstam, J. (1995). Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Hand, R. J., & Wilson, M. (2002). Grand-Guignol. The French Theatre of Horror. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
• Hawkins, H. (1990). Classics and Trash. Traditions and Taboos in High Literature and Popular Modern Genres. London: Harverster Wheatsheaf.
• Hogle, J. E. (2002a). The Undergrounds of the Phantom of the Opera: Sublimation and the Gothic in Leroux’s Novel and Its Progeny. Houndmills: Palgrave.
• Hogle, J. E. (2002b). Introduction. The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hogle, J. E. (2002c). The Gothic Crosses the Channel. In A. Horner (Ed.), European Gothic: A Spirited Exchange 1760-1960 (pp. 204-229). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Hugo, V. (2006/1869). The Man Who Laughs. Los Angeles: Norilana Books.
• Hutcheon, L. (2013). A Theory of Adaptation. London and New York: Routledge.
• Kay, S. (1990). Phantom. New York: Doubleday.
• King, S. (1983). Danse Macabre. New York: Berkeley Books.
• Koszarski, R. (1979). The Mystery of the Wax Museum. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Laemmle Jr., C. (Producer), & Whale, J. (Director). (1931). Frankenstein [Motion picture]. The United States: Universal.
• Laemmle, C. (Producer), & Julian, R. (Director). (1925). The Phantom of the Opera [Motion picture]. The United States: Universal.
• Leroux, G. (2004/1910). The Phantom of the Opera (J-M. & R. Lofficier, Trans.). Tarzana: Black Coat Press.
• Levine, G. (1973). Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism. Novel, Fall, 14-30.
• Lloyd Webber, A. (1986). The Phantom of the Opera. Lyrics by Ch. Hart & R. Stilgoe. London: Her Majesty’s Theatre.
• Lloyd Webber, A. (2010). Love Never Dies. Lyrics by G. Slater. London: Adelphi Theatre.
• Lofficier, J.-M., & R. Lofficier (2004). His Father’s Eyes. In G. Leroux, The Phantom of the Opera. Tarzana: Black Coat Press.
• Logan, J. (Creator). (2014-2016). Penny Dreadful [TV series]. The United States & the United Kingdom: Showtime.
• Melor, A. K. (2001). Frankenstein, Racial Science and the Yellow Peril. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, Vol. 21, 1-28.
• Mitchell, K. (2010). History and Cultural Memory in Neo-Victorian Fiction: Victorian Afterimages. Houndmills: Palgrave.
• Moretti, F. (1983). Signs Taken For Wonders: Essays in the Sociology of Literary Forms. London, New York: Verso.
• Myers, A. (2010). His Fathers Eyes by Jean-Marc and Randy Lofficier (2004). The Phantom Project. Retrieved June 27, 2018 from http://phantomproject.pbworks.com/w/page/24625099/His%20Father's%20Eyes%20by%20Jean-Marc%20and%20Randy%20Lofficier%20.
• O’Rourke, J. (1989). Nothing More Unnatural: Mary Shelley’s Revision of Rousseau. ELH, 56(3), 543-59.
• Picard, T. (2016). Sur les traces d’un fantôme. La civilisation de l’opéra. Paris: Fayard.
• Sanger, J. & Brooks, M. (Producers), & Lynch, D. (Director). (1980). The Elephant Man [Motion picture]. The United States & The United Kingdom: Brooksfilms.
• Shankun, Z. (Producer), & Weibang, M-X. (Director). (1937). Song at Midnight[Motion picture]. The Republic of China: Xinhua Film Company.
• Shelley, M. (2005/1818). Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus. [Kindle]. New York: Barnes and Noble. Retrieved January 21, 2018, from www.amazon.com.
• Siciliano, S. (1994). The Angel of the Opera. New York: O. Penzler Books.
• Sweet, M. (2002). Inventing the Victorians. London: Faber & Faber.
• Veeder, W. (1986). Mary Shelley and Frankenstein: The Fate of Androgyny. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/lsmll.2019.43.2.135-143