PL EN


2019 | 43 | 4 |
Article title

An explorative study on media effects in vocabulary learning

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This article deals with the best media or media adequate ways to memorize vocabulary. An empirical study is presented in which test persons had to memorize vocabulary in an unknown language in three different ways. Thus, three experimental groups were presented Hungarian vocabulary to be learnt. The first group learnt a vocabulary list from a sheet of paper, the second one from the computer monitor, but without any animation, and the third one from an animated flash file. In the present article, the results of this study are reported and discussed.
DE
Der Band enthält die Abstracts ausschließlich in englischer Sprache.
FR
L'article contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.
Keywords
Year
Volume
43
Issue
4
Physical description
Dates
published
2019
online
2019-12-30
Contributors
author
References
  • Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking Reading Comprehension Exams on Screen or on Paper? A Metacognitive Analysis of Learning Texts under Time Pressure. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 1816-1828.
  • Beatty, K. (2013), Teaching and Researching: Computer-Assisted Language Learning. London: Routledge.
  • Brandl, K. (2002). Integrating Internet-based Reading Materials Into the Foreign Language Curriculum: From Teacher-to Student-centered. Language Learning and Technology, 6(3), 87-107.
  • Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (2000). Networked Multimedia Environments for Second Language Acquisition. In M. Warschauer, & R .Kern (Eds.), Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp, 151-170). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/ CBO9781139524735.009.
  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media Will Never Influence Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. DOI: 10.1007/bf02299088.
  • Dalton, B., & Grisham D. L. (2011). 10 Ways to Use Technology to Build Vocabulary. LDonline. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from http://www.ldonline.org/article/52248?theme=print.
  • Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to Teach English with Technology. Harlow: Pearson.
  • Giessen, H. (2011). Medien- und medieneffektabhängiges Vokabellernen. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2(2), 325-336.
  • Khatib, M., Hassanzadeh, M., & Rezaei, S. (2011). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners. International Education Studies, 4(2). DOI: 10.5539/ies.v4n2p144.
  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will Media Influence Learning? Reframing the Debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
  • Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68.
  • McCombs, B. L. (2000). Assessing the Role of Educational Technology in the Teaching and Learning Process: A Learner-centered Perspective. In The Secre-tary’s Conference on Educational Technology 2000. Washington: USA Dept of Education. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED452830. (White Paper).
  • Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1-10.
  • Mullamaa, K. (2010), ICT in Language Learning - Benefits and Methodological Implications. International Education Studies, 3, 40-45. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v3n1p38.
  • Nathan, M., & Robinson, C. (2001). Considerations of Learning and Learning Research: Revisiting the “Media Effects” Debate. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(1), 69-88.
  • Park, H., Yang, J., & Hsieh, Y. (2014). University Level Second Language Readers’ Online Reading and Comprehension Strategies. Language Learning and Technology, 18(3), 148-172.
  • Pavičič Takac, V. (2008), Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Rasekh, Z., & Ranjbari, R. (2003). Metacognitive Strategy Training for Vocabulary Learning. TESL-EJ, 7, 1-15.
  • Reeves, T. C. (1998), The Impact of Media and Technology in Schools. Gütersloh: A Research Report Prepared for the Bertelsmann Foundation. Retrieved July 30, 2008, from http://www.athensacademy.org/instruct/media_ tech/reeves0.html.
  • Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended Learning. London: Macmillan Publishers.
  • Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student Perceptions on Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millennium. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 165-180. Retrieved January 8, 2018, from http://www.llt.msu. edu/vol6num1/pdf/steppgreany.pdf.
  • Tanaka, H., Yonesaka, S. M., & Ueno Y. (2015), An E-portfolio to Enhance Sustainable Vocabulary Learning in English. The EuroCALL Review, 23(1). Retrieved January 8, 2018, from http://eurocall.webs.upv.es/index. php?m=menu_00&n=news_23_1#tanaka.
  • Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M. (Eds.) (2012), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., & Norlander, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and Paper Presentation on Consumption and Production of Information: Psychological and Physiological Factors. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21, 377-394.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_lsmll_2019_43_4_147-154
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.