Evolution and Current State of the American Model of Administrative Procedure: Towards Reform and Conceptual Understanding

• Authors: Olena O. Markova , Viktoria O. Pankratova , Kateryna Naumenko , Lesia L. Honcharenko

Title variants

PL

Ewolucja i stan obecny amerykańskiego modelu postępowania administracyjnego. W kierunku reformy i ujęcia koncepcyjnego

Abstracts

PL

Procedura administracyjna w USA jest integralną częścią prawa administracyjnego. Ma ona charakter uniwersalny, pełni bowiem funkcję skutecznych narzędzi regulacji postępowania i działalności funkcjonariuszy władz państwowych, zwalczania korupcji oraz ochrony praw i uzasadnionych interesów obywateli. Właściwe agencje wydają przepisy mające moc prawną. Obecnie perspektywiczne rządzenie w dużej mierze zależy od decyzji polityki państwowej podejmowanych w toku stanowienia prawa państwowego, dlatego niektóre aspekty współczesnego modelu postępowania administracyjnego w USA powinny zostać zrewidowane w celu dalszych reform. Celem artykułu jest przeprowadzenie samodzielnych badań nad kształtowaniem się i aktualnym stanem amerykańskiego modelu postępowania administracyjnego. Aby osiągnąć ten cel, zastosowano zestaw ogólnych metod naukowych i specjalnych. Wiodącą metodą w procesie badawczym była dialektyczna metoda poznania zjawisk i procesów, która pozwoliła na określenie stanu, obszarów i perspektyw rozwoju badań naukowych oraz rozwiązań legislacyjnych w zakresie regulacji prawnych i aprobaty amerykańskiego modelu postępowania administracyjnego. Wyciągnięty przez autorów wniosek pozwolił na sformułowanie rozumienia koncepcji amerykańskiego modelu postępowania administracyjnego.

EN

Administrative procedure in the United States of America is an integral part of administrative law. It is universal in its nature as it plays the role of an effective tool to regulate the conduct and activities of officials of state authorities, to combat corruption, and to protect the rights and legitimate interests of citizens. The relevant agencies issue rules and regulations that have the force of law. Currently, progressive governance largely depends on decisions of the state policy made in the course of government rule-making, and therefore certain aspects of the modern model of administrative procedure in the US should be revised with a view to further reform. The objective of the article is to conduct independent research on the formation and current condition of the American model of administrative procedure. A set of general scientific and special methods was used to achieve this objective. The leading method in the process of research was the dialectical method of cognition of phenomena and processes, which made it possible to determine the condition, areas and prospects for the development of scientific research and legislative developments in legal regulation and approbation of the American model of administrative procedure. The conclusion drawn by the authors made it possible to form a conceptual understanding of the American model of administrative procedure.

Keywords

EN

government rule-making; administrative procedure; progressive governance; model of administrative procedure; United States of America

PL

stanowienie prawa państwowego; postępowanie administracyjne; perspektywiczne rządzenie; model postępowania administracyjnego; USA

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 33
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 123-141

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Olena O. Markova

• Sumy Branch of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

author

Viktoria O. Pankratova

• Sumy State University, Ukraine

author

Kateryna Naumenko

• Sumy Branch of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

author

Lesia L. Honcharenko

• Sumy Branch of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

References

• Beermann J.M., Administrative Law, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010.
• Berry C.R., Gersen J.E., Agency Design and Political Control, “Yale Law Journal” 2017, vol. 126(4).
• Bertelli A.M., Busuioc M., Reputation-Sourced Authority and the Prospect of Unchecked Bureaucratic Power, “Public Administration Review” 2021, vol. 81(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13281.
• Chudyk N., Vivchar O., Strategy of Strengthening the Economic Security of Enterprises of Network Structures: Pragmatics and Key Vectors of Development, “Law, Policy and Security” 2023, vol. 1(1).
• DeLeo J.D., Administrative Law, Boston 2008.
• DeMuth С., Can the Administrative State Be Tamed?, “Journal of Legal Analysis” 2016, vol. 8(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/law003.
• Epstein R.A., The Role of Guidances in Modern Administrative Procedure: The Case for “De Novo” Review, “Journal of Legal Analysis” 2015, vol. 8(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lav012.
• Johnstone I., Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit, “American Journal of International Law” 2008, vol. 102(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30034539.
• Karamanukyan D.T., The Legal Nature of Administrative Agencies of the USA, “Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy” 2016, no. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2016-1-85-90. [in Russian]
• Kessler J., Sabel C., The Uncertain Future of Administrative Law, “Daedalus” 2021, vol. 150(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01867.
• Kisil Z., On the Issue of Integration of Civil Society Institutions in Preventing Corruption in Ukraine: Administrative and Legal Dimension, “Social and Legal Studios” 2022, vol. 5(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-2-31-37.
• Kochan D.J., The Commenting Power: Agency Accountability through Public Participation, “Oklahoma Law Review” 2018, vol. 70(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3006157.
• Lu W., Comparative Analysis of the Establishment of Chinese and American Think Tanks, “Foreign Affairs” 2021, vol. 31(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.31(5).2021.44-51.
• Markova О., Comparative Legal Analysis Types of Administrative Procedure, “Legal Bulletin” 2020, vol. 3(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/yuv.v0i3.1902.
• Noll R.G., McCcubbins M.D., Weingas B.R., Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control, “Journal of Law Economics and Organization” 1987, vol. 3(2).
• Rosenbloom D.H., Administrative Law for Public Managers, London 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494239.
• Serneda O., Tsummer A., Prerequisites for the 1994 Budapest Memorandum in the Context of Ukrainian-American Relations, “Foreign Affairs” 2022, vol. 32(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.32(5).2022.24-31.
• Yackee S.W., The Politics of Rulemaking in the United States, “Annual Review of Political Science” 2019, vol. 22(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050817-092302.
• Yackee S.W., The “Science” of Policy Development during Administrative Rulemaking, “Policy Studies Journal” 2021, vol. 49(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12350.
• Yesimov S., Borovikova V., Administrative and Legal Implementation of the Rights of Business Entities, “Social and Legal Studios” 2022, vol. 5(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-3-16-22.
• Ziekow J., Administrative Procedures and Processes, [in:] Public Administration in Germany: Governance and Public Management, eds. S. Kuhlmann, I. Proeller, D. Schimanke, J. Ziekow, Cham 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_11.
• Ahn S.C., Legitimacy, Flexibility and Administrative Law, 2021, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=etd (access: 10.2.2024).
• Balla S., Bull R., Dooling B., Hammond E., Herz M., Livermore M., Noveck B.S., Mass, Computer-Generated, and Fraudulent Comments, 1.6.2021, https://cutt.ly/IERZqU0 (access: 14.9.2023).
• Barnes J., Towards a Third Generation of Administrative Procedures, 29–30.4.2016, https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/conference/compadmin/compadmin16_barnes_towards.pdf (access: 10.2.2024).
• Coglianese C., Administrative Law: The U.S. and Beyond, 2016, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2657&context=faculty_scholarship (access: 15.9.2023).
• Course Hero, The New Social Regulation and the Transformation of Administrative Law, 4.2.2008, https://www.coursehero.com/file/p3p83aa/Transmission-Belt-Theory-of-Administrative-Containment-The-regulatory-agency-is (access: 18.9.2023).
• Duncan D.G., Levey B.R., DOJ Issues “Rich Menu of Options” for Congress to Revise the Administrative Procedure Act, 18.8.2020, https://www.natlawreview.com/article/doj-issues-rich-menu-options-congress-to-revise-administrative-procedure-act (access: 11.9.2023).
• Giacinto C. della, Administrative Procedure in Europe, 31.10.2022, https://www.theregreview.org/2022/10/31/della-cananea-administrative-procedure-in-europe (access: 7.9.2023).
• Huth V., Celebrating the 75th Anniversary of the Administrative Procedure Act, 11.6.2021, https://www.gsa.gov/blog/2021/06/11/celebrating-the-75th-anniversary-of-the-administrative-procedure-act (access: 10.2.2024).
• Office of Public Affairs, Justice Department Releases Report on Modernizing the Administrative Procedure Act, 11.8.2020, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-releases-report-modernizing-administrative-procedure-act (access: 10.2.2024).
• Sant’Ambrogio M., Staszewski G., Public Engagement with Agency Rulemaking, 19.11.2018, https://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Public%20Engagement%20in%20Rulemaking%20Final%20Report.pdf (access: 10.2.2024).
• Walker C.J., A Reform Agenda for Administrative Adjudication, 2021, https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2021/reform-agenda-administrative-adjudication (access: 11.9.2023).
• Administrative Procedure Act, 1946.
• Constitution of the United States, 1787.
• E-Government Act, 2002.
• Model State Administrative Procedure Act, 2009.
• New York State Administrative Procedure Act, 1975.
• United States Code, 2019.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/sil.2024.33.1.123-141

Biblioteka Nauki

31344045