ZNACZENIE SPORU NATURALIZM VS. ANTYNATURALIZM DLA NAUK PRAWNYCH

• Authors: Mariusz Krawczyk
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł nie zawiera abstraktu w języku polskim

EN

The dispute between naturalists and antinaturalists dates back to the 19th century but the case still remains valid. The article talks about these two opposing positions and their relevance to the legal sciences. Naturalism is based on a postulate of the universality of all studies. It states that the empirical knowledge is the only legitimate type of knowledge about the world. Moreover, the naturalists consider the methods used in physical sciences the only recommendable ones. Antinaturalists question this visionof the science. The article presents the main positions of the literature about naturalism v. antynaturalism dispute. The case is significant for the legal sciences, because its goal is to resolve the issue of scientific nature of jurisprudence and all humanities.

Keywords

PL

EN

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 23

Dates

published

2013

online

2013-05-17

Contributors

author

Mariusz Krawczyk

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/szn.2013.16.23.36