Neutralność światopoglądowa

• Authors: Arkadiusz Chrudzimski

Abstracts

EN

In this paper I focus on the concept of neutrality taken in the meaning typical for political discussions concerning e.g. the religious neutrality of the state. I take it for granted that the huge majority of educated people belonging to the so called “western culture” would agree that the most important institutions of our social life – such as schools, courts, and parliaments – should be neutral in this sense. But on the other hand it is extremely difficult to formulate a set of precise and reliable criteria allowing us to exclude particular statements, arguments or kinds of discourse as violating this principle of neutrality. The sad truth is that the term “neutrality”, even if restricted to the meaning that is relevant to this paper, is rather vague. Nevertheless I want to propose three types of criteria that can be helpful in attaining this goal. They will be termed: (i) content criterion, (ii) epistemic criterion, and (iii) pragmatic criterion. It seems that if we apply all these criteria together, we will be able to secure a reasonable degree of neutrality in our public debates.

Keywords

EN

neutrality; religion; argument; epistemic justification; pragmatic argument

PL

uzasadnienie epistemiczne; argumentacja; religia; neutralność; argument pragmatyczny

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
• Journal: Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 34
• Pages: 45-69

Contributors

author

Arkadiusz Chrudzimski

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Identifiers

DOI

10.18276/aie.2016.34-03

Biblioteka Nauki

1622127