The Trinitarian Processions

• Authors: R. T. Mullins

Title variants

PL

Trynitarne pochodzenia

Abstracts

PL

William Hasker i ja toczymy przyjacielski spór w kwestii doktryny Trójcy. Obaj odrzucamy atrybuty przyjmowane w ramach klasycznego teizmu, takie jak boska bezczasowość i boska prostota. W zamian przyjmujemy, że Bóg jest czasowy i zunifikowany. Ponadto, odrzucamy tzw. łacińskie modele Trójcy, preferując modele społeczne. Nie zgadzamy się natomiast w sprawie doktryny pochodzenia osób trynitarnych. W tym eseju przedstawiam niektóre problemy, przed jakimi staje doktryna pochodzenia.

EN

William Hasker and I have a friendly disagreement over the doctrine of the Trinity. We both reject classical theistic attributes like divine timelessness and divine simplicity. Instead, we affirm that God is temporal and unified. Further, we reject so-called Latin models of the Trinity, and prefer social models of the Trinity. Where we disagree is over the doctrine of the processions of the Trinitarian persons. In this essay, I articulate some problems for the doctrine of the processions.

Keywords

EN

Trinitarian processions; Trinity; eternal generation; subordinationism

PL

pochodzenie trynitarne; Trójca; wieczne generowanie; subordynacjonizm

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
• Journal: Roczniki Filozoficzne
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 71
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 33-57

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

R. T. Mullins

• University of Lucerne

• https://orcid.org/0000000336831263

References

• Anatolios, Khaled. 2011. Retrieving Nicaea: The Development and Meaning of Trinitarian Doctrine. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
• Ayres, Lewis. 2010. Augustine and the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Barnes, Michel R. 1993. “The Background and Use of Eunomius’ Causal Language.” In Arianism after Arius: Essays on the Development of the Fourth Century Trinitarian Conflicts, edited by Michel R. Barnes and Daniel H. Williams, 217–36. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
• Beeley, Christopher A. 2012. The Unity of Christ: Continuity and Conflict in Patristic Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Cameron, Ross P. 2009. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Properties.” In The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Robin Le Poidevin, Peter Simons, Andrew McGonigal, and Ross P. Cameron. New York: Routledge.
• Cary, Philip S. 2022. “Divine Causality According to Neoplatonism.” In Philosophical Essays on Divine Causation. New York: Routledge.
• Cleveland, Lindsay K. 2021. “Divine Aseity and Abstract Objects.” In T&T Clark Handbook of Analytic Theology, edited by James M. Arcadi and James T. Turner. London: T&T Clark.
• Correia, Fabrice. 2008. “Ontological Dependence.” Philosophy Compass 3:1013–32.
• Correia, Fabrice, and Benjamin Schnieder. 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Craig, William Lane. 2019. “Is God the Son Begotten in His Divine Nature?” TheoLogica 3 (1): 22–32.
• Cross, Richard. 2009. “Latin Trinitarianism: Some Conceptual and Historical Considerations.” In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity, edited by Thomas McCall and Michael C. Rea, 201–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cross, Richard. 2012. “Philosophy and the Trinity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy, edited by John Marenbon, 705–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cross, Richard. 2002. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Durand, Emmanuel. 2011. “A Theology of God the Father.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity, edited by Gilles Emery and Matthew Levering, 371–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Edwards, Mark. 2020. “Is Subordinationism a Heresy?” TheoLogica 4:1–18.
• Eunomius. 1987. Eunomius: The Extant Texts. Translated by Richard Paul Vaggione. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Fox, Rory. 2006. Time and Eternity in Mid-Thirteenth-Century Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gavrilyuk, Paul L. 2004. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Giles, Kevin N. 2012. The Eternal Generation of the Son: Maintaining Orthodoxy in Trinitarian Theology. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.
• Hasker, William. 2017. “God’s Only Begotten Son: A Reply to R.T. Mullins.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (4): 217–37.
• Hasker, William. 2013. Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Heron, Alasdair I. 1981. “Homoousios with the Father.” In The Incarnation: Ecumenical Studies in Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed A.D. 381, edited by Thomas F. Torrance, 58–87. Edinburgh: Handsel.
• Holmes, Stephen R. 2012. The Quest for the Trinity: The Doctrine of God in Scripture, History and Modernity. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.
• Lyman, Rebecca. 1993. “A Topography of Heresy: Mapping the Rhetorical Creation of Arianism.” In Arianism after Arius: Essays on the Development of the Fourth Century Trinitarian Conflicts, edited by Michel R. Barnes and Daniel H. Williams, 45–64. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
• Makin, Mark. 2018. “God from God: The Essential Dependence Model of Eternal Generation.” In “Metaphysics of the Trinity: New Directions.” Special issue, Religious Studies 54 (3), 377–94.
• McCall, Thomas. 2014. “Relational Trinity: Creedal Perspective.” In Two Views on the Doctrine of the Trinity, edited by Jason S. Sexton, Stephen R. Holmes, Paul D. Molnar, Thomas H. McCall, and Paul S. Fiddes, 101–3. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014.
• Mullins, R. T. 2016. “Divine Temporality, the Trinity, and the Charge of Arianism.” Journal of Analytic Theology 4:267–90.
• Mullins, R. T. 2017. “Hasker on the Divine Processions of the Trinitarian Persons.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9:181–216.
• Nagasawa, Yujin. 2017. Maximal God: A New Defense of Perfect Being Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Parvis, Sara. 2008. “Christology in the Early Arian Controversy: The Exegetical War.” In Christology and Scripture: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Andrew T. Lincoln and Angus Paddison, 120–37. London: T&T Clark.
• Pawl, Timothy. 2020. “Conciliar Trinitarianism, Divine Identity Claims, and Subordination.” TheoLogica 4:1–27.
• Pawl, Timothy. 2016. In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Peters, Ted. 1993. God as Trinity: Relationality and Temporality in Divine Life. Louisville: John Knox Press.
• Senor, Thomas D. 2013. “The Doctrine of the Trinity Is Coherent.” In Debating Christian Theism, edited by J. P. Moreland, Chad Meister, and Khaldoun A. Sweis, 335–46. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Sijuwade, Joshua R. Forthcoming. “Building the Monarchy of the Father.” Religious Studies.
• Webster, John. 2008. “Life in and of Himself: Reflections on God’s Aseity.” In Engaging the Doctrine of God: Contemporary Protestant Perspectives, edited by Bruce L. McCormack, 107–24. Edinburgh: Rutherford House.
• Yandell, Keith. 2009. “How Many Times Does Three Go Into One?” In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity, edited by Thomas H. McCall and Michael C. Rea, 151–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18290/rf237102.3

Biblioteka Nauki

31232809