Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 8 | 1 | 50-71

Article title

Political alignment and the allocation of the COVID-19 response funds-evidence from municipalities in Poland

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This paper aims to analyse the allocation of the COVID-19 response funds from the perspective of the political alignment hypothesis. eTh authors focus on the allocation of the second and third rounds of the Governmental Fund for Local Investments (part of the COVID-19 Response Fund) in Poland. Using the logit and OLS models and the regression discontinuity design the authors show that mayors aligned with the central government were significantly more likely to receive the funds, as well as in higher per capita values, than mayors aligned with the opposition or unaligned with any party in parliament when the allocation was based on a discretionary decision. eTh results support the political alignment hypothesis and highlight the danger of partiality in the allocation of the COVID-19 response funds.

Year

Volume

8

Issue

1

Pages

50-71

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

References

  • Ahmad, M. (2021). Intergovernmental transfers as tactical instrument: Empirical evidence from fourteen major Indian states. Journal of the Asia Pacicfi Economy, 26(4), 748-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2020.1840960
  • Aidt, T. S., Veiga, F. J., & Veiga, L. G. (2011). Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model. Public Choice, 148(1), 21-44.
  • Arulampalam, W., Dasgupta, S., Dhillon, A., & Dutta, B. (2009). Electoral goals and center-state transfers: A theoretical model and empirical evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.01.001
  • Banaszewska, M., & Bischo,f I. (2017). eTh political economy of EU-funds: Evidence from Poland. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, 237(3), 191-224. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2017-1105
  • Banaszewska, M., & Bischo,f I. (2020). Grants-in-aid and election outcomes in recipient jurisdictions: eTh impact of EU funds on mayoral elections in Poland. European Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101993
  • Berry, C. R., Burden, B. C., & Howell, W. G. (2010). eTh president and the distribution of federal spending. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 783-799. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0003055410000377
  • Bouvet, F., & Dall'erba, S. (2010). European regional structural funds: How large is the inuflence of politics on the allocation process?. Journal of Common Market Studies , 48(3), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02062.x
  • Brollo, F., & Nannicini, T. (2012). Tying your enemy's hands in close races: eTh politics of federal transfers in Brazil. American Political Science Review, 106(4), 742-761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000433
  • Calonico, M. D., Cattaneo, S., & Titiunik, R. (2015). rdrobust: An R package for Robust nonparametric inference in regression-discontinuity designs. R Journal, 7(1), 38-51.
  • Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2019). A practical introduction to regression discontinuity designs: Foundations. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684606
  • Clemens, J., & Veuger, S. (2021). Politics and the distribution of federal funds: Evidence from federal legislation in response to COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 204, 96‒117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104554
  • Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. ehT Journal of Politics, 48(2), 370-389.
  • Curto-Grau, M., Solé-Ollé, A., & Sorribas-Navarro, P. (2018). Does electoral competition curb party favoritism?. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(4), 378-407.
  • de la Cuesta, B., & Imai, K. (2016). Misunderstandings about the regression discontinuity design in the study of close elections. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 375-396.
  • Dellmuth, L. M., & Stoefl, M. F. (2012). Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: eTh local allocation of European Union structural funds. European Union Politics, 13(3), 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512440511
  • Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., & Weingast, B. (2006). Tragic brilliance: Equilibrium party hegemony in Mexico. (Working Paper Hoover Institution).
  • Eggers, A. C., & Hainmueller, J. (2009). MPs for sale? Returns to ocfie in postwar British politics. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 513-533.
  • Ferreira, J. L. D., Alves, A. F., & Caldeira, E. (2021). Grants for whom and why? eTh politics of allocation of transfers in Brazil. eTh Developing Economies , 59(1), 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12265
  • Flis, J., & Swianiewicz, P. (2021). Rządowy fundusz inwestycji lokalnych - reguły podziału. Retrieved from https://www.batory.org.pl
  • Galasso, V., & Nannicini, T. (2011). Competing on good politicians. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 79-99.
  • Gendźwiłł, A., & Żółtak, T. (2014). Why do non-partisans challenge parties in local politics? eTh (extreme) case of Poland. Europe-Asia Studies , 66(7), 1122-1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.927644
  • Golden, M. A., & Picci, L. (2008). Pork-barrel politics in postwar Italy, 1953-94. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 268-289.
  • Gramlich, E. M. (1977). Intergovernmental grants: A review of empirical literature. In: W. E. Oates (Ed.), eTh political economy of sfical federalism (pp. 219-240). Lexington: Lexington Books.
  • Grossman, P. J. (1994). A political theory of intergovernmental grants. Public Choice, 78(3/4), 295-303.
  • GUS. (2021). Statistics Poland. Retrieved from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start
  • Hanes, N. (2007). Temporary grant programmes in Sweden and central government behaviour. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1160-1174. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.03.005
  • Jacques, O., & Ferland, B. (2021). Distributive politics in Canada: eTh case of infrastructure spending in rural and suburban districts. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 54, 96-117. https://doi:org/10.1017/S0008423920000955
  • Jarocinska, E. (2022). Discretionary grants and distributive politics: Evidence from Spain. Comparative Economic Studies, 1‒29. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-022- 00186-3
  • Kauder, B., Potraefk, N., & Reischmann, M. (2016). Do politicians reward core supporters? Evidence from a discretionary grant program. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.09.003
  • Kleider, H., Röth, L., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2018). Ideological alignment and the distribution of public expenditures. West European Politics, 41(3), 779-802. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1395634
  • Lara, B. E., & Toro, S. M. (2019). Tactical distribution in local funding: eTh value of an aligned mayor. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 74-89. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.07.006
  • Lee, D. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 675-697.
  • Lee, D., Moretti, E, & Butler, M. (2004). Do voters aefct or elect policies? Evidence from the US House. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 807-859.
  • Levitt, S. D., & Snyder, J. M. J. (1995). Political parties and the distribution of federal outlays. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 958-980.
  • Lindbeck, A., & Weibull, J. W. (1987). Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice, 52(3), 273-297.
  • Migueis, M. (2013). eTh eefct of political alignment on transfers to Portuguese municipalities. Economics & Politics, 25(1), 110-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12005
  • Muraközy, B., & Telegdy, Á. (2016). Political incentives and state subsidy allocation: Evidence from Hungarian municipalities. European Economic Review, 89, 324‒344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.07.003
  • Musgrave, R. (1959). eTh theory of public nfiance: A study in public economics. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • PAP. (2021). Retrieved from https://samorzad.pap.pl/fundusz-inwestycji-lokalnych
  • PKW. (2018). Wybory samorządowe 2018. https://wybory2018.pkw.gov.pl/pl/index
  • Rahim, F., Allen, R., Barroy, H., Gores, L., & Kutzin, J. (2020). COVID-19 Funds in response to the pandemic. IMF Special Series on COVID-19.
  • Sakurai, S. N., & Menezes-Filho, A. N. (2008). Fiscal policy and re-election in Brazilian municipalities. Public Choice, 137, 301-314.
  • Solé-Ollé, A., & Sorribas-Navarro, P. (2008). eTh eefcts of partisan alignment on the allocation of intergovernmental transfers. Diefrences-in-diefrences estimates for Spain. Journal of Public Economics, 92(12), 2302-2319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpubeco.2007.06.014
  • Swianiewicz, P. (2020). Wpływ polityki partyjnej na rozdział dotacji celowych na przykładzie Funduszu Dróg Samorządowych. Wspólnota, 1, 44-53.
  • Sześciło, D., Gąsiorowska, A., Łapszyński, R., & Zakroczymski, S. (2020). Rządowy Fundusz Inwestycji Lokalnych: każdemu według potrzeb czy według barw politycznych?. Retrieved from www.batory.org.pl
  • Veiga, L. G. (2012). Determinants of the assignment of EU funds to Portuguese municipalities. Public Choice, 153(1-2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011- 9786-y

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2034005

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18559_ebr_2022_1_4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.