Stock returns and liquidity after listing switch on the Warsaw Stock Exchange

• Authors: Dorota Podedworna-Tarnowska , Daniel Kaszyński

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the article is to evaluate the market reaction to the change of listing venue of companies moving from the alternative market to the regulated market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange. To do so, we investigated 71 switches, and their effect on market returns and liquidity. While the transfer itself creates a negative market reaction, the announcement of the transfer of a company and the institutional confirmation by the supervision of the company’s readiness for this transfer resulting from the approval of the prospectus creates positive market reactions. As a result of the transfer of companies there is an improvement in the liquidity of the shares. The empirical findings of the study could assist managers and investors in understanding the impact of stock exchange migration on returns and the liquidity of shares in the shorter and longer term.

Keywords

EN

alternative market; main market; listing change; stock liquidity

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
• Journal: Economics and Business Review
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 111-135

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Dorota Podedworna-Tarnowska

• Institute of Value Management, Axiology and Value Measurement Unit, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, al. Niepodległości 162, 02-554 Warszawa, Poland

author

Daniel Kaszyński

• Institute of Econometrics, Decision Analysis and Support Unit, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, al. Niepodległości 162, 02-554 Warszawa, Poland

References

• Acharya V. V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 375-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnfieco.2004.06.007
• Ahmed, S., Aney, M. S., & Banerji, S. (2019). Migration of SMEs in the Bombay Stock Exchange: A diefrent look at the SME nfiancing issues . eTh International Growth Centre, Final Report.
• Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386- 4181(01)00024-6
• Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H. (1986), Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90065-6
• Amihud,Y., & Mendelson, H. (1991). Liquidity, asset prices and nfiancial policy. Financial Analysts Journal, 47(6), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v47.n6.56
• Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (2012). Liquidity, the value of the rfim, and corporate fi - nance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1745-6622.2012.00362.x
• Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Lauterbach, B. (1997). Market microstructure and securities values: Evidence from the Tel Aviv exchange. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 365-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00021-4
• Ang, A., Shtauber, A. A., & Tetlock, P. C. (2013). Asset pricing in the dark: eTh crosssection of OTC stocks. Review of Financial Studies, 26(12), 2985-3028. https://doi. org/10.1093/rfs/hht053
• Asyngier, R. (2013). Wprowadzanie akcji do obrotu na rynku NewConnect na tle głównych alternatywnych systemów obrotu w Europie. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H. Oeconomia, 47(2), 7-16.
• Asyngier, R. (2015). Wpływ zmiany rynku notowań na cenę akcji polskich spółek giełdowych. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 862(75), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2015.75-02
• Atkins, A. B., & Dyl, E. A. (1997). Transactions costs and holding periods for common stocks. Journal of Finance, 52, 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997. tb03817.x
• Aouadi, A., Arouri, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Information demand and stock market liquidity: International evidence. Economic Modelling, 70, 194-202. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.005
• Bacmann, J. F., Dubois, M., & Ertur, C. (2002). Valuation eefcts of listing on a more prominent segment of the stock market: Evidence from France. European Financial Management, 8(4), 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00200
• Bennett, P., & Wei, L. (2006). Market structure, fragmentation, and market quality. Journal of Financial Markets, 9(1), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfimar.2005.12.001
• Bessler, W., Beyenbach, J., Rapp M. S., & Vendrasco, M. (2021). eTh global nfiancial crisis and stock market migrations: An analysis of family and non-family rfims in Germany. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101692. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101692
• Bessler,W., Beyenbach, J., Rapp, M. S., & Vendrasco, M. (2022).Why do rfims down-list or exit from securities markets? Evidence from the German Stock Exchange. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00554-4
• Brennan, M. J., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1996). Market microstructure and asset pricing: On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00870-K
• Campbell, K., & Tabner, I. T. (2011). Bonding, rfim value and liquidity: An analysis of mi - grations between the AIM and the oficial list of the London Stock Exchange . https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1608403
• Dang, V. A., Michayluk, D., & Pham, T. P. (2018). eTh curious case of changes in trad - ing dynamics: When rfims switch from NYSE to NASDAQ. Journal of Financial Markets, 41, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfimar.2018.07.001
• De Carvalho,A. G., & Pennacchi, G. G. (2012). Can a stock exchange improve corporate behavior? Evidence from rfims' migration to premium listings in Brazil. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 883-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpnfi.2011.01.003
• Dharan, B. G., & Ikenberry, D. L. (1995). eTh long-run negative drift of post-listing stock returns. Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1547-1574. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329326
• Diamond, D.W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325-1359. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328861
• Doidge, C., Karolyi, G.A., & Stulz, R. M. (2017). eTh U.S. listing gap. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 464-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnfieco.2016.12.002
• Doman, M. (2011). Mikrostruktura giełd papierów wartościowych. Poznań:Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
• Engle, R. F., & Lange, J. (2001). Predicting VNET: A model of the dynamics of market depth. Journal of Financial Markets, 4(2), 113-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386- 4181(00)00019-7
• Goyenko, R.Y., Holden, C.W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2009). Do liquidity measures measure liquidity?. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jnfieco.2008.06.002
• Gurgul, H. (2006). Analiza zdarzeń na rynkach akcji. Wpływ informacji na ceny papierów wartościowych. Kraków: Ocfiyna Ekonomiczna.
• Hadro, D., & Pauka, M. (2019). Underpricing on the selected European alternative investment markets. e-Finanse, 15(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.2478/qfif-2019-0014
• He, J., Huang, H. H., & Zhang S. (2022). Correlation ambiguity, listing choice, and market microstructure. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 7(1), 61-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.08.003
• Jain, P. K., & Kim, J. (2006). Investor recognition, liquidity, and exchange listings in the reformed markets. Financial Management, 35(2), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1755-053X.2006.tb00140.x
• Jenkinson, T., & Ramadorai, T. (2013). Does one size tfi all? eTh consequences of switch - ing markets with diefrent regulatory standards. European Financial Management, 19, 852-886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2013.12021.x
• Kadlec, B. G., & McConnell, J. J. (1994). eTh eefct of market segmentation and illi - quidity on asset prices: Evidence from exchange listings. Journal of Finance, 49(2), 611-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb05154.x
• Karolyi, G. A., Lee, K. H., & van Dijk, M. A. (2012). Understanding commonality in liquidity around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 82-112. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jnfieco.2011.12.008
• Kedia, S., & Panchapagesan, V. (2011). Why do only some Nasdaq rfims switch to the NYSE? Evidence from corporate transactions. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfimar.2010.07.002
• Kordela, D. (2011). Przejścia z NewConnect na rynek regulowany GPW - nowy trend czy naturalna droga rozwoju spółki?. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 639(37), 473-482.
• Kordela, D. (2013). NewConnect - rynek giełdowy dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
• Kujawa, S., & Ostrowska, E. (2016). Analiza zdarzeń i jej zastosowanie w nfiansach be - hawioralnych. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 4(82/2), 191-200. https:// doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-15
• Kwok, J. K. H. (2020). Does switching trading venues create value? Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 27(2), 209-222. https://doi. org/10.1108/JABES-09-2019-0080
• Kyle,A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315- 1336. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210
• Le, H., & Gregoriou, A. (2020). How do you capture liquidity? A review of the literature on low-frequency stock liquidity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(5), 1170-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12385
• Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). eTh economic consequences of increased disclo - sure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91-124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672910
• Lizińska, J., & Czapiewski, L. (2014). Performance of Polish IPO rfims: Size and protfi - ability eefct. Gospodarka Narodowa, 1, 53-71. https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100877
• Lizińska, J., & Czapiewski, I. (2015). Determinanty underpricingu w Polsce i na innych rynkach wschodzących. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 386, 112-125.
• Ljungqvist, A. (2007). IPO underpricing. In: B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate nifance (pp. 375-422). North Holland: Elsevier.
• Lo, A., & Wang, J. (2000). Trading volume: Denfiitions, data analysis, and implica - tions of portfolio theory. Review of Financial Studies, 13(2), 257-300. https://doi. org/10.1093/rfs/13.2.257
• Lou, X., & Shu, T. (2017). Price impact or trading volume: Why is the Amihud (2002) measure priced?. Review of Financial Studies, 30(12), 4481-4520. https:// doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx072
• Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1997) eTh operating performance of rfims conduct - ing seasoned equity oefrings. Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1823-1850. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02743.x
• Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (2004). Why has IPO underpricing changed over time?. Financial Management, 3(4), 5-37.
• Ma, R., Anderson, H. D., and Marshall, B. R. (2016). International stock market liquidity: A review. Managerial Finance, 42(2), 118-135, doi:10.1108/MF-04-2015-0096
• Mizerka, J., & Lizińska J. (Eds.). (2017). Pierwsze oferty publiczne w Polsce i na świecie. Kontrowersje wokół anomalii rynkowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
• Mortazian, M. (2021). Liquidity and volatility of stocks moved from the main market to the Alternative Investment Market (AIM). Asia-Pacicfi Financial Markets , 29, 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-021-09344-6
• Muscarella, C., & Piwowar, M. (2001). Market microstructure and securities values: Evidence from the Paris Bourse. Journal of Financial Markets, 4(3), 209-229. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(00)00022-7
• Olbryś, J. (2103). Zastosowanie wybranych miar płynności aktywów kapitałowych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie S.A. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 11(3/2), 65-77.
• Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998).Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.25448
• Panfil, M. (2013).Analiza porównawcza NewConnect i innych europejskich rynków al - ternatywnego systemu obrotu akcjami. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 768(63), 347-368.
• Papaioannou, G. J., Travlos, N. G., & Viswanathan, K. G. (2003). eTh operating perfor - mance of rfims that switch their stock listings. Journal of Financial Research, 26(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.00069
• Papaioannou, G. J., Travlos, N. G., & Viswanathan, K. G. (2009). Visibility eefcts and timing in stock listing changes: Evidence from operating performance. eTh Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. qref.2007.09.007
• Park, J. H., Binh, K. B., & Eom, K. S. (2016). eTh eefct of listing switches from a growth market to a main board: An alternative perspective. Emerging Markets Review, 29, 246-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.006
• Pastusiak, R. (2011). Rynki alternatywne w Europie. Londyński Alternative Investment Market a NewConnect. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 174, 293-304.
• Perepeczo,A. (2010).Analiza zdarzenia i jej zastosowania. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 632(33), 35-51.
• Podedworna-Tarnowska, D. (2018). Niedowartościowanie w  procesie IPO spółek migrujących z rynku NewConnect na rynek główny Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 16(4/1), 151-163.
• Podedworna-Tarnowska, D. (2020). Niedowartościowanie spółek debiutujących na rynku głównym i alternatywnym Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. In P. Antonowicz, P. Galiński, P. Pisarewicz (Eds.), Perspektywa ekonomiczna, nfiansowa i prawna kreowania wartości w gospodarce (pp. 267-281). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
• Pomykalski, P., & Domagalski, M. (2015). IPO Underpricing and nfiancial analysts' forecast accuracy in Poland. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica, 1(310), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.09
• Radke, M. (2020). eTh position of NewConnect against the Alternative Markets of European countries. eTh impact of GDP on volatility in the indices and turnover value. Journal of Economics and Management, 40(2), 109-131. https://doi. org/10.22367/jem.2020.40.06
• Ritter, J. R. (1984). eTh “hot issue” market of 1980. eTh Journal of Business , 57(2), 215- 240. http://doi.org/10.1086/296260
• Sarr, A., & Lybek, T. (2002). Measuring liquidity in nfiancial markets . (IMF Working Paper, No. 02/232).
• Sanger, G. C., & McConnell, J. J. (1986). Stock exchange listings, rfim value, and security market ecfiiency: eTh impact of NASDAQ. ehT Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330987
• Sieradzki, R. (2016). Niedowartościowanie pierwotnych ofert publicznych na przykładzie akcji notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie.(Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska). Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie.
• Tomaszewski, J. (2012). Obowiązki informacyjne spółek notowanych na rynku NewConnect GPW S.A. w  świetle rozwiązań europejskich giełdowych platform ASO. Prace Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Gdańsku, 27, 115-127.
• Vismara, S., Paleari, S., & Ritter, J. (2012). Europe's second markets for small companies. European Financial Management, 18(3), 352-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 036X.2012.00641.x
• Welch, I., & Ritter, J. (2002).A review of IPO activity, pricing and allocations. eTh Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795-1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00478
• Włosik, K. (2017). Płynność przy wycenie akcji na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 79(2), 127-141. https:// doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2017.79.2.11
• Zarzecki, D., & Wołoszyn, A. (2013). eTh impact of the January eefct on the IPO un - derpricing in Poland. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 13(1), 121-135. https://doi. org/10.2478/foli-2013-0010
• Zarzecki, D., & Wołoszyn,A. (2016). eTh impact of value and growth companies on IPO underpricing on the Polish capital market. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 4(82), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-28
• Zhang, X. (2006). Information uncertainty and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 105-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00831.x
• Zygmanowski, P. (2017). Determinanty rozwoju rynku akcji NewConnect. Warszawa: CeDeWu.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18559/ebr.2022.4.6

Biblioteka Nauki

2153773