Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 6 | 2 | 107-120

Article title

Limiting meat consumption in the view of the students of the Poznań University of Economics and Business

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The aim of the study was to examine the attitudes of students at the Poznań University of Economics and Business towards limiting meat consumption, in the context of global trends related to sustainable development. The two main identified areas of consideration are related to the impact of excessive meat production and consumption on human health and the state of the environment. The survey involved 296 respondents (61.8% women, 37.8% men, 0.4% other). Throughout the study, it was found out that more than half (51.4%) of the respondents limit their meat consumption. The gender of the respondents was important in this regard (63.4% of women and 31.3% of men limit their meat consumption). The most frequently cited reasons for limiting meat consumption include concerns for the environment (42.6% of respondents) and the desire to improve health and well-being (41.9% of respondents). Meat consumption decisions among 30.7% of respondents are not influenced by any arguments.

Year

Volume

6

Issue

2

Pages

107-120

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Poznań University of Economics and Business
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business

References

  • Attenborough, D. (2021). Życie na naszej planecie. Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
  • Borusiak, B., & Kucharska, B. (2020). Opinie studentów na temat konsumpcji mięsa i jej konsekwencji dla środowiska naturalnego. Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review, 26(3), 53–64, https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.26.3.4
  • Burlingame, B., Dernini, S., Charrondiere, U., Stadlmayr, B., Mondovi, S., & Dop, M. (2010). Sustainable diets and biodiversity. Directions and solutions for policy, research and action. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
  • Cole, J. R., & McCoskey, S. (2013). Does global meat consumption follow an environmental Kuznets curve? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 9(2), 26–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2013.11908112
  • Creative Research System. (2012). Sample size calculator. https://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm
  • Dagevos, H., & Voordouw, J. (2013). Sustainability and meat consumption: is reduction realistic? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 9(2), 60–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2013.11908115
  • Descartes, R. (1981). Rozprawa o metodzie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • EAT-Lancet Commission. (2019). The planetary health diet. https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet-commission/the-planetary-health-diet-and-you/
  • European Commission. (2019). Reflection paper. Towards a sustainable Europe by 2030. European Commission.
  • Filip, M. (2021). PMR: Fleksitarian przybywa szybciej niż osób na diecie bezmięsnej. https://retailmarketexperts.com/dane-i-analizy/pmr-exclusive/pmr-fleksitarian-przybywa- szybciej-niz-osob-na-diecie-bezmiesnej/
  • Foer, J. S. (2013). Zjadanie zwierząt. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
  • Gates, B. (2021). Jak ocalić świat od katastrofy klimatycznej. Wydawnictwo Agora.
  • Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock. A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Grabowska, B. (2014). Zmiany relacji człowiek–zwierzę, czyli cena postępu. Kultura i Wartości, 2(10), 105–120, http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2014.10.105
  • Hickel, J. (2020). Less is more. How degrowth will save the world. Random House. Hoekstra, A., & Heek, M. (2017). Product gallery. https://www.waterfootprint.org/en/resources/interactive-tools/product-gallery/
  • Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth. Routledge.
  • Klein, N. (2018). Nie to za mało. Jak stawić opór polityce szoku i stworzyć świat, jakiego nam trzeba. Muza.
  • MacRae, J., O’Reilly, L., & Morgan, P. (2005). Desirable characteristics of animal products from a human health perspective. Livestock Production Science, 94(1–2), 95–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.030
  • Machovina, B., Feeley, K. J., & Ripple, W. J. (2015). Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption. Science of The Total Environment, (536), 419–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.022
  • Marinova, D., & Bogueva, D. (2019). Planetary health and reduction in meat consumption. Sustain Earth, 2(3), https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-019-0010-0
  • Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30 year update. Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
  • Migdał, W. (2007). Spożycie mięsa a choroby cywilizacyjne. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, 6(55), 48–61.
  • Milton, K. (2003). The critical role played by animal source foods in human (homo) evolution. The Journal of Nutrition, 133(11), 3886–3892, https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.11.3886S
  • Mroczek, K., Rudy, M., Stanisławczyk, R., & Mroczek, J. R. (2018). Produkcja i konsumpcja mięsa w aspekcie zrównoważonego rozwoju. Polish Journal for Sustainable Development, 22(2), 101–108, https://doi.org/10.15584/pjsd.2018.22.2.12
  • Neff, R., Edwards, D., Palmer, A., Ramsing, R., Righter, A., & Wolfson, J. (2018). Reducing meat consumption in the USA: A nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours. Public Health Nutrition, 21(10), 1835-1844. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1368980017004190
  • Our World in Data. (2022). Per capita meat consumption by type, 2019. https:// ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-meat-type
  • Petrovic, Z., Djordjevic, V., Milicevic, D., Nastasijevic, I., & Parunovic, N. (2015). Meat production and consumption: Environmental consequences. Procedia Food Science, (5), 235–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.09.041
  • Pica-Ciamarra, U., & Otte, J. (2009). The ‘Livestock Revolution’: Rhetoric and Reality. In P. Kristjanson, A. Krishna, M. Radeny, W. Nindo (Eds.), Pro-poor livestock policy initiatve (pp. 5–9). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • PKO Bank Polski. (2018). Branża mięsna. Wzrost znaczenia polskich producentów na świecie. https://wspieramyeksport.pl/api/public/files/1124/PKO_Bank_Polski_branza_miesna. pdf
  • Polska w liczbach. (2021). Polska – dane demograficzne. https://www.polskawliczbach.pl/ Plato. (2015). The Republic. Capstone Publishing.
  • Richi, E. B., Baumer, B., Conrad, B., Darioli, R., Schmid, A., & Keller, U. (2015). Health risks associated with meat consumption: A review of epidemiological studies. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 85(1–2), 70–78, https://doi. org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000224
  • Rogall, H. (2010). Ekonomia zrównoważonego rozwoju. Teoria i praktyka. Zysk i S-ka.
  • Rogelj, J., Shindell, D., Jiang, K., Fifita, S., Forster, P., Ginzburg, V., Handa, C., Kheshgi, H., Kobayashi, S., Kriegler, E., Mundaca, L., Séférian R., & Vilariño M. V. (2018). Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development. In V. Masson- Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma- Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (pp. 93–174). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.004
  • Sanderson, B. M., & O’Neill, B. C. (2020). Assessing the costs of historical inaction on climate change. Scientific Reports, (10), 9173, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66275-4
  • Schroeder, J., Bartosik-Purgat, M., & Mruk, H. (2013). Międzynarodowe badania marketingowe. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
  • Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2012). Etyka a to, co jemy. Wydawnictwo Czarna Owca.
  • Steel, C. (2021). Sitopia. Jak jedzenie może ocalić świat. Wydawnictwo Wysoki Zamek. Tomasz z Akwinu, św. (1985). Suma teologiczna. Katolicki Ośrodek Wydawniczy „Versitas”.
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu. (2021). Sprawozdanie Rektora Uniwersytetu
  • Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu za rok akademicki 2020/2021. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu.
  • World Cancer Research Fund. (2021). Limit red and processed meat. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/limit-red-and-processed-meat/
  • World Health Organisation. (2015). Cancer: Carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat
  • World Wide Fund for Nature. (2021). Effects of climate change. https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/effects-of-climate-change

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2207114

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18559_ref_2022_2_6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.