The Destruction of Legal Reason: Lessons from the Past

• Authors: Cosmin Cercel
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The legal predicament of today in Europe and beyond takes the form of a devaluation of the meaning of legality, constitutionality and, of the rule of law. What we are dealing with is yet another crisis of both the tradition of the Rechtsstaat in continental setting and, more broadly, of liberal legality. While this disruption within the sphere of the law seems to mirror the reshuffling in established politics that took place over the last twenty years, it traces back to central jurisprudential questions that have made the substance of crucial debates during the interwar and have fashioned both the field of constitutional theory of the continent and our jurisprudential apparatus for approaching the nexus between law and politics. In this article I argue that the apparent uchronia that the current status of the law opens in relation to past theoretical questions that were seeking to ground legality, is neither a simple by-product of a Zeigeist oversaturated by appeals to procedural democracy or for returns to sovereign power, nor a mere regression to past juridico-political settings. It is a historical development that has been dormant for the past decades, yet has slowly undermined legal thought and praxis. Revisiting, as a matter of historical and jurisprudential inquiry, the context and the content of this original opposition between liberal legality and its enemy, is a way of understanding what constructs our own contemporary situation.

Keywords

EN

authoritarianism; interwar; legal history; legal theory; liberal legality; rule of law

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 89
• Pages: 15-30

Dates

published

2019-12-29

Contributors

author

Cosmin Cercel

• University of Nottingham, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, School of Law

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-0568

References

• Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Arendt, Hannah. 1985 [1951]. Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Books & Harcourt.
• Arvidsson, Matilda. Leila Brännström. Panu Minkkinen. 2016. The Contemporary Relevance of Carl Schmitt: Law, Politics, Theology. London: Routledge.
• Asp, Petter. 2013. “Preventionism and Criminalization of Nonconsummate Offences”. In Prevention and the Limits of Criminal Law. 23–46. Edited by Andrew Ashworth, Lucia Zedner, Patrick Tomlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Barbu, Daniel. 1998. Republica absentă. Bucharest: Nemira.
• Belavusau, Uladzislau. Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias. 2017. “Introduction: Memory Laws: Mapping a New Subject in Comparative Law and Transitional Justice”. In Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. 1–26. Edited by Uladzislau Belavusau, Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Benjamin, Walter. 1969 [1936]. “The Storyteller”. In Illuminations. 83–110. Edited by Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.
• Cercel, Cosmin. 2017. Towards a Jurisprudence of State Communism. London: Routledge.
• Cistelecan, Alex. 2015. “From Region to Culture, from Culture to Class”. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 25: 45–60.
• Copjec, Joan. 1991. “Vampires, Breast-Feeding, and Anxiety”. October 58: 22–45.
• Czarnota, Adam. Martin Krygier. Wojciech Sadurski. 2005. “Introduction”. In Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism. 1–8. Edited by Adam Czarnota, Martin Krygier, Wojciech Sadurski. Budapest: Central European University Press.
• Damșa, Liviu. 2016. The Transformation of Property Regimes and Transitional Justice in Central Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Springer.
• Dardot, Pierre. Christian Laval. 2013. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London: Verso.
• Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Force de loi. Paris: Galilée.
• Douzinas, Costas. 2014. “A Short History of the British Critical Legal Conference or, the Responsibility of the Critic”. Law and Critique 25: 187–198.
• Dyzenhaus, David. 2013. “Preventive Justice and the Rule of Law Project”. In Prevention and the Limits of Criminal Law. 91–114. Edited by Andrew Ashworth, Lucia Zedner, Patrick Tomlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ewald, François. 1990. “Norms, Discipline and the Law”. Representations 30: 138–161.
• Eyal, Gill. Ivan Szelenyi. Eleanor Townsley. 2001. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists. The New Ruling Elites in Eastern Europe. London: Verso.
• Felman, Shoshana. 2002. The Juridical Unconscious. Trials and Traumas in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.
• Fraser, David. 1987. “The Day The Music Died. The Civil Law Tradition from a Critical Legal Studies Perspective”. Loyola Law Review 32: 861–880.
• Fraser, David. 2005. Law after Auschwitz: Towards a Jurisprudence of the Holocaust. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
• Fraser, David. 2011. “Shadows of Law, Shadows of Shoah: Towards a Legal Theory of the Nazi Killing Machine”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32: 401–419.
• Fuller, Lon Luvois. 1958. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart”. Harvard Law Review 71: 630–672.
• Girard, René. 1977. “Violence and Representation in the Mythical Text”. Comparative Literature 92: 922–944.
• Goodrich, Peter. 1983. “The Rise of Legal Formalism; or the Defenses of Legal Faith”. Legal Studies 3: 248–266.
• Guga, Ștefan. 2014. “Criza ca oportunitate: schimbarea legislației muncii și înfrângerea mișcării sindicale”. In Epoca Traian Băsescu: România între 2004 și 2014. 103–116. Edited by Florin Poenaru, Costi Rogozanu. Bucharest: Tact.
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1993. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
• Habermas, Jürgen. William Rehg. 2001. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles”. Political Philosophy 29: 766–781.
• Halmai, Gábor. 2019. “Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism”. German Law Journal 20: 296–313.
• Harel, Alon. 2014. Why Law Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hart, Herbert L. A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals”. Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629.
• Hesselink, Martijn W. 2002. “The New European Legal Culture”. In The New European Private Law. 11–75. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
• Hunt, Alan. 1985. “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law”. Law and Society Review 19: 11–37.
• Ionesco, Eugène. 1959. Rhinocéros: pièce en trois actes et quatre tableaux. Paris: Gallimard.
• Ionesco, Eugène. 1966. Notes et contre-notes. Paris: Gallimard.
• Jacobson, Arthur J. Bernard Schlink. Eds. 2000. Weimar – a Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Joerges, Christian. Navraj Singh Ghaleigh. Eds. 2003. Darker Legacies of Law in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
• Kelsen, Hans. 1955. “Foundations of Democracy”. Ethics 66: 1–101.
• Kelsen, Hans. 1992 [1934]. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Könczöl, Miklós. 2017. “Dealing with the Past in and around the Fundamental Law of Hungary”. In Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. 246–262. Edited by Uladzislau Belavusau, Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Krygier, Martin. 1990. “Marxism and the Rule of Law: Reflections After the Collapse of Communism”. Law and Social Inquiry 15: 633–663.
• Lacan, Jacques. 1966. “L’instance de la lettre dans l’inconscient ou la raison depuis Freud”. In Écrits. Vol. 1. 493–528. Paris: Le Seuil.
• Lacan, Jacques. 1974. “Le séminaire. Livre XXII. RSI. La scéance du 17 décembre 1974”. Ornicar? 2: 87–97.
• Lacan, Jacques. 1975. Le séminaire: livre XX: Encore. Paris: Le Seuil.
• Lacan, Jacques. 1991 [1970]. Le séminaire: livre XVII: L’envers de la psychanalyse. Paris: Le Seuil.
• Landau, David. 2018. “Populist Constitutionalism”. Chicago Law Review 85: 521–544.
• Losurdo, Domenico. 2015 [1996]. War and Revolution: Rethinking the Twentieth Century. London: Verso.
• Luhmann, Niklas. 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mangabeira Unger, Roberto. 1986. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Mańko, Rafał. 2013. “Weeds in the Garden of Justice. The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome”. Polemos: Journal of Law, Literature and Culture 7(2): 207–233.
• Mańko, Rafał. 2015. “Reality Is For Those Who Cannot Sustain the Dream: Fantasies of Selfhood in Legal Texts”. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 5(1): 24–47.
• McCormick, John P. 1997. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Ost, François. Michel Van de Kerchove. 2002. De la pyramide au réseau? Bruxelles: Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis.
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2016. “Flesh of the Law: Material Metaphors”. Journal of Law and Society 43: 45–65.
• Platt, Gerald M. 1998. “An Alternative Theory”. In International Fascism. 204–215. Edited by Roger Griffin. London: Arnold.
• Poenaru, Florin. 2017. Locuri Comune: clasă, anticomunism, stânga. Bucharest: Tact.
• Poenaru, Florin. Costi Rogozanu. 2014. Epoca Traian Băsescu: România între 2004 și 2014. Bucharest: Tact.
• Ricoeur, Paul. 1995. Le juste. Paris: Esprit.
• Rosenfeld, Michel. 2010. The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture, and Community. London: Routledge.
• Sadurski, Wojciech. 2005. “Transitional Constitutionalism: Simplistic and Fancy Theories”. In Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism. 9–27. Edited by Adam Czarnota, Martin Krygier, Wojciech Sadurski. Budapest: Central European University Press.
• Sadurski, Wojciech. 2019. Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sajó, András. Renáta Uitz. 2017. The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism”. University of Chicago Law Review 85: 545–583.
• Scheuerman, William E. 1999. Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. New York: Rowmann and Littlefield.
• Schmitt, Carl. 1985 [1922]. Political Theology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Schmitt, Carl. 2008 [1928]. Constitutional Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Schütz, Anton. 2000. “Thinking the Law With and Against Luhmann, Legendre, Agamben”. Law and Critique 11: 107–136.
• Schütz, Anton. 2008. “The Fading Memory of Homo non Sacer”. In The Work of Giorgio Agamben. Law, Literature, Life. 114–131. Edited by Justin Clemens, Nicholas Heron, Alex Murray. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Skinner, Stephen. 2011. “The Right to Life, Democracy and State Responsibility in ‘Urban Guerilla’ Conflict: the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber Judgment in Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy”. Human Rights Law Review 11: 567–577.
• Skinner, Stephen. Ed. 2015. Fascism and Criminal Law: History, Theory, Continuity. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
• Skinner, Stephen. Ed. 2019a. Ideology and Criminal Law: Fascist, National Socialist and Authoritarian Regimes. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
• Skinner, Stephen. 2019b. Lethal Force, the Right to Life and the ECHR: Narratives of Death and Democracy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
• Stone, Dan. 2014. Goodbye to All That: A History of Europe since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sulikowski, Adam. 2016. “Government of Judges and Neoliberal Ideology: The Polish Case”. In Law and Critique in Central and Eastern Europe. 16–31. Edited by Rafał Mańko, Cosmin Cercel, Adam Sulikowski. Oxford: Counterpress.
• Tacik, Przemysław. 2019. “A New Popular Front, or, on the Role of Critical Jurisprudence under Neo-Authoritarianism in Central-Eastern Europe”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 89.
• Teitel, Ruti. 2002. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Traverso, Enzo. 2019. The New Faces of Fascism. London: Verso.
• Trif, Aurora. 2013. “Romania: collective bargaining institutions under attack”. Transfer: European Review of Labour Research 19(2): 227–237.
• Varol, Ozan O. 2015. “Stealth Authoritarianism”. Iowa Law Review 100: 1673–1742.
• Vinx, Lars. 2015. The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weiler, Joseph H. H., Marlene Wind. 2003. European Constitutionalism Beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Žižek, Slavoj. 1993. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel and the Critique of Ideology. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Žižek, Slavoj. 2001. Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism? London: Verso.
• Žižek, Slavoj. 2002. Welcome to the Desert of the Real. London: Verso.
• Žižek, Slavoj. 2008 [1989]. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
• Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. The Year of Dreaming Dangerously. London: Verso.
• Decree 1475/2015. Decree No. 1475 of 14 November 2015 concerning the application of Statute 55–883 of 3 April 1955. Journal officiel de la République française No. 264, 14 November 2015, p. 21297.
• Statute 1501/2015. Statute No. 1501 of 20 November 2015 extending the application of the Statute 55–883 of 3 April 1955 on the state of emergency and reinforcing the efficacy of its provisions. Journal officiel de la République française No. 271, 21 November 2015, p. 21665.
• Proclamation 9844/2019. Proclamation 9844 of 15 February 2019 Declaring a a National Emergency Concerning the Southern Border of the United States. 84 Federal Register No. 34, 20 February 2019.
• Miller 1. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5.
• Miller 2. R (Miller) v Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/0208-6069.89.02