Citizen involvement in waste management and circular economy in cities: Key elements for planning and implementation

• Authors: Olga Izdebska , Jörg Knieling
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper identifies and explores key elements for planning and implementing citizen involvement in the area of waste management and circular economy in cities. The analysis has shown that institutions responsible for waste management regard strategic planning, inclusivity, transparency, continuity, and resources as particularly important for reaching the objectives of citizen involvement. However, not all of the four analysed cities have applied these elements to the same extent, due to e.g. a lack of a strategy for citizen involvement, or limited personal and financial resources.

Keywords

EN

circular economy; circular city; waste management; citizen involvement; collaborative governance

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: European Spatial Research and Policy
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 115-129

Dates

published

2020-12-30

Contributors

author

Olga Izdebska

• HafenCity University Hamburg, Überseeallee 16, 20457 Hamburg, Germany

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-8616

author

Jörg Knieling

• HafenCity University Hamburg, Überseeallee 16, 20457 Hamburg, Germany

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-5458

References

• AJZEN, I. (1991), ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), pp. 179–211.
• AMIU (AZIENDA MULTISERVIZI E D’IGIENE URBANA) (2018), Business Plan 2018–2020 [Piano Industriale 2018–2020].
• ANSELL, C. and GASH, A. (2008), ‘Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), pp. 543–571.
• ARNSTEIN, S.R. (1969), ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35 (4), pp. 216–224.
• BARR, S., GUILBERT, S., METCALFE, A., RILEY, M., ROBINSON, G.M. and TUDOR, T.L. (2013), ‘Beyond recycling: An integrated approach for understanding municipal waste management’, Applied Geography, 39, pp. 67–77.
• BEHÖRDE FÜR UMWELT UND ENERGIE (2018), Abfallstatistik 2017: Siedlungsabfälle, https://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/11362522/efad41bd4c34a3c09d7ade2a8ba4ca2c/data/d-statis-tik-siedlungsabfall-2017.pdf [accessed on: 01.04.2019]
• BERNSTAD, A. (2014), ‘Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience’, Waste Management, 34 (7), pp. 1317–1323.
• BICKERSTAFF, K. and WALKER, G. (2001), ‘Participatory Local Governance and Transport Planning’, Environment and Planning, 33 (3), pp. 431–451.
• BORTOLETO, A.P., KURISU, K.H. and HANAKI, K. (2012), ‘Model development for household waste prevention behaviour’, Waste Management, 32 (12), pp. 2195–2207.
• BUNDESMINISTERIUM FÜR VERKEHR UND DIGITALE INFRASTRUKTUR (2014), Handbuch für eine gute Bürgerbeteiligung. Planung von Großvorhaben im Verkehrssektor, Berlin, https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Publikationen/G/handbuch-buergerbeteiligung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile [accessed on: 16.12.2019]
• BUTTERISS, C. (2016), ‘What is community engagement, exactly?’, Bang the Table, web log post 10 July, https://www.bangthetable.com/blog/defining-community-engagement [accessed on: 21.03.2019]
• CHAKRABORTY, S. and STRATTON, R. (1993), ‘An integrated regional approach to risk management of industrial systems’, Nuclear Safety, 34 (1), pp. 1–8.
• CORNWALL, A. (2006), ‘Historical perspectives on participation in development’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 44 (1), pp. 62–83.
• COPENHAGEN CLEANTECH CLUSTER (2012) Denmark: we know waste, Copenhagen.
• CSOBOD, É., GRÄTZ, M. and SZUPPINGER, P. (2009). Overview and Analysis of Public Awareness Raising Strategies and Actions on Energy Savings, Report no. INTENSE/Deliverable 6.1/ WP6/Year 2009, http://www.intense-energy.eu/uploads/tx_triedownloads/INTENSE_WP6_D61_final.pdf [accessed on: 16.12.2019]
• DESA, A., KADIR, N.B.Y.A. and YUSOOFF, F. (2011), ‘A Study on the Knowledge, Attitudes, Awareness Status and Behaviour Concerning Solid Waste Management’, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, pp. 643–648.
• EMERSON, K., NABATCHI, T. and BALOGH, S. (2012), ‘An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22 (1), pp. 1–29.
• EMERSON, K. and NABATCHI, T. (2015), ‘Collaborative governance regimes’, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2020), Circular Economy, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sus-tainability/circular-economy_en [accessed on: 28.06.2020]
• EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY (2016), Municipal Waste Management. Country Factsheet – Portugal.
• EVISON, T. and READ, A.D. (2001). ‘Local Authority recycling and waste – awareness publicity/promotion’, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 32 (3–4), pp. 275–291.
• FORESTER, J. (2008), ‘Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations’, Journal of American Planning Association, 72 (4), pp. 447–456.
• FREY, B.S. and OBERHOLZER-GEE, F. (1997), ‘The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out’, The American Economic Review, 87 (4), pp. 746–755.
• GLASS, J.J. (1979), ‘Citizen Participation in Planning: The Relationship Between Objectives and Techniques’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45 (2), pp. 180–189.
• GRODZINSKA-JURCZAK, M., BARTOSIEWICZ, A., TWARDOWSKA, A. and BALLANTYNE, R. (2003), ‘Evaluating the Impact of a School Waste Education Programme upon Students’, Parents’ and Teachers’ Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour’, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12 (2), pp. 106–122.
• HAGE, O., SANDBERG, K., SÖDERHOLM, P. and BERGLUND, C. (2008), ‘Household Plastic Waste Collection in Swedish Municipalities: A Spatial-Econometric Approach’, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Annual Conference: 25–28.06.2008, pp. 1–30.
• INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION [IAP2] (2014), IAP2’s Public Participation Spectrum, https://www.iap2.org.au/Tenant/C0000004/00000001/files/IAP2_Public_Participation_Spectrum.pdf [accessed on: 16.12.2019]
• JÄCKEL, K., FODOR, M. and PAPP, J. (2015), ‘Environment conscious consumers’ opinion on selective waste management’, Journal of Contemporary Economic and Business Issues, 2 (2), pp. 5–22.
• JOSHI, A., KALE, S., CHANDEL, S. and PAL, D.K. (2015), ‘Likert Scale: Explored and Explained’, British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7 (4), pp. 396–403.
• MAIBACH, E. (1993), ‘Social marketing for the environment: using information campaigns to promote environmental awareness and behavior change’, Health Promotion International, 8 (3), pp. 209–224.
• MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY [Behörde für Umwelt und Energie] (2017), Municipal Waste Management Plan [Abfallwirtschaftsplan Siedlungsabfälle], Hamburg: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg.
• MEE, N. and CLEWES, D. (2004), ‘The influence of corporate communications on recycling behaviour’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 9 (4), pp. 265–275.
• MERRIAM-WEBSTER (2019), ‘Continuity’, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/continuity [accessed on: 16.12.2019]
• MERRIAM-WEBSTER (2019), ‘Network’. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/network [accessed on: 14.12.2019]
• PETTS, J. (2001), ‘Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: Waste Management Case-studies’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44 (2), pp. 207–226.
• REAMS, M.A. and RAY, B.H. (1993), ‘The effects of three prompting methods on recycling participation rates: a field study’, Journal Environmental Systems, 22 (4), pp. 371–379.
• ROGERS, E. and STOREY, J. (1987), ‘Communication Campaigns’, [in:] BERGER, C. and CHAFFEE, S. (eds.), Handbook of communication science, California, Sage, pp. 817–846.
• ROWE, G. and FREWER, L.J. (2000), ‘Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25 (1), pp. 3–29.
• ROWE, G. and FREWER, L.J. (2005). ‘A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 30 (2), pp. 251–290.
• SCHWARTZ, S.H. (1977), ‘Normative Influences on Altruism’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, pp. 221–279.
• SETTI, M., BLANCHELLI, F., FALASCONI, L., SEGRÈ, A. and VITTUARI, M. (2018), ‘Consumers’ food cycle and household waste. When behaviors matter’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, pp. 694–706.
• SHARP, V., GIORGI, S. and WILSON, D.C. (2010), ‘Delivery and impact of household waste prevention campaigns (at the local level)’, Waste Management and Research, 28 (3), pp. 256–268.
• SMITH, L. (1993), Impact assessment and sustainable resource management, Harlow: Longman.
• STERN, P.C. (1999), ‘Information, Incentives, and Proenvironmental Consumer Behaviour’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 22 (4), pp. 461–478.
• STERN, P.C. (2000), ‘Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behaviour’, Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), pp. 407–424.
• THØGERSEN, J. (2003), ‘Monetary Incentives and Recycling: Behavioural and Psychological Reactions to a Performance-Dependent Garbage Fee’., Journal of Consumer Policy, 26 (2), pp. 197–228.
• TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (2019), Anti-Corruption Glossary: Transparency, https://www.transparency.org/glossary/term/transparency [accessed on: 14.12.2019]
• UN HABITAT (2010), Solid Waste Management in the World’s Cities. Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities 2010, Earthscan, London, UK.
• WANG, Z., GUO, D., WANG, X., ZHANG, B. and WANG, B. (2018), ‘How does information publicity influence residents’ behaviour intentions around e-waste recycling?’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, pp. 1–9.
• WEBLER, T. (1995), ‘“Right” discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick’, [in:] RENN, O., WEBLER, T. and WIEDEMANN, P. (eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 35–86.
• WRAP (THE WASTE AND RESOURCES ACTION PROGRAMME) (2010), Improving the performance of waste diversion schemes – A good practice guide to monitoring and evaluation, Banbury: WRAP Project.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1231-1952.27.2.08