Urban regeneration and urban resilience planning through connectivity: the importance of this principle of new urbanism

• Authors: Monika Cysek-Pawlak , Sylwia Krzysztofik , Andrzej Makowski

Abstracts

EN

Urban regeneration, which is increasingly having to include methods of adapting urban areas to escalating climate change, is one of the main challenges for the contemporary development of European cities, especially in densely built-up central areas. This multi-level process requires major financial outlays, which is why it is so important to identify the factors that ensure the effectiveness of implemented projects. This article attempts to define the meaning of the New Urbanism principle of connectivity, ensuring freedom of movement in the urban regeneration process. The conducted research has been intended to verify the hypothesis that improving connectivity is critical for the success of the processes of regenerating and improving resilience in degraded urban fabric. The research was conducted using the area regeneration of the centre of Lodz as an example, being the largest project of this type in Poland. The analyses were made by comparing the current status, based on an inventory of the existing situation, and the planned status on the basis of design documentation. The research demonstrates that increasing connectivity will improve the accessibility of properties located within municipal quarters and will help obtain more attractive public spaces. The planned activities will also help bolster climate change in the location by increasing green areas, improving the use of wasteland, and by developing a network of green infrastructure. The execution of the revitalisation project in the centre of Lodz will not only improve the quality of space, but will also increase the resilience of the intensively urbanised inner-city areas to climate change.

Keywords

EN

Lodz; New Urbanism; resilience; urban regeneration

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: European Spatial Research and Policy
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 29
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 111-133

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Monika Cysek-Pawlak

• Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering Architecture and Environmental Engineering, al. Politechniki 6, 93-590 Łódź, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000281756779

author

Sylwia Krzysztofik

• Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering Architecture and Environmental Engineering, al. Politechniki 6, 93-590 Łódź, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000290530042

author

Andrzej Makowski

• Municipal Urban Planning Studio in Lodz, al. Kościuszki 19, 90-418 Łódź, Poland

• https://orcid.org/000000034681562X

References

• AGHAABBASI, M., MOEINADDINI, M., ASADI-SHEKARI, Z. and ZALY SHAH, M. (2019), ‘The equitable use concept in sidewalk design’, Cities, 88, pp. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.010
• ALFONZO, M. A. (2005), ‘To Walk or Not to Walk? The Hierarchy of Walking Needs’, Environment and Behavior, 37 (6), pp. 808–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274016
• BERN, B. and MARSHALL, W. E. (2013), ‘Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian Treatments at Large Arterial Intersections & Comparison with Lane-Equivalent, Small Intersection Gridded Networks’, ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 139 (4), pp. 241–249.
• BOCAREJO, J. P. (2012), ‘Transport accessibility and social inequities: A tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments’, Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp. 142–154.
• BOHL, C. C. (2000), ‘New Urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighbourhoods’, Housing Policy Debate, 11 (4), pp. 761–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521387
• CALTHORPE, P. (1993), The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
• CARPIO-PINEDO, J., BENITO-MORENO, M. and LAMÍQUIZ-DAUDÉN, P. J. (2021), ‘Beyond land use mix, walkable trips. An approach based on parcel-level land use data and network analysis’, Journal of Maps, 17 (1), pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1875063
• CARPIO-PINEDO, J., DE GREGORIO HURTADO, S. and SÁNCHEZ DE MADARIAGA, I. (2019), ‘Gender mainstreaming in urban planning: the potential of Geographic Information Systems and open data sources’, Planning Theory & Practice, 20 (2), pp. 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1598567
• CERVERO, R. and GORHAM, R. (1995), ‘Commuting in transit versus automobile neighbourhoods’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 61 (2), pp. 210–225.
• Cities of the future, challenges, visions, perspectives, European Union Regional Policy, 2011.
• Climate change adaptation plan for the city of Lodz, Lodz, UMŁ (2018), https://uml.lodz.pl/ekoportal/eko-wiedza/miasto/miejski-plan-adaptacji-do-zmian-klimatu/ [accessed on: 30.09.2020].
• CNU – Congress of the New Urbanism (2000), Charter of the New Urbanism, http://www.cnu.org [accessed on: 23.01.2018].
• CYSEK-PAWLAK, M. M. and KRZYSZTOFIK, S. (2018), ‘The New Urbanism principle of quality architecture and urban design versus place identity. A case study of Val d’Europe and the Manufaktura complex’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 25 (2), pp. 99–115. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.2.06
• CYSEK-PAWLAK, M. M. and PABICH, M. (2020), ‘Walkability – the New Urbanism principle for urban regeneration’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1834435
• DESOUZA, K. C. and FLANERY, T. H. (2013), ‘Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework’, Cities, 35, p. 89.
• DIXON, J. and DUPUIS, A. (2003), ‘Urban Intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: A Challenge for New Urbanism’, Housing Studies, 18 (3), pp. 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030304239
• DROBNIAK, A. (2014), Urban resilience concept and post-industrial cities in Europe, Katowice.
• DUANY, A. and PLATER‐ZYBERK, E. (1992), ‘The second coming of the American small town’, Wilson Quarterly, 16.
• DUANY, A. and PLATER‐ZYBERK, E. (1994), ‘The neighbourhood, the district and the quarter’, [in:] KATZ, R. (ed.) The New Urbanism, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• DUTTON, J. A. (2000), New American urbanism: reforming the suburban metropolis, Milano: Skira Architecture Library.
• DWORNICZAK, Ł. and REDA, P. (2019), Standardy kształtowania zieleni w Łodzi (Green shaping standards in Łódź), Order No. 8378/VIII/21 of the mayor of Łódź, dated 24 September 2021 on shaping, maintaining and protecting the green areas of Łódź.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021), Forging a climate resilient Europe – The new EU strategy on adaptation to climate change (COM/2021/82 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A82%3AFIN
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION & EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (2022), Climate – ADAPT strategy 2022–2024. Sharing knowledge for a climate-resilient Europe, https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/about/climate-adapt-strategy-2022-2024-final.pdf
• EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (2016), Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe 2016: Transforming cities in a changing climate (EEA Report No. 12/2016). https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-adaptation-2016
• GIRLING, C., ZHENG, K., MONTI, A. and EBNESHAHIDI, M. (2019), ‘Walkability vs. walking: assessing outcomes of walkability at Southeast False Creek, Vancouver, Canada’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8 (2), pp. 456–475.
• GUGIK – Główny Urząd Geodezji i Kartografii – The Head Officeof Geodesy and Cartography, https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html [accessed on: 07.12.2020].
• GUS – Główny Urząd Statystyczny – Statistics Poland, Local Data Bank, https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start [accessed on: 25.11.2020].
• HANDY, S., PATERSON, R. and BUTLER, K. (2003), ‘Planning for Street Connectivity: Getting from Here to There’, Planning Advisory Service, Report 515, American Planning Association.
• HANZL, M., TOFILUK, A., ZINOWIEC-CIEPLIK, K., GROCHULSKA-SALAK, M. and NOWAK, A. (2021), ‘The Role of Vegetation in Climate Adaptability: Case Studies of Lodz and Warsaw’, Urban Planning 6 (4), pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.3931
• HIGGS, G., FRY, R. and LANGFORD, M. (2012), ‘Investigating the Implications of Using Alternative GIS-Based Techniques to Measure Accessibility to Green Space’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39 (2), pp. 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1068/b37130
• HUDSON, R., (2010), ‘Resilient regions in an uncertain world: wishful thinking or a practical reality?’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3 (1), pp. 11–25.
• JACKSON, A. (2018), ‘Barriers to Integrating New Urbanism in Mixed-Income Housing Plans in Chicago: Developer, Housing Official, and Consultant Perspectives’, Housing Policy Debate, 28 (5), pp. 695–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1433703
• JOH, K., BOARNET, M. G., NGUYEN, M. T., FULTON, W., SIEMBAB, W. and WEAVER, S. (2008), ‘Accessibility, travel behavior, and new urbanism: Case study of mixed-use centers and auto-oriented corridors in the South Bay region of Los Angeles, California’, Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2082, pp. 81–89.
• KACZMAREK, S., (2001), Rewitalizacja terenów poprzemysłowych. Nowy wymiar w rozwoju miast, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, p. 9.
• KATZ, R.(1994), The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, New York: McGraw Hill.
• KHATTAK, A. J. and RODRIGUEZ, D. (2005), ‘Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39 (6), pp. 481–500.
• KNAAP, G.-J., SONG, Y., EWING, R. and CLIFTON, K. (2005), ‘Seeing the Elephant: Multi-Disciplinary Measures of Urban Sprawl’, Urban Studies and Planning Program, University of Maryland.
• KNIGHT, P. L. and MARSHALL, W. E. (2015), ‘The metrics of street network connectivity: their inconsistencies’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8 (3), pp. 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909515
• LA ROSA, D. (2014), ‘Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context’, Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.011
• LEVINE, J. (1998), ‘Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64 (2), pp. 133–149.
• LITMAN, T.(2012), Evaluating accessibility for transportation planning, Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
• Lodz City Centre Urban Regeneration Programme. On-line portal. https://rewitalizacja.uml.lodz.pl/ [accessed on: 27.11.2020].
• ŁOG – Łódzki Ośrodek Geodezji – Lodz Geodesy Centre. http://mapa.lodz.pl/index.php?strona=prof WMS and WFS service [accessed on: 25.11.2020].
• MAJEWSKA, A. and DENIS, M. (2020), ‘New directions of small city development – case study of Mszczonów’, Space and Form, Przestrzeń i Forma, 43, pp. 215–228. https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2020.43.C-07
• MARSHALL, S.(2005), Streets & Patterns, New York: Spon Press.
• MARSHALL, W. and GARRICK, N. (2010), ‘The Effect of Street Network Design on Walking and Biking’, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2198, pp. 103–115. https://doi.org/10.3141/2198-12
• MEEROW, S., NEWELL, J.P. and STULTS, M., (2016), ‘Defining urban resilience: A review’, Landscape and Urban Planing, 147, p. 39.
• MILLWARD, H., SPINNEY, J. and SCOTT, D. (2013), ‘Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances’, Journal of Transport Geography, 28, pp. 101–110.
• MOORE, S. and TRUDEAU, D. (2020), ‘New Urbanism: From Exception to Norm – The Evolution of a Global Movement’, Urban Planning, 5 (4), pp. 384–387.
• MOSELEY, D., MARZANO, M., CHETCUTI, J. and WATTS, K. (2013), ‘Green networks for people: Application of a functional approach to support the planning and management of greenspace’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 116, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.004
• MPU – Miejska Pracownia Urbanistyczna w Łodzi – Municipal Urban Planning Studio in Lodz. Local zoning plans, https://mpu.lodz.pl/opracowania/plany-miejscowe [accessed on: 21.10.2020].
• NASAR, J. L. (2003), ‘Does neotraditional development build community?’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23 (1), pp. 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03256224
• PEPONIS, J., ALLEN, D., HAYNIE, D., SCOPPA, M. and ZHANG, Z. (2007), Measuring the Configuration of Street Networks: the Spatial Profiles of 118 Urban Areas in the 12 Most Populated Metropolitan Regions in the U.S. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Plan to adapt the City of Lodz to climate change, Lodz: UMŁ [online], https://uml.lodz.pl/ekoportal/eko-wiedza/miasto/miejski-plan-adaptacji-do-zmian-klimatu/ [accessed on: 30.09.2020].
• Poland’s Strategic Adaptation Plan for Climate Vulnerable Sectors and Areas to 2020, with an outlook to 2030 (2013).
• PREISNER, W. F. (2007), Integrating the seven principles of universal design into planning practice. Universal design and visitability: from accessibility to zoning, Columbus, Ohio, USA: The John Glenn School of Public Affairs, pp. 11–30.
• Resolution No. XXV/589/16 of Lodz City Council of 10 February 2016 on indicating degraded zone and regeneration zone in Lodz (2016).
• Revitalisation Act of 9 October 2015 (2015).
• SONG, Y. and KNAAP, G.-J. (2004), ‘Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34 (6), pp. 663–680.
• SOUTHWORTH, M. and BEN-JOSEPH, E. (1997), Street and the Shaping of Towns and Cities, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• STRAATEMEIER, T. and BERTOLINI, L. (2020), ‘How can planning for accessibility lead to more integrated transport and land-use strategies? Two examples from the Netherlands’, European Planning Studies, 28 (9), pp. 1713–1734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1612326
• STRYJAKIEWICZ, T., KUDŁAK, R., CIESIÓŁKA, P., KOŁSUT, B. and MOTEK, P. (2018), ‘Urban regeneration in Poland’s non-core regions’, European Planning Studies, 26 (2), pp. 316–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1361603
• TALEN, E. (2000), ‘New Urbanism and the culture of criticism’, Urban Geography, 21 (4), pp. 318–341. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.21.4.318
• TALEN, E. (2002), ‘Pedestrian Access as a Measure of Urban Quality’, Planning Practice & Research, 17 (3), pp. 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/026974502200005634
• TALEN, E.(2019), A Research Agenda for New Urbanism, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, USA: Edward, Elgar.
• United Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) (2017), Trends in Urban Resilience. ISBN: 978-92-1-132743-4.
• WARZYWODA-KRUSZYŃSKA, W. and JANKOWSKI, B. (2013), Ciągłość i zmiana w enklawach biedy, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• YANG, Y. and DIEZ-ROUX, A. V. (2012), ‘Walking Distance by Trip Purpose and Population Subgroups’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43 (1), pp. 11–19.
• ZIM – Zarząd Inwestycji Miejskich w Łodzi – Municipal Board of Investment in Lodz. Plans of examined investments [accessed on: 5–13.11.2020].

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1231-1952.29.1.06

Biblioteka Nauki

2130143