Public contestation practices in Russia in 2000–2020

• Authors: Roman Savenkov
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article analyzes the influence exerted by the limitation of legal opportunities for public contestation in the 2000s on the scope of mobilization and the repertoire of public contestation practices. The term ‘public contestation’ is used to describe forms of individual and collective political activity focused on criticizing, denying and resisting the current government project, including by introducing alternative projects. The public contestation includes constructive actions of political actors not related to causing damage or disposing of political opponents. The paper is based on political and legal analysis and on some elements of event analysis. In the 2000s, the scale of public contestation on discursive and protest platforms was smaller than over the next decade, which did not create any needs for detailed regulation of such activities. At the same time, changes in political and legal opportunities in the electoral and party field were quite intense throughout 2000–2020. The most popular forms of public contestation were public events (in 2011–2018), as well as discursive activity on the Internet and in mass media (after 2018). During the above mentioned period, we see the biggest changes in legal opportunities in this field and increasing penalties for respective violations. The electoral field shows the pendulum dynamics: decreasing and increasing opportunities in 2000–2011 and 2012–2019, respectively. A meaningful factor of narrowing legal opportunities for public contestation is the potential financial, organizational and information support of public contestation practices by foreign entities.

Keywords

EN

Contestation; political opportunity; protest; political party; non-government organization

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Eastern Review
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 9
• Pages: 83-103

Dates

published

2020-12-30

Contributors

author

Roman Savenkov

• Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia, Department of Sociology and Political Science

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-2444

References

• Aktsiya za chestnye vybory v Moskve. Glavnoe. 2019. RBC, 24 June. https://www.rbc.ru/politics/27/07/2019/5d3c8a7c9a7947630f84424a (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Avril, E., Neem, J. 2015. Democracy, Participation and Contestation: Civil society, governance and the future of liberal democracy. London: Routledge.
• Beinin, J., Frédéric, V. 2013. Social Movements, Mobilization, and Contestation in the Middle East and North Africa. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Borisov, N., Korgunyuk, Y., Lyubarev, A. (eds.). 2015. Partiynaya reforma i kontrreforma 2012–2014 godov: predposylki, predvaritel’nyye itogi, tendentsii. Moskva: KMK.
• Dahl, R. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Doklad o deyatel’nosti Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii za 2017 god. 2018. Rossijskaya gazeta. 17 April, https://rg.ru/2018/04/16/doklad-site-dok.html (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Doklad o sostoyanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossijskoj Federacii (2011 g.). 2012. Moskva: Obshchestvennaya palata RF.
• Federal’ny zakon 121 “Ob inostrannyh agentah”, 2014. RIA-Novosti, 16 July, https://ria.ru/20140616/1011656413.html (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 12.01.1996, 7-FZ “O nekommercheskih organizaciyah”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_8824/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 19.06.2004 №54-FZ “O sobraniyah, mitingah, demonstraciyah, shestviyah i piketirovaniyah”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_48103/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 27.07.2006, 149-FZ “Ob informacii, informacionnyh tekhnologiyah i o zashchite informacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61798/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 2.04.2012, 28-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal’nyj zakon ot 11.07.2001 №95-FZ O politicheskih partiyah”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_127961/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 20.07.2012, 121-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii v chasti regulirovaniya deyatel’nosti nekommercheskih organizacij, vypolnyayushchih funkcii inostrannogo agenta”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_132900 (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 28.12.2012, 272-FZ “O merah vozdejstviya na lic, prichastnyh k narusheniyam osnovopolagayushchih prav i svobod cheloveka, prav i svobod grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_139994/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 23.05.2015, 129-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_179979/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 9.03.2016, 66-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii o vyborah i referendumah i inye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_194895/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 2.06.2016, 179-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v stat’yu 8 Federal’nogo zakona Ob obshchestvennyh ob’edineniyah i stat’yu 2 Federal’nogo zakona O nekommercheskih organizaciyah”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_198862/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 27.12.2018, 555-FZ “O vnesenii izmeneniya v stat’yu 3.1 Federal’nogo zakona O merah vozdejstviya na lic, prichastnyh k narusheniyam osnovopolagayushchih prav i svobod cheloveka, prav i svobod grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_314692/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’nyj zakon ot 18.03.2019, 30-FZ “O vnesenii izmeneniya v Federal’nyj zakon Ob informacii, informacionnyh tekhnologiyah i o zashchite informacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_320400/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 2.12.2019, 426-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii O sredstvah massovoj informacii i federal’nyj zakon Ob informacii, informacionnyh tekhnologiyah i o zashchite informacii”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_339109/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Federal’ny zakon ot 30.12.2020, 481-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii v chasti ustanovleniya dopolnitel’nyh mer protivodejstviya ugrozam nacional’noj bezopasnostihttp”, //publication.pravo.gov.ru/ Document/Text/0001202012300001 (accessed 22.01.2021).
• Federal’nyj zakon ot 30.12.2020, 497-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal’nyj zakon O sobraniyah, mitingah, demonstraciyah, shestviyah i piketirovaniyah”, https://rg.ru/2021/01/11/sobraniya-dok.html (accessed 22.01.2021).
• Gayvoronskiy, Y. 2018. Faktory nacionalizacii partijnoj sistemy sovremennoj Rossii. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya 1, pp. 45–61.
• Gluhova, A. 2020. Vnutripoliticheskaya povestka dnya kak faktor edinstva sovremennoj Rossii. Voronezh: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskij centr “Nauchnaya kniga”.
• Graeme, R. 2011. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes. Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Greene, S. 2014. Moscow in Movement: Power and Opposition in Putin’s Russia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Habermas, H. 2017. Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoj sfery: Issledovaniya otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo “Ves’ Mir”.
• Harriss, J. 2010. “Participation” and Contestation in the Governance of Indian Cities. Simons Papers in Security and Development 3, https://summit.sfu.ca/item/14834 (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (eds.). 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ionescu, G. 1966. Control and Contestation in Some One-Party States. Government and Opposition 1, pp. 240–250.
• Jayasuriya, K., Rodan G. 2007. Beyond Hybrid Regimes: More Participation, Less Contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization 14(5), pp. 773–794.
• Jouvenel, B. 1966. The means of Contestation. Government and Opposition 1, pp. 155–174.
• Katsaura, O. 2012. Community Governance in Urban South Africa: Spaces of Political Contestation and Coalition. Urban Forum 23(3), pp. 319–342.
• Kertman, K., Miryasova, O. 2010. Ot obyvatelej k aktivistam. Zarozhdayushchiesya social’nye dvizheniya v sovremennoj Rossii. Moskva: Tri kvadrata.
• Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, 2001. 195-FZ, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34661/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• The Legacy of the Arab Spring. New Forces and Fault Lines. 2016. Revolutions 4, Issue 1.
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., Tilly, C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nisnevich, Y. 2011. Politiko-pravovoy analiz kak metod politicheskikh issledovaniy. Kontury global’nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, parvo 1, pp. 6–15.
• Patrushev, S.W. (ed.). 2013. Grazhdanskoe i politicheskoe v rossijskih obshchestvennyh praktikah. Moskva: Rossijskaya politicheskaya enciklopediya (ROSSPEN).
• Patrushev, S.W. (ed.). 2016. Massovaya politika: institucional’nye osnovaniya. Moskva: Politicheskaya enciklopediya.
• Peticiya Prezidentu, https://петиция-президенту.рф (accessed 20.04.2020).
• Pod’yachev, K., 2012. Protestnoe dvizhenie v Rossii “nulevyh”: genezis i specifika. Vestnik instituta sociologii RAN 5, pp. 146–163.
• Porshnev, A., Lyachina, K. 2018. Analiz dinamiki elektronnyh peticij na portale Rossijskaya obshchestvennaya iniciativa. Gosudarstvo i grazhdane v elektronnoj srede 2, pp. 118–125.
• Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF, 2013, № 4-P “Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti federal’nogo zakona O vnesenii izmenenij v Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah i federal’nyj zakon O sobraniyah, mitingah, demonstraciyah, shestviyah i piketirovaniyah v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoj Dumy i zhaloboj grazhdanina E.V. Savenko”, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_142234/ (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Protesty 23.01. Glavnoe, 2021. Kommersant. 23 January. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4661089 (accessed 24.01.2021).
• Putin podpisal zakon o “nezhelatel’nyh” organizaciyah. 2015. Informacionnoe agentstvo Rossii – TASS, http://tass.ru/politika/1990676 (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Rossijskaya obshchestvennaya iniciativa, https://www.roi.ru/page/how-it-works/ (accessed 20.04.2020).
• Rossiyanam otbili zhelanie mitingovat’. 2019. Kommersant, 2 December, https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4179030 (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Salenko, A. 2019. Svoboda mirnyh sobranij: “detskie mitingi” i “vzroslye sankcii”. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava 8, pp. 48–61.
• Savenkov, R. 2019. Elektoral’nyj potencial oppozicionnyh kandidatov po itogam vyborov v regional’nye parlamenty v Central’no-Chernozemnom regione (2010–2018 gg.). Politicheskaya nauka 2, рр. 74–94.
• Shul’man E. 2014. Surrogaty parlamentarizma. Pro et Contra 1–2, pp. 124–132.
• Sztompka, P. 2012. Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
• Tilly, C., Tarrow, S. 2015. Contentious Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Second Edition.
• Timofeeva, L. 2020. Publichnaya kritika kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya nasiliya v obshchestve. Politicheskaya nauka 3, pp. 114–146.
• Trantidis, А. 2016. Is government contestability an integral part of the definition of democracy? Politics 37, pp. 67–81.
• V. Putin uzhestochil nakazanie za besporyadki na mitingah, 2014. Rossijskaya gazeta. 22 July, http://www.rg.ru/2014/07/22/mitingi-anons.html 29.09.2015 (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Van Vossole, J. 2015. Long waves of political contestation. Kondratieff Waves 2, pp. 276–297.
• Vidyasova, L., Tensina, Y. 2017. Issledovanie rezul’tativnosti raboty portala “Rossijskaya obshchestvennaya iniciativa”. Gosudarstvo i grazhdane v elektronnoj srede 1, pp. 56–65.
• Volkov, D. 2012. Protestnye mitingi v Rossii konca 2011–nachala 2012 gg.: zapros na demokratizaciyu politicheskih institutov. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya 2, pp. 73–86.
• Volodenkov, S. 2020. Transformaciya sovremennyh politicheskih processov v usloviyah cifrovizacii obshchestva: klyuchevye scenario. Kontury global’nyh transformacij: politika, ekonomika, parvo 13, 2, pp. 6–24.
• Yа ne ponimayu, 2020. Kommersant, 17 June, https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4380436 (accessed 22.06.2020).
• Zhuvenel de, B. 2011. Vlast’: Yestestvennaya istoriya yeyë vozrastaniya. Moskva: Mysl’.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1427-9657.09.06