Integrated Evaluation of Innovative Development of the New EU Member States and Other EU Countries

• Authors: Olena Dovgal , Nataliia Goncharenko , Viktoriia Karp , Georgij Revyakin

Title variants

PL

Zintegrowana ocena innowacyjnego rozwoju nowych państw członkowskich UE i innych krajów UE

Abstracts

PL

W niniejszym opracowaniu poruszono problem szacowania różnych aspektów i cech jakościowych rozwoju innowacyjnego. Zaproponowano nowe podejście metodologiczne do kompleksowej oceny polistrukturalnego charakteru nowoczesnego rozwoju innowacyjnego w nowych państwach członkowskich UE i pozostałych państwach członkowskich UE. To pozwoliło na identyfikację punktów wzrostu i obiecujących obszarów umożliwiających zwiększanie ich innowacyjnego rozwoju. Przeanalizowano takie aspekty jak zdolność do absorpcji informacji, innowacyjna orientacja i efektywność synergii. Analiza opiera się na logicznej ocenie wskaźników charakteryzujących naukę, technologię i społeczeństwo cyfrowe w oparciu o dane dostępne publicznie, z których wybrano główne wskaźniki charakteryzujące te trzy aspekty innowacyjnego rozwoju UE. Według algorytmu metody macierzowej dla nowych państw członkowskich UE i pozostałych państw UE dla każdego wskaźnika wybrano wartość maksymalną (referencyjną) i obliczono współczynnik zgodności z wartością referencyjną danego wskaźnika. W efekcie obliczono zintegrowane wskaźniki oceny zdolności do absorpcji informacji, innowacyjnej orientacji i efektywności synergii oraz zintegrowany wskaźnik rozwoju innowacyjnego krajów UE, co pozwoliło na ich ocenę. Innowacyjny rozwój gospodarek krajów UE różni się znacznie w odniesieniu do niektórych wskaźników i aspektów. Ocena i porównanie rozwoju innowacyjnego na poziomie krajowym zależą od wielu czynników, ale są determinowane przede wszystkim polityką państwa i priorytetami danego kraju. Dlatego obiecującym kierunkiem zwiększania innowacyjności wszystkich krajów UE powinien być przede wszystkim dalszy rozwój wzajemnej wymiany technologii w oparciu o istniejący naukowo‑techniczny potencjał integracji.

EN

This study investigates the problem of estimating various aspects and qualitative features of innovative development. A new methodological approach to comprehensively assessing the polystructural nature of modern innovative development in the new EU member states and other EU countries is proposed, which allows us to identify growth points and promising areas to increase their innovative development. Aspects such as information adaptability, innovative orientation, and synergetic efficiency are considered. The analysis is based on a logical evaluation of indicators that characterize science, technology, and the digital society in accordance with the data presented in the public domain, from which the main indicators that characterize these three aspects of the EU’s innovative development were selected. According to the algorithm of the matrix method for the new EU member states and other EU countries, the maximum (reference) value was chosen for each indicator and the coefficient of compliance with the reference value of a particular indicator was calculated. As a result, integrated indicators of assessing information adaptability, innovative orientation, and synergetic efficiency and the integrated indicator of innovative development of the EU countries were calculated, which allowed us to rate them. The innovative development of the economies of the EU countries differs significantly in some indicators and aspects. The assessment and comparison of innovative development at the national level depends on many factors but is primarily determined by public policy and national priorities of a particular country. That is why a promising direction of increasing the innovative development of all EU countries should be, first of all, the further development of their mutual exchange of technologies based on the existing integration scientific and technical potential.

Keywords

PL

rozwój innowacyjny; zdolność do absorpcji informacji; innowacyjna orientacja; efektywność synergii; zintegrowany wskaźnik rozwoju innowacyjnego

EN

innovative development; information adaptability; innovative orientation; synergetic efficiency; integrated indicator of innovative development

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 25
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 117-136

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Olena Dovgal

• Dr.Sc. of Economics, Professor (full) at the V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Kharkiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000332199731

author

Nataliia Goncharenko

• Ph.D. (Economics), Associate Professor at the V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000341485369

author

Viktoriia Karp

• Ph.D. (Economics), Associate Professor at the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000222318517

author

Georgij Revyakin

• Ph.D. (Economics), Associate Professor at the V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000243374710

References

• Awate, S., Larsen, M.M., Mudambi, R. (2015), Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms, ʽJournal of International Business Studiesʼ, 46 (1), pp. 63–86, https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.46
• Badrudin, R., Hale, Y. (2019), Organizational innovation implementations to achieve development goals: Evidence from Indonesia, “Journal of Applied Economic Sciences”, Volume XIV, 4 (66), pp. 986–992.
• Belderbos, R., Sleuwaegen, L., Somers, D., and De Backer, K. (2016), Where do locate innovative activities in global value chain. Does co‑location matter? OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing, Paris.
• Bokov, Yu., Tonkikh, A., and Khudiakova, M. (2019), Legal Regulation of Innovative Technologies Usage for Sustainable Educational Systems Development, ʽJournal of Advanced Research in Law and Economicsʼ, Volume X, 5 (43), pp. 1399–1407, https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4823 (accessed: 27.05.2021).
• Cantwell, J. (2017), Innovation and international business, “Industry and Innovation”, 24 (1), pp. 41–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1257422
• Cassetta, E., Monarca, U., Dileo, I., Berardino, C., Pini, M. (2020), The relationship between digital technologies and internationalisation. Evidence from Italian SMEs, “Industry and Innovation”, 27 (4), pp. 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1696182
• Castellani, D. (2018), The changing geography of innovation and the multinational enterprise, [in:] G. Cook, J. Johns, F. McDonald, J. Beaverstock, N. Pandit (eds.), The Routledge companion to international business and economic geography. Routledge, London.
• DeGrazia, Ch., Myers, A., and Toole, A. (2020), Innovation activities and business cycles: Are trademarks a leading indicator?, “Industry and Innovation”, 27 (1–2), pp. 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1650252
• Dovgal, O., Goncharenko, N., Honcharenko, V., Shuba, T., and Babenko, V. (2019), Leadership of China In the Innovative Development of the BRICS Countries, “Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics”, Volume X , Winter, 8 (46), pp. 2305–2316.
• Filippetti, A., Frenz, M., Ietto‑Gillies, G. (2017), The impact of internationalization on innovation at countries’ level: The role of absorptive capacity, “Cambridge Journal of Economics”, 41 (2), pp. 413–439, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew032
• Giannini, V., Iacobucci, D., Perugini, F. (2019), Local variety and innovation performance in the EU textile and clothing industry, “Economics of Innovation and New Technology”, 28 (8), pp. 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1571668
• Goncharenko, N., Gamarli, R. (2020), Priority directions for ensuring the innovative activity development and technological progress of China, “The scientific heritage”, 7 (46), pp. 39–43, http://tsh‑journal.com/wp‑content/uploads/2020/05/VOL-7‑No-46-46-2020.pdf (accessed: 3.05.2021).
• Jablonski, J., Jablonski, M., Fedirko, O. (2018), Building knowledge‑based economy in the EU: methodological background and policy solutions, “International Economic Policy”, 2, pp. 7–33. https://doi.org/10.33111/iep.2018.29.01
• Karmanov, M.V., Kiseleva, I.A., Kuznetsov, V.I., Zavrazhin, A.V., Shubina, I.V. (2020), The Process of Innovation Diffusion and Adoption of Innovations in the Business Modelling for Travel Companies, “Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism”, Volume XI, 2 (42), pp. 346–354, https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.11.2(42).13
• Kortov, S.V. (2004), Analysis of the innovative development of the territory based on the evolutionary approach, “Innovation”, 6, pp. 25‒33.
• Malitskiy, B.A., Solovev V.P. (2006), Examination and monitoring of innovation processes. Methodological and legal aspects. Kyiv.
• Matyushenko, I., Goncharenko, N., and Michaylova, D. (2015), Future Consideration for Developing Energy Efficient Economy in Ukraine using Light Emitting Diode (LED) Enginery on the basis of NBIC‑Technologies, “Global journal of management and business research: Economics and Commerce”, 15 (5), (Ver.1.0), pp. 7–16, https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume15/2‑Future‑Considerations.pdf (accessed: 23.04.2021).
• Ortiz, J., Fumás, V. (2020), Technological innovation and the demand for labor by firms in expansion and recession, “Economics of Innovation and New Technology”, 29 (4), pp. 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1629535
• Rǎdoi, M., Șerban, R. (2019), Regional Innovation – A Pillar of Regional Competitiveness and an Object of Regional Development Policy, “Journal of Advanced Research in Management”, Volume X, 1, pp. 35–43.
• Saati, T. (1993), Making decisions. Hierarchy Analysis Method. Moscow.
• Shmoylova, R.A. (2008), Theory of Statistics. Moscow.
• CIA World Factbook (2020), https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/ (accessed: 12.04.2021).
• Destatis (2020), Statistisches Bundesamt, https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/DomesticProduct/Tables/Q_GDP.html (accessed: 11.04.2021).
• European Commission (2019), European Innovation Scoreboard, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• European Union (2015), Global Trends to 2030: Can the EU meet the challenges ahead? European Strategy and Policy System. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, http://europa.eu/espas/pdf/espasreport2015.pdf (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• Eurostat (2020), Data. Database, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• IDC (2018), Information Society Index, https://www.idc.com/groups/isi/main.html (accessed: 16.04.2021).
• INSEAD, WIPO (2019), The Global Innovation Index, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2019‑report (accessed: 2.04.2021).
• International Telecommunication Union (2018), Measuring the Information Society Report, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU‑D/Statistics/Pages/publications/misr2018.aspx (accessed: 3.04.2021).
• International Telecommunication Union (2019 a), Digital Access Index, http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/dai/ (accessed: 12.04.2021).
• International Telecommunication Union (2019 c), ICT Development Index, http://www.itu.int/net4/ITU‑D/idi/2017/index.html (accessed: 16.04.2021).
• International Telecommunication Union (2019 d), ICT Diffusion Index, https://www.unescwa.org/ict diffusion index (accessed: 16.04.2021).
• The Economist Intelligence Unit (2019), http://www.eiu.com/default.aspx (accessed: 2.04.2021).
• The Good Country (2019), The Good Country Index, https://www.goodcountry.org/index/results/ (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• The World Bank (2019), The Knowledge Economy Index, https://www.worldbank.org/en/search?q=knowledge+economy+index (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• UNCTAD (2019), Unctadstat, http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• UN Department of Economic and Social Development (2019), E-Government Development Index, https://zerde.gov.kz/en/activity/analysis-and-development-of-information-and-communication-technologies/international-ratings/UN-E-Government-Development-Index-EGDI/ (accessed: 17.04.2021).
• UNESCO (2019), Infostate is an index used to measure the Digital Divide, http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Infostate/en-en/ (accessed: 3.04.2021).
• United Nations (2019), Technology Achievement Index, https://measuring-progress.eu/technology-achievement-index (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• World Economic Forum (2019 a), E‑Readiness Index, http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2019/networked-readiness-index/ (accessed: 14.04.2021).
• World Economic Forum (2019 b), Networked Readiness Index, http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2019/networked-readiness-index/ (accessed: 1.04.2021).
• World Information Society Report (2007), The ICT Opportunity Index (ICT‑OI). Chapter Seven, http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/publications/worldinformationsociety/2007/WISR07-chapter7.pdf (accessed: 1.04.2021).

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1508-2008.25.16

Biblioteka Nauki

2083059