Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 24 | 2 | 27-40

Article title

Beyond Figures and Numbers Participatory Budgeting as a Leverage for Citizen Identity and Attachment to Place

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The purpose of the paper is to examine the potential of participatory budgeting (PB) for the formation of citizen identity and attachment to the place in terms of individual, territorial and thematic focus. In the theoretical discussion, the authors analyse the concepts of place attachment, social identity and their influence on civic participation. The authors propose a conceptual framework for the analysis of relationships between PB, place attachment, and social identity. In the case of the community development model of PB, place attachment should lead to the citizens’ increased inclination to participate. In the case of participatory democracy model of PB citizen participation can lead to a stronger place attachment. The con­ceptual framework presented in the paper requires empirical confirmation. Further research on the subject should revolve around the influence of place attachment on the formation of social identity and vice versa by application of the discussed models of PB. The placemakers should take into account literature-based evidence that advisory models of PB do not reinforce place identity. The places that apply one of the transition models should consider the evolution of their PB policies towards either community development model or participatory democracy model. By review of diverse theoretical approaches on place identity and local participation, the paper creates a solid foundation for further analysis of the relationships between the applica­tion of PB and the development of civic identity and place attachment.

Year

Volume

24

Issue

2

Pages

27-40

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-12-30

Contributors

  • University of Lodz, Faculty of International and Political Studies
  • University of Lodz, Faculty of International and Political Studies

References

  • Allegretti, G. “Paying Attention to the Participants’ Perceptions in Order to Trigger a Virtuous Circle.” Hope for Democracy: 25 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide. Ed. N. Dias. In Loco Association: São de Alportel, 2014.
  • Altman, I. , and S. M. Low, eds. Place Attachment. New York: Plenum, 1992.
  • Ashforth, B. E., et al. “Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions.” Journal of Management 34.3 (2008): 325–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
  • Avritzer, L. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press, 2009.
  • Baiocchi, G. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
  • Baiocchi, G. “Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Politics & Society 29.1 (2001): 43–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0032329201029001003
  • Braun, B. B., et al. “Place Attachment in Revitalizing Neighbourhoods. Individual and Block Levels of Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003): 259–271.
  • Cabannes, Y., Participatory Budgeting: Conceptual Framework and Analysis of Its Contribution to Urban Governance and the Millenium Development Goals. Working Paper 140, Quito: UN Habitat, 2004, pp. 1–65.
  • Campelo, A. “Rethinking Sense of Place. Sense of One and Sense of Many.” Rethinking Place Branding: Comprehensive Brand Development for Cities and Regions. Eds. M. Kavaratzis, et al. Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 51–60.
  • Clarke, M., and J. Stewart. Community Governance, Community Leadership and the New Local Government. York: York Publishing Services, 1998.
  • Cross, J. E. What is Sense of Place?, paper prepared for the 12th Headwaters Conference, Western State College, 2–4 Nov 2001.
  • De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. “Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy.” Politics & Society 26.4 (1998): 461–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0032329298026004003
  • De Souza Santos, Boaventura, ed. Democratizing Democracy: Beyond the Liberal Democratic Canon. London: Verso, 2007.
  • Fuhr, H., and T. Campbell. Leadership and Innovation in Subnational Government: Case Studies from Latin America, World Bank Development Studies, Mar 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5707-7
  • Fung, A. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
  • Gieseking, Jen Jack, et al., eds. The People, Place, and Space Reader. New York and London: Routledge, 2014.
  • Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
  • Hafer, J. A. and B. Ran. “Developing a Citizen Perspective of Public Participation: Identity Construction as Citizen Motivation to Participate.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 38 (2016): 206–222.
  • Hague, L. A. “Identity and Place: a Critical Comparison of Three Identity Theories.” Architectural Science Review 50.1 (2007): 44–51.
  • Harvard University Centre for Urban Development Studies. Assessment of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil, Washington: Inter-American Development Bank, 2003, p. 10.
  • Ingram, H., and S. R. Smith. Public Policy for Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2011.
  • Jorgensen, Bradley S., and Richard C. Stedman. “Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes toward Their Properties.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 21.3 (2001): 233–248.
  • Kavaratzis, Mihalis, and Mary Jo Hatch. “The Dynamics of Place Brands: An Identity-based Approach to Place Branding Theory.” Marketing Theory 13.1 (2013): 69–86.
  • Kerr, Greg, and Jessica Oliver. “Rethinking Place Identities.” Rethinking Place Branding Comprehensive Brand Development for Cities and Regions. Ed. M. Kavaratzis, et al. Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 61–72.
  • Low, S. On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2000.
  • Low, Setha M., and Irwin Altman. “Place Attachment: A Conceptual Inquiry.” Place Attachment. Ed. I. Altman and S. Low. Boston, MA: 1992, pp. 1–12.
  • Lowndes, V., et al. “Diagnosing and Remedying the Failings of Official Participation Schemes: The CLEAR Framework.” Social Policy and Society 5.2 (2006): 281–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1474746405002988
  • Manzo, L. C. “Beyond House and Haven: Toward a Revisioning of Emotional Relationships with Places.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23.1 (2003): 47–61.
  • Marquetti, A., et al. “Participatory Economic Democracy in Action.” Review of Radical Political Economics 44.1 (2011): 62–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0486613411418055
  • Maton, K. I. “Empowering Community Settings: Agents of Individual Development, Community Betterment, and Positive Social Change.” American Journal of Community Psychology 41.1–2 (Mar 2008): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9148-6
  • Peters, B. G., and J. Pierre. “Citizens versus the New Public Manager: The Problem of Mutual Empowerment.” Administration and Society 32.1 (2000): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019335
  • Proshansky, H. M. et al. “Place-Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 3 (1983): 57–83.
  • Relph, E. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion, 1976.
  • Roberts, N. “Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation.” American Review of Public Administration 34.4 (2004): 315–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288
  • Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. “Defining Place Attachment. A Tripartite Organization Framework.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (2010): 1–10.
  • Silva, Marcelo Kunrath. “Participation by Design: The Experiences of Alvorada and Gravataí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.” Radicals in Power The Workers’ Party (PT) and the Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. Ed. Gianpaolo Biaocchi. London: Zed Books 2003, pp. 113–130.
  • Simmons, R., and J. Birchall. “A Joined-up Approach to User Participation in Public Services: Strengthening the ‘Participation Chain.’” Social Policy & Administration 39 (2005): 260–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9515.2005.00439.x
  • Sintomer, Y., et al. “Transnational Models of Citizen Participation: The Case of Participatory Budgeting.” Journal of Public Deliberation 8.2 (2012).
  • Stortone, S., “Participatory Budgeting: Heading Towards a ‘Civil’ Democracy?” A Panacea for All Seasons? Civil Society and Governance in Europe. Eds. M. Freise, et al. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010, pp. 99–119
  • Tajfel, H. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • Totikidis V., et al. “The Concept of Community Governance: A Preliminary Review.” Refereed paper presented at the GovNet Conference, Monash University, Melbourne, 28–30th November, 2005. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/955/1/The_Concept_of_Community_Governance.pdf (Accessed 29 Mar 2017)
  • Vigoda, E. “From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 62 (2002): 527–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540–6210.00235
  • Wampler, Brian. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. University Park: Penn State Press, 2010.
  • Wampler, Brian. “Participatory Budgeting: Core Principles and Key Impacts”. Journal of Public Deliberation 8.2. (2012): 12–1 -12–13.
  • World Bank. State Society Synergy for Accountability. Lessons for the World Bank. World Bank Working Paper No 30. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 2004.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_1641-4233_24_03
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.