The Influence of Level of Proficiency in the L2 and L3 on the Production of the L3 Spanish Apico-alveolar Sibilant

• Authors: Jolanta Sypiańska , Zuzanna Cal

Abstracts

EN

Current Third Language Acquisition research has traditionally focused on the L2 status (e.g. Hammarberg 2001, Bardel & Falk 2007) or linguistic proximity (e.g. Cenoz 2001, Westergaard, Mitrofanova, Mykhaylyk & Rodina 2016). Limited research has been conducted on the influence of the potentially significant factor of level of proficiency, and particularly where proficiency in both the L2 (Tremblay 2006, Woll 2016) and the L3 (Hammarberg 2001, Wrembel 2010) may be considered as a conditioning factor for the shape of the L3. The aim of the current study was thus to determine the influence of L2 and L3 level of proficiency (L2LoP and L3LoP) and the interaction of the two factors on the production of the L3 Spanish apico-alveolar sibilant in a group of L1 Polish, L2 English and L3 Spanish trilinguals who had different levels of overall proficiency in the two foreign languages. The parameters of the sibilant under analysis were spectral moments: centre of gravity (M1), standard deviation (M2), skewness (M3) and kurtosis (M4) in intervocalic position in two-syllable words with initial stress. The results point to the influential role of both L2LoP and L3LoP as well as their interaction on the production of the L3 Spanish sibilant. When the level of proficiency in one of the languages was low, it allowed the other language with a higher level of proficiency to exert influence on the values of the spectral moments in the L3 sibilant. This interplay of factors furthers the understanding of how levels of proficiency in the L2 and the L3 condition the developing L3.

Keywords

EN

phonetics; linguistic proximity; language pedagogy; interference

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 89-107

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Jolanta Sypiańska

• Koszalin University of Technology, Poland

author

Zuzanna Cal

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland

References

• Bardel, Camilla and Falk, Ylva. 2007. The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557
• Bardel, Camilla and Falk, Ylva. 2012. The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn and J. Rothman (eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood, 61-78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.06bar
• Barreiro Bilbao, Silvia Carmen. 2002 Speech perception in L2. Odisea, 2, 7-14.
• Dart, Sarah. 1991. Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA [UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79].
• Dart, Sarah. 1998. Comparing French and English coronal consonant articulation. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0060
• Del Saz Caracuel, María. 2013. The effect of L1 dialect on the perception of phonetic variation in L2 morphological markers. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Sevilla.
• Elvira-Garcia, Wendy. (2014). Zero-crossings-and-spectral-moments, v.1.3 [Praat script].
• Flynn, Suzanne, Foley, Claire and Vinnitskaya, Inna. 2004. The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults' and children's patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175
• Forrest, Karen, Weismer, Gary, Milenkovic, Paul and Dougall, Ronald N. 1988. Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396977
• Garcia, Alison. 2013. The effects of L2 proficiency on L3 phonological acquisition: A preliminary test of the L2 proficiency hypothesis. In E. Voss, S. J. Tai and Z. Li (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum: Converging Theory and Practice, (pp. 173-186).
• Gordon, Matthew, Barthmaier, Paul. and Sands, Kathy. 2002. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32, 141–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100302001020
• Gut, Ulrike. 2010. Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 19-38.
• Hammarberg, Björn. 2001. Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen and U. Jessner (eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 21-41. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595509-003
• Hardcastle, William J., Laver, John and Gibbon, Fiona E. 2012. The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Hughes George W. and Halle, Morris. 1956. Spectral properties of fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908271
• Jassem, Wiktor. (1962). Noise spectra of fricative consonants. In IV International Congress on Acoustics, Copenhagen G-17, also In Speech Communication Seminar, Stockholm B8, 1962.
• Jongman, Allard, Wayland, Ratree. and Wong, Serena. 2000. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1288413
• Kellerman, Eric. 1977. Towards a characterization of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 2(1), 58-145.
• Koenig, Laura. L., Shadle, Christine H., Preston, Jonathan L. and Mooshammer, Christine R. 2013. Toward improved spectral measures of /s/: Results from adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1175-1189. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0038)
• Ladefoged, Peter. 1975. A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Li Fangfang, Edwards Jan and Beckman Mary E. 2009. Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 37(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.001
• Lindblad, Per. 1980. Svenskans sje- och tje-ljud i ett allmänfonetiskt perspektiv. Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund, 16. Lund: Gleerup.
• Lipińska, Dorota. 2015. The influence of L2 status on L3 pronunciation. English Insights, 1, 69-85.
• Llama, Raquel, Cardoso, Walcir and Collins, Laura. 2010. The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972255
• Macpherson Iain R. 1975. Spanish Phonology: descriptive and historical. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Martínez Celdrán, Eeugenio, Fernández Planas, Ana and Carrera-Sabaté Josefina. 2003. Illustrations of the IPA: Castilian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(2), 255-259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100303001373
• Meisel, Jürgen M. 1983. Transfer as a second-language strategy. Language & Communication, 3(1), 11-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(83)90018-6
• Mykhaylyk, Roksolana, Mitrofanova, Natalia, Rodina, Yulia. and Westergaard, Marit. 2015. The Linguistic Proximity Model: The case of Verb-Second revisited. BUCLD 39 Proceedings. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
• Navarro Tomás, T. 1957. Manual de pronunciación española, 5th edition. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
• Odlin, Terence. 1989. Language transfer: cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537
• Reetz, Henning and Jongman, Allard. 2009. Phonetics: transcription, production, acoustics, and perception. Chichester: Blackwell.
• Ringbom, Håkan. 1986. “Crosslinguistic influence and the foreign language learning process“. In: E. Kellerman, & M. Sharwood Smith (eds..), Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press, 150-162.
• Rothman, Jason. 2010. On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2/3), 245-273. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.011
• Rothman, Jason. (2013). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X
• Salcedo, Claudia S. 2010. The phonological system of Spanish. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 5, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2010.769
• Sánchez, Laura. (2014). An inquiry into the role of L3 proficiency on crosslinguistic influence in third language acquisition. Odisea : Revista de Estudios Ingleses, 15, 169-188.
• Simon, Ellen, Escudero, Paola and Broersma, Mirjam. 2010. Learning minimally different words in a third language: L2 proficiency as a crucial predictor of accuracy in an L3 word learning task. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembela and M. Kul (ed.), New Sounds : Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, 439-444.
• Slabakova, Roumyana. 2016. The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), pp. 651-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916655413
• Strevens, Peter. 1960. Spectra of fricative noise in human speech. Lang Speech, 3, 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096000300105
• Sypiańska, Jolanta. 2017. Cross-linguistic influence in bilinguals and multilinguals. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
• Tremblay, Marie-Claude. 2006. Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: The role of L2 proficiency and L2 exposure. Cahier’s Linguistiques d’Ottawa, 34, 109-119.
• Westergaard, Marit, Mitrofanova, Natalia, Mykhaylyk, Roksolana and Rodina, Yulia. 2016. Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666 - 682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859
• Whitley, M. Stanley. 2002. Spanish/ English Contrasts: A Course in Spanish Linguistics, 2nd edition. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
• Williams, Sarah and Hammarberg, Björn. 1998. Language switches in L3 production: implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295-333. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.3.295
• Wrembel, Magdalena. 2010. L2-accented speech in L3 production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972263
• Zampaulo, André. 2013. Sibilant Dissimilation in the History of Spanish: An Information-Theoretic Approach. In C. Howe et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 172-178. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.06

Biblioteka Nauki

1368414