Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 19 | 1 | 33-46

Article title

Time Metaphorization: Duality of Time as a Pursuer vis-à-vis Object of Pursuit

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This paper discusses the duality of metaphorical conceptualizations of time focusing in particular on time as a pursuerand time as an object of pursuit metaphors, which are based the Figure–Ground reversal of each other. Using examples taken from the British National Corpus, it argues that these metaphorical conceptualizations of time are inconsistent with each other. This inconsistency resembles the discrepancy between the moving time and moving observer metaphors, which are, in strict terms, also inconsistent with each other. Looking at such contrasts between metaphorical representations of time from a broader perspective suggests that the concept of time arises from different, both physical and socio-cultural, dimensions of human experience.

Year

Volume

19

Issue

1

Pages

33-46

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

  • University of Lodz, Poland

References

  • Bergson, Henri. 1889/2001. Time and Free Will, an Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness [First published in 1889]. New York: Dover.
  • Bernard, Emmanuel and John Griffin. 2009. Understanding Lucene’s query syntax. In Hibernate Search in Action, 202–214. Greenwich, CT: Manning.
  • Boroditsky, Lera and Michael Ramscar. 2002. The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought, Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434
  • Cohen, S. 2000. The early Renaissance personification of Time and changing concepts of temporality. Renaissance Studies, 14(3), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-4658.00339
  • Deignan, Alice. 2008. Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 280–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.018
  • Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The Structure of Time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.12
  • Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107340626
  • Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Piraha: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1086/431525
  • Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220
  • Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
  • Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 53–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005
  • Galton, Antony. 2011. Time flies but space does not: Limits to the spatialisation of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.002
  • Gibson, James J. 1975. Events are Perceivable But Time Is Not. In J. T. Fraser and N. Lawrence (eds.), The Study of Time II: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the International Society for the Study of Time, 295–301. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50121-0_22
  • Hancock, Peter A. and Richard A. Block. 2012. The Psychology of Time: A View Backward and Forward. American Journal of Psychology, 125(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.3.0267
  • Husserl, Edmund. 1939/1970. The Origin of Geometry. In The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy [First published in 1939], 353–378. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Hutchins, Edwin. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008
  • Idström, Anna. 2010. What Inari Saami idioms reveal about the time concept of the indigenous people of Inari. Yearbook of Phraseology, 1(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222623.1.159
  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
  • Kranjec, Alexander and Laraine McDonough. 2011. The implicit and explicit embodiment of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 735–748.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
  • Landes, David S. 2000. Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2012. Linguistic manifestations of the space-time (dis)analogy. In Luna Filipović and Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture, and cognition, 191–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.37.15lan
  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara and Krzysztof Kosecki (eds.). 2014. Time and Temporality in Language and Human Experience. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03331-1
  • Matthews, William J. and Warren H. Meck. 2014. Time perception: the bad news and the good. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1298
  • McTaggart, J. Ellis. 1908. The Unreality of Time. Mind, XVII(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457
  • Moore, Kevin E. 2006. Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.005
  • Moore, Kevin E. 2014. The Spatial Language of Time: Metaphor, Metonymy, and Frames of Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.42
  • Ornstein, Robert E. 1972. The Psychology of Consciousness. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Pettazzoni, Raffaele. 1954. Aion – (Kronos) Chronos in Egypt. In Raffaele Pettazzoni (ed.), Essays on the History of Religions, 171–179. Leiden: Brill.
  • Pęzik, Piotr. 2011. Providing corpus feedback for translators with the PELCRA search engine for NKJP. In Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski (ed.), Explorations Across Languages and Corpora: PALC 2009, 135–144. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Radden, Günter. 2004. The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In N. Baumarten, C. Böttger, M. Motz, and J. Probst (eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen, 225–238. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. and María A. Gómez. 2015. Time and Cognition in Marvell’s ‘To his Coy Mistress’. Cognitive Semantics, 1(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00102004
  • Smart, John J. C. 2008. The Tenseless Theory of Time. In T. Sider, J. Hawthorne, and D. W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, 226–238. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Stafford, Emma and Judith Herrin (eds.), 2005. Personification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan T. Gries (eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895
  • Szwedek, Aleksander. 2009. Conceptualization of space and time. In Piotr Łobacz, Władysław Zabrocki and Piotr Nowak (eds.), Language, Science and Culture, 317–333. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  • Szwedek, Aleksander. 2011. The ultimate source domain. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.2.01szw
  • Thiering, Martin. 2015. Spatial Semiotics and Spatial Mental Models: Figure-Ground Asymmetries in Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356878
  • Waliński, Jacek T. 2014. Complementarity of Space and Time in Distance Representations: A Cognitive Corpus-based Study. Łódź: Łódź University Press. https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-441-9
  • Williams, Robert F. 2004. Making meaning from a clock: Material artifacts and conceptual blending in time-telling instruction. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, San Diego.
  • Wittmann, Mark. 2013. The inner sense of time: how the brain creates a representation of duration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3452
  • Woelert, Peter. 2011. Human cognition, space, and the sedimentation of meaning. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9153-3

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2028574

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_1731-7533_19_1_03
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.