Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 20 | 63-79

Article title

Obraz Achillesa i Hektora w poezji rzymskiej. Prolego­mena

Authors

Content

Title variants

Obraz Achillesa i Hektora w poezji rzymskiej. Prolego­mena

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
-
EN
In this article the author tries to present the images of two great heroes of The Iliad, Achilles and Hector, that emerges from the Roman poetry and compare them with those present in the Greek tradition. In this analysis, focus is primarily put on The Aeneid of Virgil and on Ovid’s works, with minor remarks to the works of other authors. The article concludes that in the case of Achilles there is a huge difference between the image of this character in the Greek tradition and in Roman poetry. Achilles, who for Greeks was an object of universal esteem, in the eyes of Romans has become a synonym of a criminal, a ruthless murderer and the personification of the destroyer of Troy. The image of Hector in Roman literature is also different from the Greek perspective, since Roman authors idealized the prince of Troy to such an extent that they saw him as the greatest hero of the Trojan War.

Keywords

Year

Issue

20

Pages

63-79

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-12-30

Contributors

author
  • Uniwersytet Łódzki, Katedra Filologii Klasycznej, ul. Pomorska 171/173, 90–236 Łódź

References

  • Ahrensdorf, P. (2014). Homer on the Gods and Human Virtue: Creating the Foundations of Classical Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Anthologia latina, sive poesis latinae supplementum. (1906). F. Bücheler, A. Riese (eds.). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • Ausonius (1919). Epitaphia heroum qui bello Troico interfuerunt. W: Ausonius. T. E. Capps et al. (eds.). Loeb Classical Library. London: W. Heinemann.
  • Bassett, S. (1933). “Achilles’ Treatment of Hector’s Body”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. Vol. 64, 41–65.
  • Brill’s New Pauly: encyclopaedia of the ancient world: Antiquity. (2002). Vol. I. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Brill’s New Pauly: encyclopaedia of the ancient world: Antiquity. (2005). Vol. VI. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Clark, R. (2007). Dido’s Moment of Death as a Cosmic Event in Vergil’s Universe. W: P. Granoff, K. Shinohara, (eds.). Heroes and Saints: The Moment of Death in Cross-cultural Perspectives. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 261–284.
  • Friedrich, A. (2002). Das Symposion der XII Sapientes. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Gossage, A. (1955). “Two Implications of the Trojan Legend”. Greece & Rome, Vol. 2, No. 1, 23–29.
  • Grafton, A. et al. (eds.) (2010). The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Henry, J. (1878). Aeneidea, or critical, exegetical, and aesthetical remarks on the Aeneis. Vol. II. Dublin: Trustees of the Author.
  • Heyworth, S. (2007). Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Homer (1999). Iliada. Przeł. K. Jeżewska. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
  • Horatius, Q. (1881). Carmina. L. Mueller (ed.). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • Knight, W. (1932). “Magical Motives in Seneca’s Troades”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 63, 20–33.
  • Levin, S. (1949). “Love and the Hero of the Iliad”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 80, 37–49.
  • Murgatroyd, P. et al. (eds.) (2017). Ovid’s Heroides: A New Translation and Critical Essays. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
  • Musgrove, M. (1997). “Change of Perspective in Ovid, Metamorphoses 12.11–23”. The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 118, No. 2, 267–283.
  • Norton, E. (2013). Aspects of Ecphrastic Technique in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • O’Brien, J. (1994). Alexander the Great: The Invisible Enemy: a Biography. London: Routledge.
  • Ovid (1914). Heroides. Amores. Revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ovid (1916). Metamorphoses. Revised by G. P. Goold. Vol. II. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ovid (1939). Tristia. Ex Ponto. Revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Owidiusz (1986). Heroidy. Przeł. W. Markowska. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  • Owidiusz (1995). Metamorfozy. Przeł. A. Kamieńska i S. Stabryła. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
  • Papaioannou, S. (2007). Redesigning Achilles. ‘Recycling’ the Epic Cycle in the ‘Little Iliad’ (Ovid, Metamorphoses 12.1–13.622). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Privitera, T. (2015). „Intersezioni: Ausonio e l’Anthologia Latina”. AL. Rivista di studi di Anthologia Latina 6. 3–20.
  • Propertius, S. (1880). Elegiarum libri IV. A. Palmer (ed.). Londinii: G. Bell, Dublini: E. Ponsonby.
  • Schneider, R. (2012). The making of Oriental Rome: shaping the Trojan legend. W: P. Bang, D. Kołodziejczyk, (eds.). Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History. Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press. 76–129.
  • Scott, J. (1913). “Paris and Hector in Tradition and in Homer”. Classical Philology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 160–171.
  • Seneca, L. (1921). Tragoediae. R. Peiper, G. Richter, (eds.). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • Seneka, L. (2003). Troas: Tragedyja z Seneki. Przeł. Ł. Górnicki. Kraków: Universitas.
  • Smith, S. (1999). “Remembering the Enemy: Narrative, Focalization, and Vergil’s Portrait of Achilles”. Transactions of the American Philological Association, Vol. 129, 225–262.
  • Strabo. (1877). Geographica. A. Meineke (ed.). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • Tilroe, W. (1939). The Ilias Latina: A Study of the Latin Iliad, Including Translation, Commentary, and Concordance. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Libraries.
  • Vergilius, P. (1904). Aeneis. O. Ribbeck (ed.). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • Wergiliusz (1981). Eneida. Przeł. T. Karyłowski. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
  • Woods, M. (2016). Experiencing the Classics in Medieval Education. W: R. Copeland, (ed.). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 1 (800–1558). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 35–52.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_1733-0319_20_05
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.