Participant Recruitment Challenges in Researching Peer Groups and Migration Retrospectively

• Authors: Paula Pustułka , Natalia Juchniewicz , Izabela Grabowska

Title variants

Wyzwania rekrutacji respondentów w retrospektywnym badaniu grup rówieśniczych i migracji

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper discusses the challenges of researching peer groups through a multi-focal, temporal lens in a retrospective manner. Embedded in a broader “Peer Groups & Migration” Qualitative Longitudinal Study (QLS), the article focuses on recruiting young respondents (aged 19-34 at present) who originally come from one of the three medium-sized towns in Polish localities and are either migrants or stayers connected to mobile individuals. The respondents are tracked retrospectively and asked to discuss their adolescence, as well encouraged to provide contacts to their youth Peer Group members. Based on fieldwork experiences and field access challenges, four models of recruiting migrants’ high school peer groups are presented. Furthermore, variants and rationales of non-recruitment are also provided. Focusing on the process of establishing a long-term and large-scale peer panel in the QLS, the paper contributes detailed know-how and strategies around participant recruitment.

PL

Artykuł omawia wyzwania rekrutacji respondentów do retrospektywnego badania podłużnego grup rówieśniczych w kontekście upływającego czasu i mobilności przestrzennej. Opierając się na szerszym jakościowym badaniu w projekcie „Paczki przyjaciół i migracje” w artykule szczegółowo omówiony zostaje proces rekrutacji młodych respondentów w wieku 19–34 lata. Uczestnicy badania pochodzą z trzech miast powiatowych w Polsce i doświadczali migracji tak międzynarodowych, jak i wewnętrznych lub też byli powiązani z rówieśnikami, którzy wyjechali z ich lokalizacji pochodzenia. Respondenci proszeni byli o retrospektywne omówienie czasów swojej młodości/adolescencji, a także o przekazanie kontaktów do członków ich grupy rówieśniczej z okresu gdy mieli 15–19 lat. Na podstawie doświadczeń terenowych w artykule wyróżniono cztery modele rekrutacji grup rówieśniczych. Obok tych modeli wskazano także warianty oraz powody porażek rekrutacyjnych. Artykuł dostarcza praktycznej wiedzy o strategiach rekrutacji uczestników, szczególnie w kontekście budowania szeroko zakrojonego panelu rówieśniczego w ramach jakościowego badania podłużnego.

Keywords

EN

participant recruitment; migration; peer group; Qualitative Longitudinal Research (QLR); longitudinal study

PL

rekrutacja respondentów; migracja; grupa rówieśnicza; jakościowe badanie podłużne; badania longitudinalne; rekrutacja respondentów; migracja; grupa rówieśnicza; jakościowe badanie podłużne; badania longitudinalne

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 48-69

Dates

published

2017-12-28

Contributors

author

Paula Pustułka

• SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities

author

Natalia Juchniewicz

• SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities; University of Warsaw, Institute of Philosophy

author

Izabela Grabowska

• SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities; University of Warsaw, Centre of Migration Research

References

• Adam, Barbara E. 2008. “Future matters: futures known, created and minded.” Twenty-First Century Society 3(2):111-116.
• Allan, Graham. 1998. “Friendship, sociology and social structure.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15(5):685-702.
• Allan, Graham. 2011. “Commentary: Friendships and emotions.” Sociological Research Online 16(1), 15:1-16.
• Amit, Vered., (ed.). 2003. Constructing the field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. London: Routledge.
• Arcury, Thomas A. and Sara A. Quandt. 1999. “Participant recruitmentfor qualitative research: A site- based approach to community research in complex societies.” Human Organization 58:128-133.
• Arnett, Jeffrey J. 2007. “Socialization in Emerging Adulthood: From the Family to the Wider World, from Socialization to Self-Socialization.” Pp. 208-231 in Handbook of Socialization. Theory and Research, edited by J.E. Grusec, P.D. Hastings. New York: Guilford Press.
• Astin, Alexander W. 1993. What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Baltar, Fabiola and Ignasi Brunet. 2012. “Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook.” Internet Research 22/1:57-74.
• Berndt, Thomas and Kuenho Keefe. 1995. “Friends’ Influence on Adolescents’ Adjustment to School.” Child Development 66(5):1312-1329.
• Colvile, Robert. 2016. The Great Acceleration. How the World is getting Faster, Faster. London: Bloomsbury.
• Corsaro, William A., and Donna Eder. 1990. “Children’s peer cultures”. Annual review of sociology 16(1):197-220.
• Crosnoe, Robert, Shannon Cavanagh, and Glen H. Elder Jr. 2003. “Adolescent friendships as academic resources: The intersection of friendship, race, and school disadvantage.” Sociological perspectives 46(3):331-352.
• DeLaine, Marlene. 2000. Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London, Thousand Oakes, New Delhi: Sage.
• Eide, Phyllis and Carol B. Allen. 2005. “Recruiting Transcultural Qualitative Research Participants: A Conceptual Model.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 4(2):1-10.
• Fisher, Claude S. 1982. To Dwell Among Friends. Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: The Gower.
• Grabowska, Izabela and Justyna Sarnowska. 2017. “Transnarodowe wielostanowiskowe jakościowe badanie powtórzone w migrujących społecznościach lokalnych [Transnational multisited qualitative longitudinal study in migrating local communities].” Qualitative Sociological Review 13(3):6-28.
• Grabowska, Izabela et al. 2017a. „Peer groups and migration. Dialoguing theory and empirical research.” Youth Working Papers Series, University of Social Sciences and Humanities. Retrieved November 11, 2017 http://youth.swps.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/YWP-No-5_2017.pdf.
• Grabowska, Izabela et al. 2017b. Migrants as Agents of Change. Social Remittances in an Enlarged European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Heath, Sue et al. 2009. Researching young people’s lives. London: Sage.
• Howe, Neil and William Strauss. 2009. Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.
• Jones, Gill. 1999. “The Same People in the same Places? Socio-Spatial Identities and Migration in Youth”, Sociology 33:1-22.
• Kinney, David A. 1993. “From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school.” Sociology of Education 66(1):21-40.
• Kosinski, Michal et al. 2015. “Facebook as a Social Science Research Tool: Opportunities, Challenges, Ethical Considerations and Practical Guidelines.” American Psychologist 70(6):543-556.
• Krings, Torben et al. 2013. New mobilities in Europe. Polish migration to Ireland post-2004. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.
• Layder, Derek. 1998. Sociological practice. Linking theory and sociological research. London: Sage.
• Lynn-McHale, Debra and Janet A. Deatrick. 2000. “Trust between family and health care provider.” Journal of Family Nursing 6(3):210-230.
• Males, Mike A. 1996. The scapegoat generation: America’s war on adolescents. Monroe, Me: Common Courage Press.
• Mannheim, Karl. 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” Pp. 276-322 in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: Collected Works, 5, edited by P. Kecskemeti. New York: Routledge.
• McCabe, Janice. 2016. “Friends with Academic Benefits.” Contexts 15(3)22-29.
• McLean, Carl and Catherine M. Campbell. 2003. “Locating Research informants in a multi-ethnic community: Ethnic identities, social networks and recruitment methods.” Ethnicity and Health 8(1):41-61.
• McLeod, Julie and Rachel Thomson. 2009. Researching Social Change. London: Sage.
• Neale, Bren. 2013. “Adding Time into the Mix: Stakeholder Ethics in QL research.”Methodological Innovations Online 8(2):6-20.
• Neale, Bren. 2017. What is Qualitative Longitudinal Research? London: Bloomsbury.
• Neale, Bren and Jennifer Flowerdew. 2003. “Time, texture and childhood: The contours of longitudinal qualitative research.”International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(3):189-199.
• Neufeld, Anne et al. 2001. “Participation of immigrant women family caregivers in qualitative research.” Western Journal of Nursing Research 23(6):575-591.
• Ortiz, Steven M. 2001. “How interviewing became therapy for wives of professional athletes: Learning from a serendipitous experience.” Qualitative Inquiry 7(2):192-220.
• Patrick, Ruth. 2012. “Recruiting & Sustaining Sample Populations Over Time: Possibilities and Challenges.” Timescapes Methods Guides Series Guide 3. ISSN 2049-9248. Retrieved May 22, 2017.
• Pilcher, Jane. 1994. “Mannheim’s Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy.” British Journal of Sociology 45(3):481-495.
• Pustulka, Paula, Justyna Sarnowska, and Izabela Grabowska. Forthcoming.“Grupy rówieśnicze (peer groups) a decyzje migracyjne [Peer groups and migration decision-making].” Rocznik Lubuski.
• Ritchie, Jane and Jane Lewis. 2003. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.
• Rugkåsa, Jorun and Krysia Canvin. 2011. “Researching Mental Health in Minority Ethnic Communities: Reflections on Recruitment.” Qualitative Health Research 21(1):132-143.
• Ruspini, Elisabetta. 2002. Introduction to Longitudinal Research. London: Routledge
• Ryan, Allison M. 2000. “Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school.” Educational Psychologist 35(2):101-111.
• Ryan, Louise, Eleonore Kofman, and Pauline Aaron. 2011. “Insiders and outsiders: working with peer researchers in researching Muslim communities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14(1):49-60.
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2003. Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, Rowan & Littlefield.
• Seidman, Irving. 2013. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, London: Teachers College Press.
• Skelton, Tracy, Gill Valentine, and Deborah Chambers. 1998. Cool places. Geographies of youth culture. London, New York: Routledge.
• Strauss, William and Neil Howe. 1991. Generations. New York: Quill.
• Tang, Ning. 2002. “Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women. Sociology 36(3):703-721.
• Thomson, Rachel and Julie McLeod. 2015. “New frontiers in qualitative longitudinal research: an agenda for research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(3):243-250.
• Thomson, Rachel and Janet Holland. 2003. “Hindsight, foresight and insight: the challenges of longitudinal qualitative research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(3):233-244.
• Urberg, Kathryn A., Serdar D. Degirmencioglu, and Colleen Pilgrim.1997. “Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use.” Developmental Psychology 33:834-844.
• Weller, Susie. 2010. “Time(s) to be Creative! Sustaining Young People’s Engagement in Qualitative Longitudinal Research.” Pp. 34-48 in: Conducting Qualitative Longitudinal Research: Fieldwork Experiences. Working Paper Series, 2, edited by F. Shirani, S. Weller. Leeds: Timescapes.
• Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to labour. How working class kids get working class jobs. Hampshire: Gower.
• Youniss, James and Jacqueline Smollar. 1985. Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8069.13.4.04