The Methodological Convergences between Symbolic Interactionism and Constructivist Grounded Theory

• Authors: Andrea Salvini
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article explores the connection between Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) and Symbolic Interactionism (SI) in the light of the methodological position presented in Herbert Blumer’s Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. The examination of this connection will take place in three steps: firstly, I will offer some preliminary considerations with regard to ‘variant forms’ in Grounded Theory (GT) as well as cite the present debates about the differences and similarities between different approaches within it; then, I will describe the essential characteristics of the ‘methodological position’ of SI and build some lines of continuity between these elements and the main tenets of constructionist GT; finally, I will present ten conceptual expressions and methodological practices in which it is possible to verify the methodological convergence between the two perspectives. This analysis makes it possible to consider the Constructivist Grounded Theory as a set of coherent principles, methods, and research practices from the point of view of a scholar inspired by the SI’s perspective. However, the peculiar reference to the methodological position of SI does not exhaust the set of possible epistemological and methodological sources, from which the perspective of GT derives. Instead, it represents a controversial point, with regard to which the debate still appears to be particularly heated.

Keywords

EN

constructivist grounded theory; symbolic interactionism; Herbert Blumer; grounded theory; methodological alignment

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 10-29

Dates

published

2019-08-31

Contributors

author

Andrea Salvini

• University of Pisa, Via Serafini, 3 – 56100 Pisa, Italy

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-7984

References

• Aldiabat, Khaldoun M. and Le Navenec Carole-Lynne. 2011. “Philosophical Roots of Classical Grounded Theory: Its Foundations in Symbolic Interactionism.” The Qualitative Report 16(4):1063-1080.
• Annells, Merilyn. 1996. “Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism.” Qualitative Health Research 6(3):379-393.
• Apramian, Tavis, Sayra Cristancho, Chris Watling, Lorelei Lingard. 2016. “(Re)Grounding Grounded Theory: A Close Reading of Theory in Four Schools.” Qualitative Research 17(4): 359-376.
• Best, Joel. 2006. “Blumer’s Dilemma: The Critic as a Tragic Figure.” The American Sociologist 37(3):5-14.
• Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic lnteractionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
• Bowen, Glenn A. 2006. “Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(3):12-23.
• Bryant, Anthony. 2002. “Re-grounding Grounded Theory.” Journal of Information Technology: Theory and Application 4:25-42.
• Bryant, Anthony. 2017. Grounded Theory and Grounded Theorizing: Pragmatism in Research Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bryant, Anthony. 2019. The Varieties of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
• Bryant, Anthony, and Charmaz, Kathy, (eds.). 2007. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
• Bryant, Anthony, and Charmaz, Kathy, (eds.). 2019. The Sage Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
• Carter, Stacy M. and Miles Little. 2007. “Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 17(10):1316-1328.
• Chamberlain-Salaun, Jennifer, Jane Mills, Kim Usher. 2013. “Linking Symbolic Interactionism and Grounded Theory Methods in a Research Design: From Corbin and Strauss’ Assumptions to Action.” SAGE Open 3(3):1-10.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” Pp. 509-535 in Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed.), edited by N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2008a. “Grounded Theory as an Emergent Method.” Pp. 155-170 in Handbook of Emergent Methods, edited by S. N. Hesse-Biber, P. Levy. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2008b. “Constructionism and the Grounded Theory Method.” Pp. 397-412 in Handbook of Constructionist Research, edited by J. A. Holstein, J. F. Gubrium. New York/London: The Guilford Press.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2008c. “The Legacy of Anselm Strauss in Constructivist Grounded Theory.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 32:127-141.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2009. “Shifting the Grounds: Constructivist Grounded Theory Methods.” Pp. 127-193 in Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, edited by J. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A. E. Clarke. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2012. “Multiple Futures for Symbolic Interactionism: Time for the Past and the Future.” Pp. 15-22 in The Present and Future of Symbolic Interactionism, Vol. I, edited by A. Salvini, J. A. Kotarba, B. Merrill. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2015. “Foreword.” Pp. 7-8 in Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Research with Grounded Theory, edited by A. Clarke, C. Friese, R. Washburn. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
• Charmaz, Kathy and Reiner Keller. 2016. “A Personal Journey with Grounded Theory Methodology: Kathy Charmaz in Conversation with Reiner Keller.” Forum Qualitative Sozial-forschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research XVII, 1:art. 16.
• Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. London: Sage.
• Clarke, Adele E. 2008. “Celebrating Anselm Strauss and Forty Years of Grounded Theory.” Studies in Symbolic Interactio 32:63-71.
• Clarke, Adele E., Friese, Carrie, and Washburn, Rachel (eds.). 2015. Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Research with Grounded Theory. New York: Routledge.
• Clarke, Adele and Susan Leigh Star. 2008. The Social Worlds Framework: A Theory/Methods Package.
• Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
• Denzin, Norman K. 1994. “The Art and Politics of Interpretation.” Pp. 500-515 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Dunne, Ciarán. 2011. “The Place of the Literature Review in Grounded Theory Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14(2):111-124.
• Gibson, B. and Jan Hartman. 2014. Rediscovering Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
• Glaser, Barney G. 2002. “Constructivist Grounded Theory?” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum / Qualitative Social Research 3(3):art. 12.
• Glaser, Barney G. 2005. “The Impact of Symbolic Interactionism on Grounded Theory.” Grounded Theory Review 4(2). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2005/03/30/1575/
• Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
• Hammersley, Martin. 1989. “The Problem of the Concept: Herbert Blumer on the Relationship Between Concepts and Data.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18(2):133-159.
• Handberg, Charlotte, Sally Thorne, Julie Midtgaard, Claus V. Nielsen, Kirsten Lomborg. 2015. “Revisiting Symbolic Interactionism as a Theoretical Framework Beyond the Grounded Theory Tradition.” Qualitative Health Research 25(8):1023-1032.
• Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2008. Handbook of Constructionist Research. New York/London: The Guilford Press.
• Holton, Judith A. and Isabelle Walsh. 2017. Classic Grounded Theory: Applications with Qualitative and Quantitative Data. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Kendra L. Rieger. 2019. “Discriminating among Grounded Theory Approaches.” Nursing Inquiry 2 6: e 12261. https:// doi.org/10.1111/nin.12261
• Kenny, Méabh and Robert Fourie. 2014. “Tracing the History of Grounded Theory Methodology: From Formation to Fragmentation.” The Qualitative Report 19(52):1-9.
• Kenny, Méabh and Robert Fourie. 2015. “Contrasting Classic, Straussian and Constructivist Grounded Theory: Methodological and Philosophical Conflicts.” The Qualitative Report 20(8):1270-1289.
• Kleinman, Sherryl, Barbara Stenross, Martha McMahon. 1994. “Privileging Fieldwork over Interviews: Consequences for Identity and Practice.” Symbolic Interaction 17(1):37-50.
• Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2018. “Classic Grounded Theory – The Latest Version: Interpretation of Classic Grounded Theory as a Meta-Theory for Research.” Symbolic Interaction 41(4):547-564.
• Kools, Susan. 2008. “From Heritage to Postmodern Grounded Theorizing: Fourty Years of Grounded Theory.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 32:73-86.
• Kotarba, Joseph A. 2014. “Symbolic Interaction and Applied Social Research: A Focus on Translational Science.” Symbolic Interaction 37(3):412-425.
• Milliken, P. Jane and Rita Schreiber. 2012. “Examining the Nexus between Grounded Theory and Symbolic Interactionism.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11(5):684-696.
• Morrissette, Joëlle, Sylvie Guignon, Didier Demazière. 2011. “De l’usage des perspectives interactionnistes en recherche.” Recherches Qualitatives 30(1):1-9.
• Morse, Janice M. 2009, “Tussles, Tensions, and Resolutions.” Pp. 13-22 in Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, edited by J. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A. E. Clarke. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
• Morse, Janice, Phyllis N. Stern, Juliet, Corbin, et al. (eds.). 2009. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
• Newman, Barbara. 2008. “Challenging Convention: Symbolic Interactionism and Grounded Theory.” Collegian 15:103-107.
• Plummer, Ken. 2012. “Towards a Cosmopolitan Symbolic Interactionism.” Pp. 23-32 in The Present and Future of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by A. Salvini, J. A. Kotarba, B. Merrill. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
• Priya, Arya. 2016. “Grounded Theory As a Strategy for Qualitative Research: An Attempt at Demystifying Its Intricacies.” Sociological Bulletin 65(1):50-68.
• Richardson, Rudy and Eric H. Kramer. 2006. “Abduction as the Type of Inference that Characterizes the Development of a Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Research 6(4):497-513.
• Rupsienem Liudmila and Rasa Pranskuniene. 2010. “The Variety of Grounded Theory: Different Versions of the Same Method or Different Methods?” Social Sciences / Socialiniai mokslai 4(70):7-19.
• Steinmetz George. 2005. “The Epistemological Unconsciousness of US Sociology and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Case of Historical Sociology.” Pp. 109-157 in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, edited by J. Adams, E. S. Clemens, A. S. Orloff. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Staller, Karen M. 2012. “Epistemological Boot Camp: The Politics of Science and What Every Qualitative Researcher Needs to Know to Survive in the Academy.” Qualitative Social Work 12(4):395-413.
• Strauss, Anselm L. 1978. “A Social World Perspective.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1:119-128.
• Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Strauss, Anselm L. Continual Permutation of Actions. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
• Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Tarozzi, Massimiliano. 2009. “Conversazione con Barney G. Glaser: A quarant’anni dall’uscita di The Discovery of Grounded Theory.” Pp. 227-246 in La scoperta della Grounded Theory: Strategie per la ricerca qualitativa, Glaser. Barney G., Strauss, Anselm L., Edited by Antonio Strati, translated by M. Tarozzi. Roma: Armando Editore.
• Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
• Timmermans, Stefan and Iddo Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30(3):167-186.
• Travers, Max. 2001. “Varieties of Symbolic Interactionism: Grounded Theory and Dramaturgical Analysis.” Pp. 41-61, in Qualitative Research Through Case Studies, edited by M. Travers. London: Sage Publication.
• Van den Hoonaard, Will C. 1996. Working with Sensitizing Concepts: Analytical Field Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8069.15.3.02